Channel
@horsesignal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,158subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001404830961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @horsesignal |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/horsesignal |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 1,158 | +9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 1,149 | +10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 1,139 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:13 | 1,133 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 1,135 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 1,140 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 1,141 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 1,143 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 1,144 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 1,143 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 1,145 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 1,145 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 50.0% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
《流浪狗》 作曲 ： 中島美雪 作詞 ： 林振波 改詞 ： 波囝 演唱 ： 小肥波 從前 常搭膊 落快操同騎練傾傾講講 舊日老苗不睬不理 但我也有計與他訴天光 賽馬 連場直播 犯眾憎仍獲邀官方去講 但是耳機不聽不理 獨自看透說破「真話」變失當 讓我冬天講多一次吧 沒有收益我怎去賭馬 回來吧 流浪狗 讓我再次責斥詭詐 肥撚輸清 幕後賭錢必要罵 亦會加緊針對拉馬 訴心聲 仍要「叉」 Warning我不嬲收慣 冇得撈 唔會瓜 收工我香檳講價
❤2
官台公然批評南非造馬？請埋啲咩人上去評述架。。。
🤣5
「叫馬會加多一場！！！！」
https://t.me/HongKongHorseNews
🚨就有關本系統 当系統に関しまして🚨 今晚正式畫上2025-2026年馬季的句號！ 《競馬賠率研究所 Horse Signal》一直為大家提供最赤裸裸的賠率時序變化以及創設獨一無二的評分系統及AI予想，亦沒有預計能得到大家的支持。再次感謝訂閱者及支持者的信任！我們將： 1️⃣：繼續在來季開始前進行研究，改善現有功能及引進更多新功能，讓會員繼續能揭開這個一站式綜合賽馬平台的數據科學力量！ 2️⃣：並於2026-2027本地馬季開鑼日與各位再會！🙇
Thx bobby
Photo, posted without a caption
田草有美麗同享 谷草點冇人和家興
Thx bobby
Thanks bobby
勁波比
Thx bobby
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @horsesignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“競馬賠率研究所 HorseSignal” (@horsesignal), 1,158 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/horsesignal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.