5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,991–8,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 08:27
8,001
-25
12 Aug 2026, 21:40
8,026
-20
9 Aug 2026, 20:21
8,046
-15
6 Aug 2026, 23:03
8,061
-9
6 Aug 2026, 11:18
8,070
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 8,001 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.672%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
26 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
33,120
Reactions total
210
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 39s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
210 reactions across 24 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
59
28.1%
❤
52
24.8%
👍
39
18.6%
👏
36
17.1%
💯
7
3.33%
😨
6
2.86%
🙏
5
2.38%
⚡
2
0.952%
😁
2
0.952%
🏆
1
0.476%
🕊
1
0.476%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 26 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hr_blog_uz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
529 TA BAXTSIZ HODISA: RAQAMLAR ORTIDA NIMA BOR?
Maqolada 2026-yilning 7 oyida qayd etilgan mehnat faoliyati bilan bog‘liq baxtsiz hodisalar tahlil qilinib, ularning sabablari va oldini olish masalalari yoritilgan.
Shuningdek, mehnat xavfsizligida proaktiv yondashuvga o‘tish, xavflarni oldindan aniqlash va baxtsiz hodisalarni raqamli tizim orqali boshqarish bo‘yicha takliflar bayon etilgan.
Batafsil: https://hrblo…
📌 Intizomiy jazoni qo'llash muddatlari haqida
Mehnat kodeksining 314-moddasiga ko'ra intizomiy jazoni qo'llash muddatlari quyidagicha belgilangan:
⏱️ Umumiy muddat
Intizomiy jazo intizomiy qilmish aniqlanganidan keyin darhol, lekin aniqlangan kundan e'tiboran bir oydan kechiktirmay qo'llaniladi.
Bunda xodimning vaqtincha mehnatga layoqatsiz bo'lgan yoki ta'tilda bo'lgan davri hisobga olinmaydi.
📄 Xizmat tekshiruv…
⚖️ Ishdan boʻshatilgan xodimni qayta ishga qabul qilish: ish beruvchining majburiyati
Mehnat kodeksining 102-moddasi oxirgi qismiga koʻra, ish beruvchi quyidagi holda ilgari ishdan boʻshatilgan xodimni qayta ishga qabul qilishi shart 👇
📌 Agar mehnat shartnomasi Kodeks 161-moddasi 2-qismi 2-bandiga binoan (shtat qisqartirilishi sababli) bekor qilingan boʻlsa;
📌 Va shartnoma bekor qilingan kundan boshlab 6 oy ichida…
✈️ E’tibor berdingizmi❓
✈️ Davlat mehnat inspeksiyasining rasmiy deb ataluvchi va yirik ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda mehnatni muhofaza qilish sohasiga oid postlar tobora ko‘paymoqda.
✈️ Bu — sohada amalga oshirilayotgan izchil, tizimli va amaliy takomillashtirish ishlarining natijasi.
✈️ Aytgandim-ku:
Biz gap bilan emas, mehnatimiz va natijalarimiz bilan hurmat qilishga majbur qilamiz! 💪
Biz esa ishlashda davom etamiz.
N…
Yaqinda bir darsda ham shu fikrni aytdim.
Oldin o‘ylardim: biz 45 yoshga yetganimizdan keyin biz bilan jiddiy raqobatlasha oladigan yangi avlod kadrlari yetishib chiqsa kerak.
Sun’iy intellekt paydo bo‘lgach, bu fikrim o‘zgardi.
Endi 45 yoshgacha kutishga hojat yo‘q.
Bu ketishda 40 yoshga ham bormaymiz.
Chunki bugun raqobat faqat tajriba, bilim yoki lavozim bilan emas. Kim sun’iy intellektni tezroq o‘zlashtirsa,…
Qiladigan ishlar ko‘p. Doimgidek. Chalg‘ishga esa vaqt yo‘q.
Kimdir siz haqingizda nimadir dedi, nimadir qildi, qandaydir gap tarqatdi...
Agar har bir shunday gapga munosabat bildirib, kim bilandir pachakilashib yursangiz — vaqtingiz ham, energiyangiz ham shunga ketib qoladi.
Eng yomoni — siz o‘z maqsadlaringizdan chalg‘iysiz.
Har bir gapga javob berish shart emas.
Har bir insonga nimanidir isbotlash ham shart em…
Rahbar xodimning shaxsiyatini emas, uning ishini baholashi kerak.
Xodim topshiriqni bajarmadimi? Tanqid qilish mumkin. Hatto ayrim holatlarda talabni kuchaytirish, javobgarlik masalasini ham ko‘rib chiqish mumkin.
Lekin tanqidning obyekti xodimning shaxsi emas, aynan uning kasbiy faoliyati bo‘lishi kerak.
Afsuski, ayrim tashkilotlarda ish natijasini muhokama qilish juda tez xodimning shaxsiy jihatlarini muhokama q…
Ishga kirishda ariza yozish majburiy emas.
Mehnat kodeksining 127-moddasiga ko‘ra, ishga qabul qilish ish beruvchining buyrug‘i bilan rasmiylashtiriladi. Buyruq chiqarish uchun asos esa xodim bilan tuzilgan mehnat shartnomasi hisoblanadi.
Demak:
❌ ariza — buyruq chiqarish uchun asos emas;
✅ mehnat shartnomasi — asosiy hujjat.
Ariza yozdirish ko‘plab tashkilotlarda hanuzgacha saqlanib qolgan eski amaliyot. Xodim ar…
#VMQ_454
✒️ Mehnatni muhofaza qilishni boshqarish tizimi to‘g‘risidagi namunaviy nizomga ko‘ra, kasbiy tavakkalchiligi o‘ninchi darajagacha bo‘lgan tashkilotlar MMQB tizimini soddalashtirilgan shaklda ishlab chiqishi mumkinligi belgilangan.
Biroq, bu mehnatni muhofaza qilish talablarini kamaytirish degani emas. Soddalashtirish, eng avvalo, hujjatlashtirish va boshqaruv jarayonlarini ixchamlashtirishni anglatadi.
⚙…
Balnichniy puli qaysi muddatlarda toʻlanadi?
Koʻpchilikdan kelgan asosiy savol shu boʻldi.
Balnichniyning dastlabki 5 kuni uchun toʻlov ish beruvchi, 6-kundan boshlab esa Davlat ijtimoiy sugʻurta jamgʻarmasi tomonidan amalga oshiriladi. Shu sababli toʻlov muddatlari ham bir-biridan farq qiladi.
📌 Ish beruvchi toʻlaydigan qism
Odatda, xodim kasallik varaqasini topshirganidan keyin ish haqi toʻlanadigan sanada toʻla…
🔥Барча ҳудудлар бўйича фаол вакансиялар🔥
🏙: Тошкент
🏙: Самарқанд
🏙: Бухоро
🏙: Фарғона
🏙: Андижон
🏙: Наманган
🏙: Жиззах
🏙: Қашқадарё
🏙: Навоий
🏙: Сурхондарё
🏙: Хоразм
🏙: Сирдарё
🏙: Қорақалпоғистон
➡️ Барча вакансияларни расмий osonish.uz сайтидан кўриш ва ариза бериш мумкин.
⬇️ Мобиль иловани юклаб олинг:
🛒 Play market / 🍏App Store
⌛ Телеграм каналга обуна бўлинг: @osonish_uz
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @hr_blog_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 335,074 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HR_blog_uz” (@hr_blog_uz), 8,001 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hr_blog_uz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.