Channel
@horoscopoetica
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
131subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001424404044 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @horoscopoetica |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/horoscopoetica |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 131 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 134 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:46 | 135 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 138 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 139 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 139 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
11 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 54.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 18.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2023 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
https://www.astrologiahoy.net/p/curso-avanzado.html aprendé mucho sobre técnicas predictivas en mi curso de significadores astrológicos y herramientas avanzadas de pronóstico
❤2
Signed Nicolas Boque
Pregunta: Si en la profeccion anual se activa un planeta que rige dos casas en el natal habrá temas de esas dos casas? Siempre he escuchado que se activa una casa por año .. pero a lo mejor ese planeta también rige otra casa más. Aquí las dos casas serían importantes? O solo la que activa el año? Respuesta: La profección anual (30° x año) activa más bien un Signo que una Casa cada año. Por ejemplo, si tengo Ascende…
❤1
Signed Nicolas Boque
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3🤔1
Signed Nicolas Boque
incluso desde la perspectiva astronómica observacional del tránsito del sol por las constelaciones (que, paradójicamente, es inobservable), ni siquiera empieza a transitar por las estrellas de Aries el 14 de abril cuando se supone que entra en el signo de Aries sideral, sino aproximadamente una semana después... es más que evidente que lo que usamos en astrología son fundamentalmente los Signos, ya sean sidereos o t…
Signed Nicolas Boque
fin de la discusion
Signed Nicolas Boque
la disonancia cognitiva
Signed Nicolas Boque
Los problemas del tipo "quién tiene razón y quién se equivoca" generalmente parten de usar un mismo nombre para cosas con distinta definición
Signed Nicolas Boque
La astrología "vedica" y los vedas son cosas distintas... si los "vedicos" hicieran la astrologia que dicen los vedas, deberían usar sólo la luna, obviar el ascendente y todos los demás planetas
Signed Nicolas Boque
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nicolas Boque
Audio de Nicolas Boque Psincronautica
Signed Nicolas Boque
parte 2
Signed Nicolas Boque
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @horoscopoetica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PSINCRONAUTICA” (@horoscopoetica), 131 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/horoscopoetica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.