Nikita Sharma ๐คค Must Join: @celebs_empire
๐15๐ฅ11โค1

Channel
@hot_actress_model_pics
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
26,511subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001788039416 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hot_actress_model_pics |
| Description | Your daily dose of glamour, beauty & stunning celebrity vibes! ๐ฅ HD Photos โข Edits โข Reels ๐ฅ Bollywood โข South ๐ Curated collections of the hottest actresses โค๏ธ Join for daily glam, stay for the vibes! Buy Ads: https://telega.io/c/hot_actress_model_pics |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hot_actress_model_pics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 26,511 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 26,521 | -40 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 26,561 | +65 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 26,496 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 26,493 | -34 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 26,527 | +26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 26,501 | -55 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 26,556 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 26,546 | +25 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 26,521 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 26,521 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (5 August 2026 โ 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 82,571 |
| Reactions total | 1,943 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 18 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,943 reactions across 40 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฅ | 702 | 36.1% | |
| ๐ | 410 | 21.1% | |
| โค | 354 | 18.2% | |
| ๐ญ | 234 | 12.0% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 81 | 4.17% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 80 | 4.12% | |
| ๐ | 22 | 1.13% | |
| ๐พ | 19 | 0.978% | |
| ๐ | 16 | 0.823% | |
| ๐ | 13 | 0.669% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 0.206% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 0.206% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 0.103% | |
| โก | 1 | 0.051% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.051% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 1,943reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Nikita Sharma ๐คค Must Join: @celebs_empire
๐15๐ฅ11โค1
Vedhika ๐ฅฐ๐ Must Join: @celebs_empire
๐ฅ20๐11โค3โคโ๐ฅ1
Rakul Preet ๐๐ฅต Must Join: @celebs_empire
๐18๐ฅ15โค9๐พ7โคโ๐ฅ3๐ฅฐ2๐2
Kaushani ๐ฉต๐ฅฐ Must Join: @celebs_empire
๐17๐ฅ12๐ญ8โค3โคโ๐ฅ3๐3๐ฅฐ1
Reem Shaikh ๐ป Must Join: @celebs_empire
๐ฅ33๐ญ6๐5โคโ๐ฅ2๐ฅฐ2
Megha Shukla ๐ฅต๐ป Must Join: @celebs_empire
โค19๐ญ15๐15๐ฅ15๐ฅฐ2
Simran Kaur ๐ป Must Join: @celebs_empire
๐ฅ24โค10๐ญ7๐5โคโ๐ฅ2๐ฅฐ1
Mimi Chakraborty ๐๐คฉ Must Join: @bolly_temptations
โค15๐ฅ13๐6๐ญ4๐ฅฐ1
Vani Kapoor ๐ฅ Must Join: @celebs_empire
โค16โคโ๐ฅ12๐ญ11๐7๐ฅ7๐ฅฐ1
Simran Kaur ๐ฅต Must Join: @celebs_empire
๐22๐ญ8โค7๐ฅ5โคโ๐ฅ1๐ฅฐ1
Amyra Dastur ๐ฅฐ Must Join: @celebs_empire
โคโ๐ฅ14๐ฅ12๐ญ10โค8๐5๐ฅฐ2๐2
Suhana Khan ๐ฅต๐ Must Join: @celebs_empire
๐ฅ23โค16๐ญ9๐2๐ฅฐ2โคโ๐ฅ1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @hot_actress_model_pics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 115,510 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฅ๐ฅต Hot Actresses ๐ฅต ๐ฅโ (@hot_actress_model_pics), 26,511 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hot_actress_model_pics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.