Channel
@hrm_personality
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,508subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001677544514 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hrm_personality |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hrm_personality |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 1,508 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 1,509 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 1,513 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 1,513 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 48.6% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5235668517981815918 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| custom 5233576168828994696 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.86% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 10 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
История одного провала: они потратили бюджет на развитие, а команда не изменилась Степан, руководитель отдела продаж, был уверен: его команде нужен тренинг по работе с возражениями. Оля, HR-директор, сомневалась: она видела, что продавцы конфликтуют с маркетингом, и сделки срываются именно из-за этого. Что сделали Степан и Оля, читайте в наших карточках выше. ⬆️ А в новой статье мы разбираем пошаговый алгоритм диа…
❤2👍1🔥1
А впереди снова 3 дня выходных. Как настроение, коллеги? 🔥 — всё огонь, много задач выполнено ❤️ — спокойно и стабильно, довольны результатами 🎉 — предпраздничное, в предвкушении отдыха
❤4🎉2🔥1
Что делать HR-специалистам с критиками и негативистами в компании?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
🧠 Тренировка для памяти На этой неделе в рамках цикла полезных видео мы говорили про глобальные HR-тренды: демография, полизанятость, зеленая повестка, одиночество как риск выгорания и здоровье среднего возраста. Предлагаем за пару минут закрепить материал — ответьте на 1 вопрос в опросе ниже. 👇 Проверьте себя или пересмотрите видео — ответы точно будут полезны в работе.
🌷 Тюльпаны или равные возможности? (То и другое, и побольше) Каждый год перед 8 марта мы возвращаемся к теме равных прав и возможностей на работе. В этот раз прочитали свежий Global Gender Gap Report 2025 от World Economic Forum. Что такое гендерный разрыв и как его считают В отчёте WEF гендерный разрыв считают как “дистанцию до паритета” по четырём блокам: экономическое участие и возможности, образование, здоровье…
custom 52356685179818159182❤1👍1custom 52335761688289946961
Какая тема вам наиболее интересна?
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
💬 Что обсудим в следующий раз? Спасибо всем, кто участвовал в нашем предыдущем опросе. Мы подвели итоги и записали подкаст — он уже ждёт вас здесь. Теперь предлагаем выбрать следующую тему, которая актуальна для вас и вашей команды, — голосуйте в опросе ниже! #ваше_мнение
❤1
Personality — сервис для HR pinned a photo
⚡️ Новый эфир «Без пиджаков»: разбираем стереотипы про "мужские" и "женские" качества в бизнесе через призму тестов «Женщины слишком заботливые для жестких решений», «мужчины не умеют слушать и слышать команду» — сколько в этих утверждениях правды, а сколько мифов? Вместе с Натальей Безумовой и Марией Тельпуковой заглянем в результаты тестов Personality и проверим, насколько наши стереотипы совпадают с реальностью. …
❤2🔥2👀1
🔖 Продолжаем блок трендов в HR В прошлый раз говорили про искусственный интеллект, сегодня — ещё 5 глобальных вызовов, которые уже меняют рынок труда. Демография, экология, одиночество как бизнес-риск и новые форматы занятости — разбираем, что влияет на удержание сотрудников. Вы узнаете: ➡️ Почему поливоркинг становится конкурентным преимуществом, а не проблемой. ➡️ Что такое «зеленая повестка» в HR и как она повыш…
❤3🔥2custom 52356685179818159181
В феврале мы разбирались: как получить 93% отклика от сотрудников на исследование вовлечённости, зачем удалённой компании новогодний корпоратив и куда исчезают бюджеты на развитие команды 🥞 Первый блин не комом: кейс строительной компании, которая провела своё первое исследование вовлечённости и получила 93% отклика за неделю 🖥 Запись вебинара «HR-будущее: ключевые тренды, которые изменят вашу команду в 2026 году» …
❤3custom 52356685179818159182👍1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @hrm_personality. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что делать HR-специалистам с критиками и негативистами в компании?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая тема вам наиболее интересна?
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 10 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,385,277 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Personality — сервис для HR” (@hrm_personality), 1,508 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hrm_personality.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.