WS全参混合劫持 低价出售24H可提号 没有限制出货时间

Channel
菲菲的秘密基地
@homgtuchuhaiws
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
140subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003760001363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @homgtuchuhaiws |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/homgtuchuhaiws |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 22:17 | 140 | +5 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 135 | +7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 128 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:23 | 129 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 129 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.2%
- avg views ÷ 140 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15.7
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 47 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
美国超链专用号 效果直接拉满 需要的滴滴
Photo, posted without a caption
Ws各国协议号: 巴西,美国,英国,德国,法国,西班牙,印度,土耳其,墨西哥,罗马尼亚,印尼,加纳,喀麦隆,孟加拉,尼日利亚 混合个人协议,混合商业等各国打粉语音协议号 欢迎咨询:@guagua68888
📱劫持全参 万量供应 可指定号段 群发 打粉 超链 拉群 效果奈斯 美国协议全参打本土图文超链 效果拉满 咨询热线:@feifei68889
美国🇺🇸全叁劫持 大量现货 欢迎来聊
墨西哥 印尼 印度 哥伦比亚 智利 危地马拉 全参劫持 现货直出 美国超链号 质量梆梆硬 欢迎咨询:@feifei68889
美国超链号 现货直出 超链效果很哇塞 需要的速度联系 @feifei68889
美国超链号 现货直出 需要的速度联系,先到先得
全参劫持库存满满 现货国家100多个 热门国家都有 需要的欢迎来咨询 联系方式:@feifei68889
意大利 英国 西班牙全参劫持现货,需要的联系
提供ws美国图文超链本国号发送
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @homgtuchuhaiws. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲菲的秘密基地” (@homgtuchuhaiws), 140 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/homgtuchuhaiws.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.