Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дотошный чтец

Channel

Дотошный чтец

@honest_reader

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

240subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001710707332
TypeChannel
Username@honest_reader
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/honest_reader

Growth

24011 Aug 2026, 08:47 — 240 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 13:53 — 240 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 08:4711 Aug 2026, 13:53
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 239–241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:53240no change
11 Aug 2026, 08:47240first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13236.6%
👍10829.9%
🔥8423.3%
😁133.60%
custom 530797029379540642292.49%
💯71.94%
🤔51.39%
👀20.554%
💔10.277%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 3 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @honest_reader. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2025 to 3 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2025, 14:20 UTC130 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026

😭 Ааааа! Как же меня штормит — в первую очередь как лингвиста и корректора — не только от новых «трендов», но и от «новых правил» печатного русского языка. 💁Дорогие мои, есть три варианта постановки «черточек» в печатном тексте. Дефис. Ставится внутри сложносоставного слова, используется для присоединения частиц, при сокращении слов: юго-запад, чуть-чуть, кол-во. Тире. Это числовые диапазоны: 5–7 раз. Длинное тир

🔥9👍62

31 Oct 2025, 16:40 UTC91 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Давно не получала отзывы на свои книги. А оказывается, мои истории продолжают жить и находят отклик у читателей. Соня, спасибо огромное за внимание к книге и чудесный отзыв ❤📒 А вы читали «Год Дракона»? Какое послевкусие оставила эта история? Кстати, книгу можно приобрести у меня. Осталось несколько экземпляров 📒

👍75💯3

31 Oct 2025, 16:40 UTC111 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Здравствуйте! Оставляю отзыв о вашей книге "Год дракона" Это бесподобно, я влюбилась в эту историю 💔 Она небольшая, так что для любителей годного чтива отличный компаньон на вечер. Мне безумно нравится сочетания реальных времён и мистики. Слог и описание ПРОСТО ВЫСШИЙ ПИЛОТАЖ! Описание атмосферы так и погружает в этот мир холодного и завораживающего Байкала, а в мыслях сам отбиваешь незамысловатый ритм на бубне и слы

8👍6custom 53079702937954064225

1 Oct 2025, 10:47 UTC232 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

👉 Девочки и мальчики, давно ничего не писала. Сегодня садимся с Артемием за новую книгу Идея на мой взгляд интересная и актуальная. Что из этой затеи получится, увидим через пару месяцев 📒✏️📒

🔥7👍61

14 Sept 2025, 06:42 UTC160 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Всем доброго воскресного утра! 🌞🌷 Давненько я здесь не была, все больше творю в студии ARTiqLab[AI] Сейчас пролистывала посты, не смогла не поделиться здесь 🌼 https://t.me/nedelina_aiphoto/715

7👍4😁3

2 Jul 2025, 15:54 UTC227 views19 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

❤️❤️❤️❤️ «Литературный призрак» Дэвид Митчелл 1999г. Дочитала. 1/3 книги по диагонали. Мой вердикт: ни о чем. Большая прелюдия к «Облачному атласу». Та же структура, те же пересечения судеб, те же персонажи (например, Кавендиш) и те же символы (родимое пятно в виде кометы). Не могу объяснить такую высокую оценку критиков. Буду рада вашим комментариям 😄 Книгу дарю за доставку. Возможно, вы найдете в ней более глу

🔥114👀2👍2

17 Jun 2025, 11:07 UTC208 views27 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026

Пришлось добавить писателей к списку людей, которым нельзя верить. Писатели все сочиняют. Дэвид Митчелл. Литературный призрак Прочитала половину. Пока не могу сказать ничего определенного. Митчелла надо читать до конца… А вы что сейчас читаете?

🔥147👍6

31 May 2025, 04:58 UTC292 views44 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @laukhinareadschannelPhoto

Отличная новость для любителей книг. Промокод DRMIF20 дает скидку 50% на сайте МИФа до конца июня. Окнижимся? 📚

25👍10🔥8💔1

30 May 2025, 20:52 UTC176 views40 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Робот с низким искусственным интеллектом молча глумится над ней, пока она пытается составить слово из восьми символов, включающее заглавную букву и цифру, а потом и вовсе оттаптывается, попросив отмечать квадратики с самолетами, чтобы доказать роботу, что она не робот. «Шум» Рои Хен современные реалии Знакомо?))

👍18🔥10😁102

30 May 2025, 08:40 UTC150 views33 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А вот полная возмущения рецензия эксперта лайвлиба 🤓 Куда смотрят издатели? Есть, есть в самиздате достойные авторы и крепкие произведения. Вот один из таких примеров. Прежде всего, стоит отметить, что текст удивительно кинематографичен. Он словно сам просится на экран, и я не могла не подумать о том, как бы это выглядело в виде сценария. Автор действительно потрудилась над созданием лора, и, несмотря на то что эт

22👍6🤔5

30 May 2025, 08:15 UTC120 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Всем приветы ✌️ Был запрос на отзыв по книге «Год Дракона» Сделала подборочку из чисто мужских отзывов 😎 "Год дракона" - красивая легенда, интересно было читать, сюжет супер, поразило отношение Оюн к тому что дракон убил всю деревню, чисто буддийское видимо сознание у девочки, восприняла как стихийное бедствие. Как фанату эпического фэнтези (типа " Ведьмак") хотелось дракона конечно "замочить" Хорошо что он оказал

12👍8🔥4💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @honest_reader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 744,562 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дотошный чтец” (@honest_reader), 240 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/honest_reader.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.