Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SOLO PARA HOMBRES

Channel

SOLO PARA HOMBRES

@hombrestg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

5,077subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001471943312
TypeChannel
Username@hombrestg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hombrestg

Growth

5,0775,0925,084.56 August 2026 — 5,092 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,092 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,086 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,089 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,077 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,075–5,094 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:165,077-12
10 Aug 2026, 04:345,089+3
7 Aug 2026, 04:005,086-6
6 Aug 2026, 08:455,092no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:385,092first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25m 45s
Average length
3m 13s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

272 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14754.0%
👍2910.7%
👌196.99%
👏176.25%
🔥155.51%
😁103.68%
🥰82.94%
🤩72.57%
🥴41.47%
🏆31.10%
🤣31.10%
👎20.735%
💯20.735%
🤔20.735%
🎃10.368%
😐10.368%
😢10.368%
😱10.368%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2025 to 17 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Nov 2025, 15:06 UTC≈47,900 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

- ➡️ t.me/+WhmxOYItqWpkMzAx ➡️ t.me/+WhmxOYItqWpkMzAx ➡️ t.me/+WhmxOYItqWpkMzAx -

35🔥12😁5👏4🤔2

12 Nov 2025, 10:06 UTC≈46,500 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

- SOLO PARA HOMBRES | @mostrame ⚡️ SIGUIENTE VÍDEO >>

22👌6😁1

6 Nov 2025, 15:22 UTC≈44,600 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Un truco real para deshacerse de la mayoría de los problemas. SOLO PARA HOMBRES | @mostrame ⚡️ SIGUIENTE VÍDEO >>

28🥴4😁2

26 Oct 2025, 15:43 UTC≈43,400 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

SOLO PARA HOMBRES | @mostrame ⚡️ SIGUIENTE VÍDEO >>

9👏7🤣3👍1🤩1😁1

20 Oct 2025, 16:52 UTC≈35,400 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

SOLO PARA HOMBRES | @mostrame

👍8👏42🤩2🎃1👎1😁1

17 Oct 2025, 12:14 UTC≈29,300 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

5 TIPOS DE PERSONAS QUE DESTRUYEN TU PAZ ¿Has notado que algunas personas simplemente destruyen tu paz? En este video te muestro los 5 tipos de personas que drenan tu energía y roban tu tranquilidad sin que te des cuenta. Reconocerlos es el primer paso para protegerte y recuperar tu paz interior. SOLO PARA HOMBRES | @mostrame

5👌5🏆1👍1

16 Oct 2025, 14:00 UTC≈23,800 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TE LO DEBES A TI MISMO (2025) – Discurso Motivacional de Matthew McConaughey McConaughey es conocido en todo el mundo por sus numerosos logros: ganador del Óscar al mejor actor por Dallas Buyers Club, un Globo de Oro, un premio del Sindicato de Guionistas y Actores, dos premios Critics' Choice, un premio People's Choice y muchos más. SOLO PARA HOMBRES | @mostrame

👌85👍2

14 Aug 2025, 14:45 UTC≈28,300 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

¡Dale un toque fresco a tu look con estas zapatillas Stan Smith! 👟 Su diseño clásico y minimalista te ofrece versatilidad y estilo para cualquier ocasión. Perfectas para un outfit casual o para darle un toque relajado a un look más formal. ¡No te quedes sin ellas! 😉 Combínalas con tus jeans, pantalones chinos o incluso con un traje para un estilo moderno y desenfadado. Su comodidad te permitirá llevarlas todo el día

11👍3👏2👎1

13 Aug 2025, 14:45 UTC≈20,900 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

¡Eleva tu estilo con estas botas de cuero negro! 👞 Su diseño clásico y robusto te dará un toque de elegancia y confianza en cada paso. Ideales para el día a día o para una ocasión especial. ¡No te quedes sin ellas! 😉 Combínalas con tus jeans o pantalones favoritos para un look impecable. Su comodidad te permitirá llevarlas durante horas sin sacrificar el estilo. ¡Un básico imprescindible en tu armario! 😎 SOLO PARA

👍3🤩32

12 Aug 2025, 23:45 UTC≈17,400 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SOLO PARA HOMBRES | TELEGRAM BOSS

🥰42👍2🤩1😐1😢1

12 Aug 2025, 20:46 UTC≈16,200 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

☀️ Prepárate para el verano 2025 con este top cómodo informal deportivo para hombre. Esta camisa POLO de manga corta destaca por sus modernos retazos de color sólido y prácticos bolsillos falsos que añaden estilo sin perder funcionalidad. 🏃‍♂️ Ideal para actividades al aire libre o un look casual, su diseño ligero y fresco te mantiene cómodo durante todo el día, combinando moda y confort para la temporada más cálida

4💯2

12 Aug 2025, 14:45 UTC≈16,800 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

¡Elegancia nupcial con estilo! 🤵‍♂️ Un traje gris de tres piezas con camisa celeste y corbata a juego es una opción sofisticada y moderna. Los mocasines de cuero completan el look con un toque de distinción. 👌 Añade un pañuelo de bolsillo a juego y un reloj elegante para los detalles finales. ¡Un atuendo perfecto para el novio que busca destacar con confianza en su gran día! 💯 SOLO PARA HOMBRES | TELEGRAM BOSS

🏆2👍1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @hombrestg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 36,361 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SOLO PARA HOMBRES” (@hombrestg), 5,077 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hombrestg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.