Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Домик Хоникса 🖤

Channel

Домик Хоникса 🖤

@hon9xx

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,541subscribers

-252 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002179831615
TypeChannel
Username@hon9xx
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hon9xx

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3016,7956,5487 August 2026 — 6,793 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,792 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,784 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,793 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,795 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,771 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,743 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,714 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,690 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,644 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,608 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,550 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,498 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,466 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,366 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,301 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,537 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,520 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,495 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,500 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,490 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,487 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,552 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,541 subscribers6,5417 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net -252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,227–6,869 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 14:176,541-11
31 Oct 2026, 03:406,552+65
28 Oct 2026, 14:146,487-3
25 Oct 2026, 06:096,490-10
22 Oct 2026, 02:176,500+5
18 Oct 2026, 16:286,495-25
15 Oct 2026, 14:196,520-17
12 Oct 2026, 16:496,537+236
5 Oct 2026, 16:196,301-65
28 Sept 2026, 00:166,366-100
18 Sept 2026, 11:556,466-32
14 Sept 2026, 12:376,498-52
10 Sept 2026, 15:576,550-58
5 Sept 2026, 14:586,608-36
2 Sept 2026, 02:326,644-46
30 Aug 2026, 09:066,690-24
27 Aug 2026, 11:346,714-29
24 Aug 2026, 08:586,743-28
20 Aug 2026, 12:266,771-24
17 Aug 2026, 14:376,795first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
121.6%
avg views ÷ 6,541 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,950
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held34 (6 May 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total47,710
Reactions total624
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
30
Videos
21
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,183 reactions across 34 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,21553.0%
👍62815.0%
🤬3548.46%
🔥1573.75%
🤣962.30%
🤯932.22%
❤‍🔥882.10%
👏761.82%
💘671.60%
🥰531.27%
🎃521.24%
💔360.861%
🍌350.837%
😍310.741%
😁260.622%
🙉230.55%
🗿200.478%
💊150.359%
🤔140.335%
✍120.287%
16 further kinds922.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 22:07 UTC≈3,790 views63 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Вы просили - мы сделали 🎃 Дарим скидку 15% по промокоду Halloween Он действует до 8 числа - успейте воспользоваться. Промокод только для подписчиков этого канала. Больше нигде его публиковать не будем, пусть останется между нами 🫡

❤51👍5🤬4🤯2💔1

28 Oct 2026, 14:14 UTC≈7,910 views191 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🎃🔥🎃

❤123🎃52🥰6🎅5🔥5

20 Oct 2026, 11:19 UTC≈9,900 views116 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Как вам идея?

  1. Отличная, давайте вайп раз в месяц 😍43%
  2. Хочу вайп раз в 2 месяца 🤬57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤50🤬40🗿15🤔9💋2

12 Oct 2026, 21:40 UTC≈10,600 views91 reactionsread 6 November 2026

После рестарта выйдет ещё несколько фиксов. Самый важный касается регистрации урона. После перехода на новую версию кастомный чар «Поглощение» стал работать неправильно: он полностью отменял удар. С завтрашнего дня чар работает по-другому. Удар больше не отменяется, вместо этого урон снижается на 25%. Шанс срабатывания 3%, перезарядка 5 секунд. Если чар стоит на всех 4 вещах, шанс выше. Так же скорее всего получило…

❤68🤬11❤‍🔥5💘5🍓2

10 Oct 2026, 21:57 UTC≈9,630 views78 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Сейчас фиксим всё, что нашли после вайпа: из основного, так это лаги у некоторых игроков, которые начинались спустя минут 10-20 игры на сервере, при котором спасал только перезаход. После фиксов дальше продолжим заниматься следующей обновой. Из интересного уже могу немного заспойлерить (всё перечисленное ниже уже готово): • Апгрейдер • Система, которую вы так долго просили переработать и которая затронет почти все …

❤64🤩6🤣4👏2💘2

10 Oct 2026, 14:55 UTC≈5,880 views85 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Успешно провели вайп, через 5 минут уже будет дракончик. Больше информации напишу уже под ночь, всем удачного вайпа ❤️

❤63🤬12🥰7🍓2😘1

9 Sept 2026, 20:56 UTC≈11,500 views313 reactionsread 6 November 2026

В следующем вайпе будет красивый апгрейд в казике 🤤

❤203👍44💔34💘20✍12

22 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC≈17,100 views62 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Может, полностью переписать пвп режим, убрать баги и сделать этот режим удобнее?

  1. Давай 🤯79%
  2. Лучше чем-то другим заняться 🧐21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤46👏6💘4❤‍🔥3🔥3

15 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈18,500 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Исправили известные баги, починили вход с всех регионов, чуть залил фиксов ач, исправили ложные кики с новой версии, но советую играть с более старых версий, это касается не только нашего сервера (разработчикам игры спасибо) 🧐 Креаторки и сф за баги выдадим скорее всего вечером, когда закончим всё что осталось 🤯

❤43🤬14👏5🍌2👍2

14 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈15,600 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Что начать делать в ближайшие дни?

  1. Усиленно заняться ач (фиксануть проблемы, добавить еще пару детектов и тд)44%
  2. Заняться усиленно обновлением (Сделаю следующий вайп прям масштабным)65%
  3. Предложу свой вариант в комментах6%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤28🔥2🦄2🤬1

14 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈13,200 views38 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Вайп успешно прошёл. Записал для себя моменты где можно еще увеличить производительность и улучшить пару моментов во время вайпа. Так же хочу напомнить что в этом вайпе не сбрасывались скиллы 🤯

❤31👍4🥰2💋1

14 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈15,200 views135 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Как просили сделали питомца "Тун Тун Тун Сахура" 🤯 Было 249 галочек в дс под этой идеей

❤84🙉23🥰10👏9😁9

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @hon9xx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Oct 2026, 11:19 UTCAnonymous Poll2,530 voters approx.

Как вам идея?

  1. Отличная, давайте вайп раз в месяц 😍43%
  2. Хочу вайп раз в 2 месяца 🤬57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTCAnonymous Poll2,340 voters approx.

Может, полностью переписать пвп режим, убрать баги и сделать этот режим удобнее?

  1. Давай 🤯79%
  2. Лучше чем-то другим заняться 🧐21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTCAnonymous Poll1,710 voters approx.

Что начать делать в ближайшие дни?

  1. Усиленно заняться ач (фиксануть проблемы, добавить еще пару детектов и тд)44%
  2. Заняться усиленно обновлением (Сделаю следующий вайп прям масштабным)65%
  3. Предложу свой вариант в комментах6%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTCAnonymous Poll2,530 voters approx.

Как вы относитесь к минусовой высоте в обычном мире? 🤯

  1. Добавляем 😛71%
  2. Оставляем как есть (без минусовой высоты) 😕29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTCAnonymous Poll2,530 voters approx.

Закрываем пару анок в следующем вайпе?

  1. Закрываем 🤬61%
  2. Закрываем только часть, своё мнение отпишу в комментариях 😕39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2026, 09:23 UTCAnonymous Poll2,680 voters approx.

Делаем тест сервер в следующем вайпе?

  1. Делаем 🖤74%
  2. Нет, будет не так интересно 😢26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 1 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Домик Хоникса 🖤” (@hon9xx), 6,541 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hon9xx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.