Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Убежище Хости

Channel

Убежище Хости

@hosti1338

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

163subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001426790149
TypeChannel
Username@hosti1338
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hosti1338

Growth

162163162.57 August 2026 — 162 subscribers8 August 2026 — 162 subscribers22 August 2026 — 163 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 162–163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 23:57163+1
8 Aug 2026, 17:01162no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:36162first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.1%
avg views ÷ 163 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (8 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total255
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4959.8%
🐳1518.3%
👍1113.4%
custom 531470200219685480744.88%
🥰22.44%
🤣11.22%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC70 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤪 Не ожидал, что по верхнему опросу, начнется такая ярая борьба но в итоге, все же выиграл вариант чтобы сходил, на самом деле это понятно почему такое негодование, после трейлера у многих получились смешанные эмоции и уже было отрицание идти в кино, но все же я сходил на него за вас и уже полчаса назад оттуда вышел 😆 Про сам фильм, предысторию придется ждать ближе к середине фильма, то е

🐳43

3 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC100 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Сказал бы мне кто ни будь 3 месяца назад, что сегодня они решили добавить в Steam, в итоге у меня сейчас две копии которая валяется в VK Play которую до сих пор не включал и играть уже там не буду и вернуть средства не могу (правило 2-х недель после покупки уже не работают), ну лан взял со скидкой так что не так печально что потратил и теперь вторая копия находится в Steam 🤨🤨 Ну зато коллекция пополнила

3🐳1🤣1🥰1

26 Jul 2026, 05:23 UTC180 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Недавно задумался о создании таблицы, чтобы было легче смотреть мои оценки а также посты с критикой по интересующим фильмам/мультфильмам/сериалам и играм а также под таблицами три вкладки 🤨 🖥ФИЛЬМЫ-МУЛЬТФИЛЬМЫ 🎞СЕРИАЛЫ 💣ИГРЫ Также оставил сбоку памятку, может в будущем более лучше сделаю но пока, то что я хотел сделать, я сделал, надеюсь кому-то облегчил поиск, если что посты так и остаются просто я т

6🐳1custom 53147020021968548071

23 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC204 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 Редко я в последнее время когда-то завтракаю, обычно ближе к обеду, но 3 дня назад решил сделать яичницу было норм но сегодня утром решил снова их сделать и во время разбивания не успел среагировать и одно яйцо оказалось тухлым, так скажем черноватым ну и пришлось быстро смывать и мыть сковородку 🥚 И как бы это у меня за всю мою жизнь такого не было и созрел вопрос, а стало ли так частым явлением что пе

10custom 53147020021968548073🐳1👍1

20 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC218 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Поздравляю победителей 🥳

8🐳2

20 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC181 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: Получили подарки 👍 ✔️Проверить результаты

👍2🐳1

19 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC213 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Закрытие сегодняшнего ЧМ-2026 раздаю троих футбольных мишек ⚽️ Итоги в 12:00 по МСК ⚽️

8🐳1🥰1

11 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC302 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍81🐳1

8 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC320 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🅱️🔠🅱️ 🔠🔠🔠🅰️🔠🔠🔠🅰️🔠🔠🔠🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Пока параллельно прохожу трилогию мафии, решил понемногу проходить игры которые мне еще давно предлагали, и вот одна из них которая многим подарила детство а именно вселенная Губки Боба 😯 Сегодня прекрасный день для Губки Боба, ведь сегодня Мистер Крабс, объявит кто будет управляющим в "Красти Крабс" и в глубине души, Губка Боб уверен, что он достойный кандидат и жизнь ему кажетс

10🐳1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @hosti1338. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Убежище Хости” (@hosti1338), 163 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hosti1338.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.