Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Homiak Торгує

Channel

Homiak Торгує

@homiak_trade

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

39,484subscribers

-380 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002233072748
TypeChannel
Username@homiak_trade
DescriptionТрушний трейдер, інколи хомяк 🐹📈 Торгую на OKX: https://www.okx.com/join/HOMIAKTRADER Звязок: @Homiak_Manager
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/homiak_trade

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

39,48440,09239,7887 August 2026 — 39,864 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,851 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,853 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,850 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,851 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,963 subscribers13 August 2026 — 39,997 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40,042 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,011 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,043 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,070 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,092 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,058 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,080 subscribers22 August 2026 — 40,049 subscribers24 August 2026 — 39,955 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,933 subscribers26 August 2026 — 39,915 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,904 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,883 subscribers29 August 2026 — 39,856 subscribers30 August 2026 — 39,825 subscribers31 August 2026 — 39,801 subscribers1 September 2026 — 39,768 subscribers2 September 2026 — 39,737 subscribers3 September 2026 — 39,675 subscribers5 September 2026 — 39,632 subscribers8 September 2026 — 39,571 subscribers11 September 2026 — 39,623 subscribers13 September 2026 — 39,607 subscribers14 September 2026 — 39,632 subscribers16 September 2026 — 39,622 subscribers19 September 2026 — 39,484 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -380. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,393–40,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:3739,484-138
16 Sept 2026, 20:1739,622-10
14 Sept 2026, 19:5639,632+25
13 Sept 2026, 08:5939,607-16
11 Sept 2026, 10:1939,623+52
8 Sept 2026, 18:0039,571-61
5 Sept 2026, 10:3939,632-43
3 Sept 2026, 10:0539,675-62
2 Sept 2026, 07:4239,737-31
1 Sept 2026, 08:1839,768-33
31 Aug 2026, 07:1639,801-24
30 Aug 2026, 09:5439,825-31
29 Aug 2026, 13:0739,856-27
28 Aug 2026, 12:4639,883-21
27 Aug 2026, 10:5539,904-11
26 Aug 2026, 11:4339,915-18
25 Aug 2026, 11:3439,933-22
24 Aug 2026, 14:1439,955-94
22 Aug 2026, 22:0840,049-31
21 Aug 2026, 12:0440,080first reading

Engagement

161 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 39,484 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,750
98 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 161 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held161 (31 July 202623 September 2026)
Views total661,050
Reactions total7,717
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 11:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,910
Videos
120
Links
155

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 39s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,588 reactions across 161 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,30953.8%
🔥4,09930.2%
🐳1,2279.03%
🫡9537.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 161 of the 161 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,588 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 161 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 10:38 UTC≈2,600 views38 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Avax ще себе покаже, що думаєте? Знаю, що фактично він -95% від АТН зараз, але йому зробити х2 від ціни значно легше ніж тому самому хайпу, який вже і так перегрітий Плюс в цьому році в штатах його офіційно визнали товаром разом з пачкою інших активів, тому при регуляції він як мінімум в білому списку

23🔥9🐳5🫡1

23 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC≈4,940 views262 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

чел собі пам'ятку зробив шоб не лудити😁

154🫡73🔥21🐳14

22 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTC≈6,180 views56 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

$xrp пост раз 👉 жми пост два, нещодавно 👉 ще раз жми і це тільки початок

30🔥15🐳11

22 Sept 2026, 11:59 UTC≈6,280 views117 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Для експертів в коментарях почну з того, чому це не низькосортна інфа: Місячний таймфрейм - єдиний, де не сховатись. На 15 хвилинах можна намалювати що завгодно, на місяці свічку рухає тільки реальний капітал Хто закрив місяць і де - той і сильніший. Все інше пиль мальчіки! Тепер по картинці, нумерацію накинув щоб не загубились 1 → АТН 2018, 19 800$. Максимум попереднього циклу 2 → 2022 рік, ведмежий ринок. Ціна

60🔥47🐳10

22 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTC≈6,270 views286 reactionsread 23 September 2026

я завалив *б*ло як побачив накинути вам мега сильний фактор бички по технічній чістині графіку бітка, від якого немає шансів сходити у відкат??

182🔥77🐳17🫡10

22 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC≈6,920 views108 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

$ZEC Спот +212% Взимку топив за нього і тоді мені писали що я лох і купую зек по 475$, бо типу він до того пару місяців тому коштував менше 100 баксів😂 Але вже він майже 1590 баксів, фактично як ефір 3 місяці тому

68🔥31🐳9

22 Sept 2026, 06:42 UTC≈6,710 views54 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

30🔥18🐳6

21 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC≈7,720 views88 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

❗️актуально сьогодні

64🔥19🐳5

21 Sept 2026, 13:21 UTC≈8,090 views71 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

$NEAR Спот +171%🔥 від найнижчої точки яку вам давав Цей брав нормальним об'ємом, бо був впевнений в ньому Тому і шилив його останні місяці всім підряд - в комюніті за літо купу разів давав входи нижче 2 баксів, а зараз він вже 4,45$ Свій закрив в +55% бо сам зайшов вище і не всі ліміти дочекався, тому в мене скромніше. Але з нормальним об'ємом і таким очевидним контекстом - ван лав

🔥4021🐳10

21 Sept 2026, 09:51 UTC≈7,360 views101 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Прикалують навіть не тіпи а спільноти які кидають одну і ту саму пнл вже 10 раз підряд або сетап бо там % на пару пунктів пригнув Типу яку вони класну позу набрали колись а по факту вже тримають там 3 копійки, і чисто людям фомо розганяють😂

56🔥31🐳14

21 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC≈7,430 views113 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Купив біток по 75к$, вже можна продавати чи ще тримати що скажете? Бичка гайз ?

68🔥33🐳12

21 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC≈7,820 views57 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

$PUMP Спот +12% Рівно рік тому набирали, більшу частину року ця позиція висіла в мінусі Вийшов в невеликий плюс, не жирно, але це спот - без плеча, без ліквідації, без стопа а тому і дав час пересидіти Мінус пересидів, плюс забрав, моя історія поки з цією монетою закрита В нього є гарні шанси піти ще вище, так як повернулись в сильний діапазон, тому в кого є бажання і сили можете потримати

35🔥13🐳9

Showing the 12 most recent of 161 posts we hold for @homiak_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Homiak Торгує” (@homiak_trade), 39,484 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/homiak_trade.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.