Channel
@homohomini
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,579subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001537583936 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @homohomini |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/homohomini |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 4,579 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 4,592 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 4,588 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 4,588 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (27 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,739 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
21 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 47.6% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Федерации бокса Российской Федерации знают о «подвигах» братьев: там должны принять решение по факту соответствия работы в должности тренера их отца Отец этих «боксеров» является преподавателем «Спортивной школы олимпийского резерва» по боксу. Его сыновья занимаются в Школе, где преподает их отец бокс, и это Исмаилов ДмитрийЭдуардович и Исмаилов Андрей Эдуардович. А теперь вопрос: «Имеет ли моральное право …
Photo, posted without a caption
Для сведения журналистам которые сегодня защищают сексуальных извращенцев : «22 января 2026 года девочка была осмотрена комиссионно:-профессором кафедры «Психиатрии , наркологии и клинической психологии СГМУ им.В.И. Разумовского», заведующим отделением ментальных расстройств УКБ № 4, доцентом кафедры «Проледевтики детских болезней , детской эндокринологии и диабетологии СГМУ им.Разумовского, врачом –неврологом и вра…
При этом, разве «СарИнформ» не уподобился«сливному бачку», не проверив информацию всесторонне? Можно ли доверять такому СМИ? В конце статьи немного хотели бы напомнить читателям о том, что такое «СарИнформ», и почему ему по нашему мнению не следует доверять. Вот как об этом сообщало одно из СМИ Саратова: «За последние пару лет депутат Саратовской облдумы от "Единой России" Андрей Воробьев вступил не только в…
Photo, posted without a caption
Например, журналистам «СарИнформа» можно ознакомится со статьей на сайте «Саратовского репортера» опубликованной на днях «Саратовский правовой беспредел» https://rsar.ru/index.php/home/823-saratovskij-pravovoj-bespredel, или со статьей опубликованной 26 февраля этого года : « В город Маркс вернулся 1937 год». https://rsar.ru/index.php/home/774-v-gorod-marks-vernulsya-1937-god В этих и других статьях журналисты «С…
Photo, posted without a caption
Злоупотребляя, полагаем, своим правом и нарушая Закон «О СМИ» ИА «Саринформ» при этом не называет фамилии главных фигурантов: тех, кого, якобы избили Почему же так избирательно журналисты поступают? Фамилии тех, кто якобы бил назвали, а тех, кого якобы избили- нет. Отчего же так? Был заказ назвать одни фамилии, а другие не называть? Знает ли журналист, что девочка 10 лет ( а не 11 лет как он написал), к…
ИА "СарИнформ" встал на защиту сексуальных извращенцев? «В Саратовской области завершили расследование дела об избиении подростков» - сообщило ИА «СарИнформ» и далее это ИА сообщает: «На днях расследование завершилось. Дело ушло в марксовскую прокуратуру. Если та одобрит обвинение, мужчины предстанут перед судом». Странно, не правда ли: рядовое дело с какими-то подростками, которых якобы избили какие-то мужчины. П…
Photo, posted without a caption
Пока подчиненные Костина и сам Костин следят за честью своего мундира и упрямо бездействуют, здоровье несовершеннолетней девочки существенно ухудшилось Недавно, по настоянию её родителей первым СО первого отдела по РОВД СУ СК РФ по Саратовской области была проведена судебно-медицинская экспертиза. По результатам экспертизы было получено заключение эксперта №90 от 02.07.2026 и это заключение малоутешительно. С…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @homohomini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 758,720 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НА САМОМ ДЕЛЕ” (@homohomini), 4,579 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/homohomini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.