Channel
@honchoshow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,880subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001731267677 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @honchoshow |
| Description | نظرات و تجربیات شخصی هانچو. لطفاً بدون ذکر منبع کپی نکنید سوددهی شما توی این کانال نیست،فقط در ژورنال شخصی خودتونه. توی کانال توصیه مالی وجود نداره و تحقیقات خودتون رو انجام بدین. ادمین : @naviit --- @honchart @fundcho --- x.com/Honchofx |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/honchoshow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 7,880 | +14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 7,866 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 7,882 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 7,883 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 7,883 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 51,323 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @honchoshow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#فارغازچارت تا حالا به این فکر کردی که چند درصد از ضررهایی که خوردی، دقیقاً سراغت اومدن وقتی که فک میکردی داری "حرفهای" رفتار میکنی؟ وقتی مدام چارت رو چک میکردی، توی تایمفریمهای مختلف زوم میکردی، دنبال تأییدیه جدید میگشتی، یا بدتر از همه، یه حرکت کوچیک بازار رو بهونه کردی تا زودتر از موعد از معامله خارج شی یا بیدلیل وارد شی. جالبه بدونین مغز ما یه سوگیری خطرناک داره به اسم "سوگیری اقدام". یعنی ما از بچگی …
📊 سه انتخاب برتر تریدرهای ایرانی 📊سرمایهگذار برتر 📱وبسایت 📱 تلگرام 📱 یوتیوب 📱 اینستاگرام
Photo, posted without a caption
#همراهباچارت #Us30 case study 11/08/2026
#فارغازچارت سختترین مرحلهی معاملهگری، لحظهایست که میدانی داری اشتباه میکنی و دقیقاً میدانی چرا، اما انگار دستات به کلیدواژهی «توقف» نمیرسد. این تناقض، ریشه در یک خطای شناختی ظریف دارد: «خودآگاهیِ منفعل» در برابر «خودتنظیمیِ فعال». تو نقشهی ذهنیات را میبینی، نقاط کور را تشخیص میدهی، حتی پیشبینی میکنی که کدام تصمیم به ضرر میانجامد. اما این آگاهی، بهتنهایی تبدیل به «کنش» نمیشود، چون مغز معاملهگر …
#فارغازچارت اگر هنوز فکر میکنی تریدر شدن یعنی رسیدن به یک نقطهی پایان، تو هنوز واردِ بازی نشدی. تریدر بودن یک وضعیتِ هویتیِ در حالِ تکامله، نه یک مدال برای پایانِ کار. تو با انتخابِ این راه، واردِ پروسهی بیانتهای مدیریتِ ذهن شدی. هر روز با نسخهای از خودت طرفی که دیروز نشناختیاش؛ گاهی طماع، گاهی ترسو، گاهی بیحوصله. ذهن تو همزمان هم سرمایهات است و هم بزرگترین تهدیدت. هیچ استراتژیای بدونِ ظرفیتِ روانی برای…
#فارغازچارت ذهن تو در لحظات بحرانی ترید، تبدیل به یک ماشین بقا میشود. وقتی قیمت به ضرر تو حرکت میکند، بخشی از مغزت که مسئول درد و تهدید است، فعال میشود و تنها یک فرمان صادر میکند: فرار کن. وسوسهٔ جابهجا کردن استاپ لاس، چیزی نیست جز همان واکنش اولیهٔ فرار. درست در همین نقطه است که مسیر یک تریدر منضبط از یک تریدر احساسی جدا میشود. تو میتوانی از این سیگنال بقا، برعکس استفاده کنی. هر بار که صدایی در سرت گفت است…
قسمت هشتم از فصل سوم پادکست «#فارغازچارت» 📌در این قسمت، ، به بررسی زندگی و آموزههای اد سیکوتا، جادوگر بازار و پیشگام معاملهگری سیستماتیک میپردازیم که با تکیه بر مدیریت ریسک سختگیرانه و دنبال کردن روندها، به موفقیتهای افسانهای دست یافت . سیکوتا معتقد است بازار مانند یک آینه عمل کرده و هر تریدر دقیقاً همان چیزی را که در ناخودآگاهش میخواهد از آن دریافت میکند؛ بنابراین کلید پیروزی در انضباط شخصی و غلبه بر منیت …
#فارغازچارت باور کن، ترید با ریسکبهریوارد بالا، بیشتر از آنکه استراتژی باشد، یک مسئلهی روانی است. نه اینکه شما اشتباه میکنید، بلکه مغزتان دارد فریب یک توهم را میخورد. جواد توی اسپیس دیشبش درست اشاره کرد که این سبک ترید چالشبرانگیز است. اما بیایید لایههای پنهان آن را واکاوی کنیم. وقتی کسی ریسکبهریوارد ۱ به ۵ یا بالاتر میگیرد، در یکی از این سه وضعیت قرار دارد: ۱. هیچ نقطهی خروجی در ذهنش نیست؛ یعنی ناخو…
#فارغازچارت توی بدترین نقطهٔ تریدینگت کی کنارت بود؟ هیچکس. این رو که میگم، نمیخوام ترحم برانگیز باشه یا از تنهایی یه قهرمان قصه بسازم. میخوام یه سازوکار دقیق روانی رو برات باز کنم که شاید خودت هم دقیق نفهمیدی چطور گرفتارت کرده. وقتی در اوج ضرر و شکست بودی، یه نیروی قدرتمند نگهت داشت: تصویر آینده. تصویری که توش فقط خودت نبودی، آدمهای دور و برت هم بودن. این تصویر بهت میگفت «اگه ادامه بدی، نه فقط زندگی خودت، که…
Video, posted without a caption
#فارغازچارت کلمهها همیشه از پسِ بیانِ کاملِ یک تجربه برنمیآیند، اما شاید نزدیکترین توصیف این باشد: برای بهتر شدن در ترید، باید انگیزههای پنهان پشتِ ورودت به بازار را پیدا کنی و خنثیشان کنی. اگر ناخودآگاه به دنبال بازسازیِ کودکیای هستی که در آن دیده نشدی، هر پوزیشن تبدیل به صحنهای برای اثبات خود میشود و هر ضرر، تکرار همان طردشدگیِ قدیمی. اگر بازار را محلی برای جبران کمبودهایت میبینی، سود دیگر سود نیست، تبدی…
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @honchoshow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 130,463 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فارغ از چارت” (@honchoshow), 7,880 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/honchoshow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.