Канал, где вы можете найти разные схемки заработка в крипте. Мы участвуем в сейлах NFT, абузим вайтлисты, залетаем в аирдропчики и играем в p2e игры.
Чатик: https://t.me/+gp6CsmGF8WM0YjJi
Админ - @hret_money
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,392–2,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 14:33
2,392
-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:00
2,394
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:56
2,394
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 2,392 subscribers
Avg views / post
537
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
20 (18 October 2025 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
537
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
687
Videos
13
Links
692
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
293 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
69
23.5%
👍
63
21.5%
🐳
52
17.7%
😁
42
14.3%
🔥
38
13.0%
😍
10
3.41%
⚡
5
1.71%
🌚
5
1.71%
🎉
5
1.71%
🌭
2
0.683%
👎
1
0.341%
🕊
1
0.341%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
July: +4.98 $ETH
Total: +21.74 $ETH
Как я раньше говорил, времени у меня уже больше, поэтому профит неплохой, но я все равно не уделял достаточно времени торговле. В первую очередь я решил сделать для себя одну очень важную тулзу, которая буквально будет экономить мне кучу времени в будущем. Остальное время я уделял разработке сайта для Smart Flip Tools, и он уже почти закончен. В общем, у меня есть много идей и тул…
May - June: +0.41 $ETH
Total: 16.76 $ETH
Я не пропадал, лишь взял небольшой отпуск, слетал на Мадейру (10/10), ещё поездил по конфам, ну и закрыл ресторан. Теперь времени будет больше, и ничто лишнее не будет отвлекать. Впервые за последние 4 года я реально отдохнул, не смотрел свой инвентарь и даже не думал об этом. Теперь есть видение, в котором хочется развиваться. Начать я решил с того, что стал изучать ИИ, потом…
April: +5.33 $ETH
Total: +16.35 $ETH
Месяц получился довольно профитным за счёт того, что BAYC выросли до 11 ETH и потянули за собой весь рынок. Хотя по трейтам в этом месяце я купил не так много NFT.
Floor Bidder — как я и говорил, продолжил его раннить, и он оправдал мои ожидания: +1.8 $ETH. В этот раз я уделял ему куда больше внимания, довольно хорошо его подкорректировал, пересмотрел коллекции и нашёл моменты, …
March: +0 $ETH
Total: +11.02 $ETH
Месяц получился ни о чём — по факту вышел в 0. Но это стало результатом ряда ошибок:
1. -0.86 $ETH: неправильно настроил софт, из-за чего мне впарили 2 флорных Otherdeed по 0.5 $ETH
2. -0.45 $ETH: не обратил внимание, что Koda сильно просели, из-за чего один флипер впарил мне 3 Otherdeed с кодами. Я решил их разделить и забыл, что они ушли с блюра и теперь только на ос, где комса 6%…
Wave 6 результаты фарма
Как я уже говорил, данный сезон я не активно торговал. Всего получилось нафармить — 9 сундук на 2 звезды. Ещё и рынок нфт сильно просел, но бот все же наторговал в профит.
🟪 ETH Bidder
• Объём покупок: ~41.2 $ETH
• Общий профит: +2.932 $ETH (за все сезоны)
• Профит за сезон: +0.747 $ETH
Могло быть лучше?
Да
Доволен ли я результатом?
Тоже да, + могу рефнуть примерно 1-1.5е которые ушли н…
February: +3.65 $ETH / UPnL -0.29 $ETH
Наконец-то дошли руки написать пост и подвести итоги прошлого месяца. Как видите, результат значительно хуже, и причина всему — моя лень, которая примерно длится уже месяц.
Первую половину месяца я, приехав с отдыха, +- активно торговал, но потом просто пропал и занимался чем угодно, кроме торговли. Первое время софт работал по неактуальным настройкам, но позже мне стало лень …
Wave 5 результаты фарма
Сезон выдался довольно активным — бот купил 390 NFT. При этом капитализация всего рынка NFT упала до $1.5B☠️
🟪 ETH Bidder
• Объём покупок: 82.26 $ETH
• Общий профит: +2.185 $ETH (за все сезоны)
• Профит за сезон: +0.71 $ETH
Сам уже запутался, как считал профит, поэтому сейчас картина примерно такая
6 сезон закончится только 1 апреля, а 30 марта планируют провести стрим, на котором расск…
https://polymarket.com/ru/event/will-opensea-launch-a-token-by-142
загружаюсь на то что OS всё же выйдет в Q1
14 января Adam последний раз подтвердил что планы не поменялись
Но после интервью с Meebits, где он сказал что моб приложение будет через месяцы кеф сильно упал. Интервью снимали в начале февраля. Я не думаю что за 2 недели у них что то сильно изменилось. Р/р оправдан как по мне
January: +6.5 $ETH / UPnL +1.16 $ETH
Это выдался довольно интересный месяц
Начался он очень приятно — NFT хорошо выросли, и впервые за долгое время и я полностью распродал весь инвентарь. Спасибо огромное Бутерину за то, что поставил Milady обратно на аватарку в Х. В этот же момент мне прилетела Milady 8242 с рарностью #36, которую я продал в +0.52 $ETH Это и был самый большой профит за месяц
Всего за месяц я купи…
❤10👍7⚡5
Signed Mike (Hret)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hret1337. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой контент вы хотите видеть дальше на канале? (можно выбрать несколько ответов)
Мои отчёты по торговле нфт каждый месяц41%
Продолжать рубрику по фарму OpenSea?51%
Новости и движ по рынку NFT46%
Свой вариант в комментариях10%
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2025 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 289,138 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Просто Хрет” (@hret1337), 2,392 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hret1337.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
