Channel
@hongzhajiggg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,826subscribers
+481 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001809015616 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hongzhajiggg |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hongzhajiggg |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 4,826 | -1,486 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 6,312 | -268 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 6,580 | -230 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:33 | 6,810 | +2,750 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 4,060 | -164 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 4,224 | -33 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 4,257 | -27 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 4,284 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 4,295 | -45 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 4,340 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 4,345 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 10 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 87.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀😀😀😀你被人伤害过而无从发泄么。 😀😀😀😀你被人欺骗过而无从弥补么。 😀😀😀😀你被人骚扰过而无从报复么。 😀😀😀😀是否为别人欠债不还而烦恼吗。 😀😀😀😀是不是想骚扰下你上司呢。 😀😀😀😀是不是想骚扰下你老板呢。 😀😀😀😀是不是想骚扰下你竞争对手呢。 😀😀😀目的效果😀😀😀 🤣不断轰炸骚扰 使对方长时间应对电话铃声而苦脑，让对方手机处于繁忙状态中，达到别人无法打进来，无法接业务，长时间下去只能换号码，如果对方手机号码很重要，那对方损失惨重！ ➡️👩💻👩💻👩💻👩💻 📱 ： @hongzhaji_VIP
❤1
单独电话效果展示 📱客服： @hongzhaji_VIP
📌2026.4.12 ➡️短信轰炸✅ 🆘呼到你关机为止 🆘呼到你没电为止 🆘呼到你拔手机卡 ➡️电话轰炸✅ 🆘高密度高频率排列 🆘电话刚挂电话又响 🆘模拟亲戚朋友电话 ✅不要打架 打输丢人 打赢赔钱 来炸吧！ ✅轰炸电话📵📵轰炸短信☠️☠️轰炸机 📱客服： @hongzhaji_VIP
❤1
🎆🎆🎆🎆🎆🎆🎆🎆 已更新到最新版本！！！ 🤔操作简单王者并非偶然实力打造非凡真正的黑科技， 为脆弱的你保驾护航！ 🤗炸小三😡炸仇人 🤗炸黑心老板😡炸不良上司 🤗炸欠钱不还😡炸情敌 🤯炸一切让自己不爽之人🤗 【😫可短信可电话😫】 支持测试有一种速度叫根本停不下来！ 欢迎测试效果秒杀全网一切垃圾.套路产品 😛😝😝🤩 😛😝😝🤩 😜😗😜🤨😱🥳：点击联系唯一客服
电话闹钟效果更新
电话☎️闹钟增加短信接口（短+电）同时进行 TG客服: @hongzhaji_VIP
电话轰炸己升级 稳定输出 支持测试 满意再购买 真实电话轰炸吊打全网 认准【无名 强一手☎️电话短信轰炸】 在线客服 @hongzhaji_VIP
❤1
电话闹钟效果更新 后面几天会陆陆续续更新线路 在线客服 @hongzhaji_VIP
新品电话闹钟已上线 实测有几十个电话 已上架，欢迎体验 购买联系在线客服 @hongzhaji_VIP
❤1
电话闹钟更新了一个定时任务提交功能！！！ 购买联系在线客服 @hongzhaji_VIP
新品电话闹钟已上线 实测有几十个电话 已上架，欢迎体验 购买联系在线客服 @hongzhaji_VIP
😀😀😀全新电话轰炸机🤬 😂电话接口升级短轰炸频率增加😂 📈接单轰炸、短信轰炸、电话轰炸📉 短信轰炸 轰炸机 呼死你 来来来 一直在线 需要的来！！！ 😃😀😃😀😃 @hongzhaji_VIP 😣
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hongzhajiggg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“电话轰炸-短信轰炸-手机轰炸-电话闹钟-轰炸短信-轰炸电话-轰炸手机” (@hongzhajiggg), 4,826 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hongzhajiggg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.