Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Высокоточка

@hpweapons

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

4,605subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001824727644
TypeChannel
Username@hpweapons
DescriptionОфициальный Telegram-канал Холдинга "Высокоточные комплексы" Госкорпорации Ростех
Created26 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hpweapons

Growth

4,6044,6054,604.56 Aug 2026, 01:00 — 4,604 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 04:01 — 4,604 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:15 — 4,605 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 01:006 Aug 2026, 14:15
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,604–4,605 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 14:154,605+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:014,604no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:004,604first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 4,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
565
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held18 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total10,171
Reactions total150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,110
Videos
646
Links
616

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
50s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6774.4%
👍2224.4%
11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC356 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @MT_GROUP5Video

➡️Почему логистика на фронте всё чаще уходит в темноту, и что об этом известно про НРТК Ночь на современном поле боя стала не помехой, а преимуществом для наземной робототехники: она резко снижает шанс, что технику обнаружат визуально или атакуют оптическим FPV-дроном. По данным аналитического издания, наземные роботы способны делать десятки грузовых рейсов к линии фронта за одну ночь, при этом такие платформы не то

🔥21👍1

9 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC532 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎯 Работает БМД-4М производства Холдинга «Высокоточные комплексы» Госкорпорации Ростех Военнослужащие Новороссийского гвардейского горного соединения ВДВ на боевых машинах десанта БМД-4М проводят интенсивные тренировки на полигоне в Запорожской области, повышая уровень профессиональной подготовки. Видео: МО РФ @hpweapons

🔥10👍3

9 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC476 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @MT_GROUP5Photo

❓Где заканчивается пульт и начинается ИИ: что происходит с автономностью наземных роботов Сегодня подавляющее большинство наземных робототехнических комплексов, включая российские, остаются в первую очередь дистанционно управляемыми машинами. По оценке аналитика CNA и старшего научного сотрудника CNAS Сэмюэла Бендетта, российские войска применяют для логистики, эвакуации и боевых задач такие платформы, как "Депеша-3

👍2🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC510 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @MT_GROUP5Photo

❓Зачем военному роботу мирная профессия: как «Депеша-3» осваивает гражданские задачи Идея переносить наземных роботов из боевых задач в мирные на самом деле логична и уже не нова. Ещё до «Депеши-3» в России пошли по этому пути с семейством «Уран»: сапёрный робот «Уран-6» с 2020 года разминирует местность, а «Уран-14» тушит пожары, в том числе на складах боеприпасов, где человеку находиться просто опасно. Логика прос

🔥4

7 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC841 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎯 Профессии «Высокоточки» в фото Сегодня рассказываем о том, чем занимается на производстве закройщик. На Курганмашзаводе этот специалист создает основу будущих изделий для комплектации машин. По заданным меркам и лекалам закройщик из разных материалов вырезает основу для пошива тентов и чехлов, сумочек и карманов, ковриков и шторок. Так, на чехлы и облицовку подушек для сидений идет льняная парусина, кресла для в

🔥5👍4

7 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC622 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎯 Специальное конструкторское бюро «Турбина» Холдинга «Высокоточные комплексы» отмечает 56-ю годовщину со дня основания Отсчёт истории предприятия ведётся с 1962 года, когда на Челябинском тракторном заводе был образован конструкторский отдел «6». Перед коллективом стояла масштабная задача — создание газотурбинных двигателей для наземного транспорта. Вскоре Постановлением ЦК КПСС и Совета Министров СССР отделу было

🔥9👍3

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC466 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rostecruVideo

🌿 Медведь, барс или зубр? Ростех голосует, присоединяйтесь! Неожиданно, но это не шутка. В Красной книге России – больше тысячи видов растений и животных. Они могут обитать в дикой природе, а могут жить буквально у нас под ногами и летать над крышами городских домов. Но часто ли мы задумываемся о том, что многим из них нужна наша помощь, пока они не оказались на грани исчезновения? Самые уязвимые виды вошли в проек

🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC724 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎯Холдинг «Высокоточные комплексы» ударно выступил на «Времени первых» Наша команда завоевала 9 медалей на пятом корпоративном чемпионате Госкорпорации Ростех «Время первых». Таким образом, в этом году «Высокоточные комплексы» обновили собственный рекорд по числу наград за время участия в чемпионате. «Время первых» — это чемпионат Госкорпорации Ростех, направленный на развитие работников как главного актива и ценнос

🔥9

5 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC558 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @MT_GROUP5Photo

Один спасённый боец — уже победа: как наземные роботы меняют цену человеческой жизни на фронте Масштаб роботизации в российской армии в 2026 году выражается уже не единичными образцами, а серийным производством и системными решениями. По данным исследования, в России в течение 2026 года зафиксировано более 32 моделей наземных робототехнических комплексов минимум от 20 производителей, при этом не менее 20 типов подтв

🔥7

4 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC606 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎯 «Высокоточные комплексы» Госкорпорации Ростех заняли второе место по итогам III этапа Фестиваля по командным видам спорта ВФСО «Трудовые резервы» В командном зачёте среди организаций АО «КБП» заняло первое место. Соревнования проходили в Туле. Наши спортсмены из КБП и ЦКБА достойно выступили и привезли медали, завоёванные в следующих видах спорта: АО «КБП» 🥇 Футбол 6×6 🥇 Компьютерный спорт (CS2) 🥇 🥇🥉🥉Перетягиван

🔥10👍5

4 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈474 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @newm_newsVideo

🌟 Кто знает, возможно, именно с таких встреч начинаются большие открытия. Ростех, ЦНИИАГ и «Высокоточка» познакомили ребят с миром современных технологий. Смотрите в НЬЮМ ТАСС! ✔️ Подпишись на НЬЮМ в МАКС

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hpweapons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,888 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

BMD-4 (en.wikipedia.org)
“…web | title=Высокоточка | website=Telegram | url=https://t.me/hpweapons/935 | language=ru | ref={{sfnref | Telegram}} |…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Высокоточка” (@hpweapons), 4,605 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hpweapons.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.