Channel
@hqsj77
On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17,030subscribers
-296 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002355282956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hqsj77 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hqsj77 |
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
5.6 average views per post against 17,030 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.033%. Across the 2,630 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,002–31,610 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.63% and 9.59%, with a median of 4.04%.
| Window | 30 days (9 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 377 of 377 published in the window (377 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 2,095 |
| Mature posts only | 0.157% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 17,030 measured 5 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:zho · 2,630 channels · p10 0.51% · p25 1.63% · p50 4.04% · p75 9.59% · p90 20.0% |
| Position in cohort | 0.685th percentile · 1/125 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.17% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 8 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 17,030 | -41 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 17,071 | -41 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:48 | 17,112 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:26 | 17,121 | -25 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 17,146 | -21 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 17,167 | -24 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 17,191 | -23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 17,214 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 17,213 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 17,223 | -39 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 17,262 | -36 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 17,298 | -17 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 17,315 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 17,323 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 17,331 | -12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 17,343 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 17,341 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 17,349 | +46 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 17,303 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 17,300 | first reading |
445 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 377 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 445 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,095 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 445 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 445 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#马来西亚资讯：古晋捣毁网恋诈骗窝点 8人落网专骗海外受害者 9月1日晚约11时，马来西亚砂拉越州古晋宋路一处公寓遭警方突袭，一个长期从事网络网恋诈骗的窝点被捣毁，8名嫌疑人被捕。 被捕的8人年龄介于21至26岁，包括2名马来西亚男子、1名马来西亚女子和5名外国男子。警方同时查获多台笔记本电脑、手机及其他电子设备。这批人员长期在公寓内从事网恋诈骗，主要寻找马来西亚境外受害者下手。 9月2日，8人被带往古晋推事法院，法院批准延扣4天。案件涉及诈骗及刑事共谋，警方继续调查这个诈骗团伙的具体运作情况。
#群友投稿：爱翻译偷钱！爱翻译偷钱！！！ 后台集体套取客户信息，使用小号私聊客户盗取资金，大家不要用爱翻译了。美国时间1号，我们集团大概三十几个人，办公室在不同国家、网络爱翻译同时掉了一批号。 一、异常掉号事件 美国时间9月1日下午3:54左右，我们集团位于不同国家、使用不同网络和时区的三十多名员工，其登录在“爱翻译”软件中的Telegram账号同时出现大规模掉线。员工重新登录后，多个账号又同时弹出“紧急修改两步验证密码”的提示。向爱翻译反馈这个问题，他竟然说中毒。我们集团的员工所在国家、网络和设备均不相同，用“员工设备中毒”很难合理解释如此集中、同步的异常。发现问题后，我们取消了相关登录，但是我们还没有联想到爱翻译要开始圈钱了。 二、客户随后遭到精准骚扰 紧接着，多个正在办理延期、续期或涉及较大金额业务的客户，开始被陌生Telegram账号主动添加和骚扰。这些陌生账号不但知道客户正在办理的业务，还能准确说出客户需要存入的…
#老挝资讯：乌多姆赛省捣毁3处涉赌诈窝点，抓获52名嫌疑人（含25名中国籍） 老挝媒体9月2日报道：8月25日至27日，乌多姆赛省公安厅联合属地县公安力量，对孟昏县、巴本县的3处窝点同步开展收网行动，抓获52名涉嫌网赌电诈的涉案人员。 涉案人员来自6个国家：中国籍25人、越南籍17人、老挝籍7人，马来西亚、缅甸、土耳其籍各1人。 现场查获台式电脑27台、笔记本电脑1台、手机21部以及3套星链（Starlink）卫星网络设备。 警方调查显示，该团伙此前在博胶省金三角经济特区活动，8月初分批转移至乌多姆赛省。部分人员从会晒乘船沿湄公河南下抵达巴本县，再转车前往洪县藏匿。 团伙在洪县纳洪村租下16间房屋，月租金约1亿基普（约合4450美元）。该团伙共有5名头目，负责人员调度、交通、住宿及生活安排，分别为中国籍陈贵、李义、李杰、钟建勇与土耳其籍陈高勇。（姓名均为音译） 窝点8月17日启用，仅8天，8月25日便被警方突击查处。…
#泰国资讯：曼谷警方 逮捕一名吸du后精神失常持刀闹事的中国公民 泰国曼谷素提山警局巡逻队昨日逮捕了一名吸毒后精神失常、持刀威胁他人的中国公民。据泰国警方通报，该名男子为MR. WANG，因吸食DU品后行为失控，持刀试图自残并威胁周围人员。 警方接报后迅速赶到现场，使用电击枪将其安全控制并逮捕 初步调查显示，该名中国公民还涉嫌在泰逾期居留（Overstay）。 目前，警方已安排对其进行必要的医疗检查，并将依法进一步处理。
#菲律宾资讯：严打网络犯罪：前7个月抓766人、救149人，81宗案件定罪 9月1日，菲律宾国家警察反网络犯罪组在奎松市克拉梅营公布2026年1月至7月打击网络犯罪数据。前7个月共开展818次行动，抓获766名嫌疑人，救出149名受害者，另有81宗案件取得定罪结果。 网络购物诈骗目前仍是菲律宾最常见的网络犯罪类型之一。 同场发布会上，警方还公布了一起已实名SIM卡非法交易案。8月24日，执法人员在菲律宾布拉干省奥班多展开诱捕行动，抓获一名26岁男子，并查获约400张已经完成实名登记的SIM卡。 案件起因是警方在网络巡查中发现，有人在社交媒体公开出售已实名SIM卡，以及已经完成认证的电子钱包账户。这类账号一旦流入黑市，可能被继续用于网络诈骗等违法活动。 针对实名SIM卡仍被大量转卖的问题，菲律宾警方提出修改现有登记制度，包括加强生物识别验证、限制个人持有SIM卡数量，以及收紧SIM卡转让和重新登记监管。 警方建议个人最…
#国内新闻 11岁女孩想免费领游戏皮肤，3小时被骗5万多元，警方追回3万元 9月1日，央视新闻披露湖北宜昌一起针对未成年人的游戏诈骗案。当地一名11岁女孩因为轻信“免费送游戏皮肤”，被骗子连续恐吓诱导，短短3个小时转出5万余元。 7月17日，女孩放暑假在家玩游戏时，看到“免费赠送游戏皮肤”的信息，随后添加所谓“客服”。对方先称女孩是未成年人，她的操作导致公司账户被冻结，接着又冒充公安人员，称其账号涉嫌违法，要求她必须配合处理。 骗子通过带有“公安背景”的视频画面制造紧张气氛，不断恐吓女孩，还要求她不要告诉父母。当天18时至21时，女孩按照对方指示操作父亲手机，两笔转账32700元，另外3张信用卡也被分多笔转走约25000元，累计被骗5万余元。 当天晚上，父亲发现女儿一直没有下楼吃饭，上楼后发现房门被反锁。开门时，女孩还在和所谓“公安人员”视频通话。父亲察觉不对后立即检查银行卡，发现钱已经被转走，随后马上报警。 宜昌警方…
#老挝资讯：2026年已抓获电诈嫌疑人超6200名 自2026年初至今，老挝全国加大打击网络犯罪及在线诈骗力度，已累计逮捕至少6200名来自多个国家的嫌疑人，其中中国籍占多数。 仅8月全老挝即抓获近900人。8月29日周末，警方突查万象赛色塔县两处地点，抓获139人并查获大批作案电子设备及违禁品；8月8日于塔銮湖专区清查网诈赌博团伙抓获261人。此前7月18日行动曾单次逮捕589人。目前警方正深入审讯以追查幕后主脑.
#泰国资讯：正式收紧免签政策，外国游客停留期限由60天缩短至30天 泰国政府近日正式公布新版免签规定，取消此前允许部分外国游客免签停留最长60天的政策，并将符合条件旅客的停留期限缩短至最多30天。 根据泰国内政部公布的新规，符合免签资格国家和地区的护照或旅行证件持有人，仍可无需提前申请签证入境泰国旅游，但单次免签停留时间将明显缩短。 与此同时，塞舌尔和毛里求斯旅客的免签停留期限被调整为最多15天。 泰国政府此前表示，此次调整主要基于国家安全、旅游经济、互惠原则以及简化不同免签制度等因素。 新规正式实施后，计划长期在泰国停留的外国游客需要更加注意签证期限及后续续签安排。 ======================== 【独家赞助商】【太古集团】 #体育 #世界杯 #五大联赛 #电子 #捕鱼 #真人 #彩票 #太古 #太古体育 #美加墨 ========================== 太古体育【合法博彩牌照】 👍新…
#柬埔寨资讯：金边警方突查涉嫌网络诈骗窝点，18名孟加拉国籍人员被拘留 9月1日 —— 据消息，当日，金边市奔格冷区行政当局在奔格冷区区长索克萨姆巴特（Sok Sambath）的带领下，会同奔格冷区警察局长及相关执法人员，对一处涉嫌与网络诈骗（Online Scam）活动有关的场所展开突击检查。 执法人员在现场进行检查并对相关区域实施封锁，同时拘留了18名孟加拉国籍人员，其中包括1名女性。 目前，相关人员及现场情况已由执法部门进一步调查，以核实是否涉及网络诈骗及其他违法活动。案件后续处理结果，有待有关部门进一步公布。 ======================== 【独家赞助商】【太古集团】 #体育 #世界杯 #五大联赛 #电子 #捕鱼 #真人 #彩票 #太古 #太古体育 #美加墨 ========================== 太古体育【合法博彩牌照】 👍新首充送🤝🤝🤝🤝 👍新用户包赔🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝 👍全网最高返水👍…
#男同投稿：一名尚未出柜男性的内心独白：我真的对生活感到疲惫了 请不要误会我。我有一份今年刚开始的稳定工作，而且适应得很好。我有很好的领导和同事，有几个朋友群体作为我的精神支柱，还有一个完整的家庭。 看清这一切后，尽管我非常渴望一段恋爱关系，我却总是会提醒并问自己：你真的配拥有吗？如果你找了一个男生并带他见家人，会怎样？他们肯定无法接受自己的儿子是这样的。 我知道，我最终需要走出“柜子”向女友坦白，但我不知道什么时候才是合适的时机？ 一方面我感到有些孤单，渴望被爱；但另一方面，我又不希望让女友失望。这就是为什么我在家里变得越来越孤僻和沉默。我不再怎么说话，也不怎么和女友一起吃晚饭了。即使和她吃完饭，我也回回到自己房间做自己的事。我试图远离她 那我该怎么办？交友软件？同志浴室？我听过很多关于这些平台和场所的恐怖故事，我还没有准备好去面对它们。有哪位前辈愿意给我一些建议吗？ ========================…
#币圈资讯：火币HTX突遭DDoS猛攻，黑客高调认领点名孙宇晨，币安此前已限制相关转账 8月31日，火币HTX遭遇DDoS攻击。孙宇晨随后确认平台服务已经恢复，用户资产未受影响，HTX已保存相关证据并向执法部门报案。 同一天，X账号“Hacker_Fuckvc”公开认领此次攻击，并直接点名孙宇晨，称此次出手是为了给他“一个教训”。 这次攻击发生之际，HTX与币安之间的资金往来本身已经受到限制。 币安早在8月14日就宣布，从8月23日起限制涉及HTX、EXMO等11家加密平台的相关交易。用户通过币安直接或间接向这些平台转账，交易可能被暂扣审查，相关钱包也可能受到限制。 币安此前给出的原因是监管和合规要求，这项限制早于此次DDoS攻击生效，并不是黑客攻击发生后临时采取的措施。 ======================== 【独家赞助商】【太古集团】 #体育 #世界杯 #五大联赛 #电子 #捕鱼 #真人 #彩票 #太古 …
#斯里兰卡新闻 一中国籍男子在港口城绑架杀人案后潜逃，警方发通缉 警方正请求公众提供协助，以追踪一名涉嫌与科伦坡港口城（Colombo Port City）另一起中国籍公民被绑架并杀害案有关的中国籍嫌疑人。 据警方透露，2026年7月23日，居住在科伦坡港口城区域的三名中国公民遭到袭击，其中一名受害者随后被绑架并杀害。 在有线索表明三名中国籍男子涉案后，科伦坡区犯罪调查局（Colombo District Crime Division）随即展开调查。 三名嫌疑人中的两人（年龄分别为35岁和43岁）已于8月28日在锡吉里耶（Sigiriya）警察辖区的一家旅馆内被逮捕。 警方表示，这两名嫌疑人将被移送至科伦坡地方法院受审。 目前警方正在持续开展调查以抓捕第三名嫌疑人，并呼吁公众积极提供有助于锁定其位置的信息。 如有相关线索，请拨打电话 071 859 1735 联系科伦坡区犯罪调查局主管警官（Officer-in-C…
Showing the 12 most recent of 445 posts we hold for @hqsj77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hqsj77 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“太古体育冠名/东南亚大事件/TG/真人/电子” (@hqsj77), 17,030 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hqsj77.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.