Ученье - свет, а неученье - тьма. Просто солнечная мотивация нам всем на сегодня ✌️
❤6

Channel
@howyoudoing_english
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001917541807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @howyoudoing_english |
| Description | 🥐Аня в Париже🥐 Про английский, кино и круассаны |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/howyoudoing_english |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 32 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 32 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 28 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
43 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 44.2% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 11.6% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2025 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ученье - свет, а неученье - тьма. Просто солнечная мотивация нам всем на сегодня ✌️
❤6
Завтра Париж утонет в митингах и забастовках. Поэтому очень мирное фото на память✌️
❤10💔1
Кому интересно, 5 лет назад фонд Sandy Hook Promise выпустил социальный ролик под названием Back-To-School Essentials ( Все самое нужное к школе). Цель - привлечь внимание к проблеме открытого доступа к оружию. Ролик не для слабонервных, поэтому оставляю только ссылку
😨1
Weapons | 2025 Еще одна отличная страшилка про черную магию и не только. Второй мистический хоррор от того самого Зака Креггера, который снял Barbarian. Уже заявочка! When all but one child from the same class mysteriously vanish on the same night at exactly the same time, a community is left questioning who or what is behind their disappearance. all but one - все кроме одного mysteriously vanish - таинственным об…
🔥4👍1
Together | Вместе Как я уже писала, август подарил нам шикарные ужасы/триллеры. Together - один из них. Body horror, на секундочку! Сложный, но интересный жанр. Понравилось все: криповая идея, атмосфера, персонажи, чуток триггеров для парочек. There is something about it! А еще порадовала игра Дэйва Франко и Элисон Бри. Все не могла понять, как так натурально можно играть пару🤔. Spoiler: оказалось, в реальной жизн…
❤1👍1
Bring Her Back Новинка в жанре хоррор из Австралии. Идея та же, о которой я рассказывала в предыдущем посте, - ритуал/колдовство/черная магия🔮. Но ключевая боль картины - непринятие утраты. Как будто бы новое прочтение "Кладбища домашних животных" Стивена Кинга, но с более темной стороны. A brother and sister uncover a terrifying ritual at the secluded home of their new foster mother. a brother and sister - брат и …
👏1
Что уже смотрели?
Shares as published, totalling 33%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Такое чувство, что в хоррор ветке новый тренд - Witchcraft. Честно, не помню какай-то отдельный период, когда выходило столько фильмом про witches как сейчас. Причем, речь идет не только о стандартной бабке с метлой, а о поклонении злу в разных формах. Поделюсь старыми картинами, которые считаю лучшими в этой тематике: 🧙♀️The Blair Witch Project | 1999. История о трех студентах, которые исчезают в лесах штата во …
❤2😍1
Wonders never cease! В русскоязычном прокате фильм Materialists (Материалисты) стал Материалисткой.💅🏻 Видимо, прокатчики посчитали, что такое название считывается обществом лучше. 😐 I don't get it. Зачем изменять оригинальное название? Это как переписать название романа за автора. Теряется весь смысл... Long story short, картина про трех ordinary people, которые ищут любовь. Главная героиня - a matchmaker (короче, …
💘5👏1🔥1
Ну как минимум должно быть красиво! По цветонастроению Frankenstein похож на своего брата Crimson Peak | 2015 (того же Гильермо дель Торо)
🔥2👍1
Что за сумасшедший cast? Frankenstein by Guillermo del Toro😱 cast - актерский состав
👍4
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @howyoudoing_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что уже смотрели?
Shares as published, totalling 33%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2025 to 3 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Howyoudoing_English” (@howyoudoing_english), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/howyoudoing_english.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.