добавлять бел рубли в цену?
- да56%
- нет47%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Channel
@holyblondes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10,846subscribers
+2,237 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002442812471 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @holyblondes |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/holyblondes |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 10,846 | -201 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 11,047 | +244 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 10,803 | +291 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 10,512 | +213 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 10,299 | +1,010 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 9,289 | +747 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 8,542 | -44 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 8,586 | -26 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 8,612 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 8,609 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 8,609 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (19 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,676 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
88 reactions across 21 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 55 | 62.5% | |
| 💘 | 33 | 37.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
добавлять бел рубли в цену?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
beautiful purple checkered bomber -good -size M women's красивенький бомбер фиолетового цвета в интересную клетку. тканевый материал, прекрасная кроп посадка, металлическая фурнитура, приятные упругие манжеты длина 56 ширина 49 2777₽ @leonpivo⭐ #холиналичие
🍓1💘1
guess icon black t-shirt -size XS -great легендарная футболка гесс с большим логотипом и надписью icon из кристаллов. насыщенный чёрный цвет длина 57 ширина 40 1600₽ 1200₽ @leonpivo⭐ #холиналичие
abercrombie & fitch navy hoodie -good классный винтажный худи от аберкомби. все логотипы вышиты, мягкий приятный хлопок, ребристые манжеты длина 63 ширина 51 1800₽ 1200₽ @leonpivo⭐ #холиналичие
🍓1
ralph lauren raspberry longsleeve кто-то забрал быстрее тебя включи уведомления! ⭐
🍓1💘1
gap pink hoodie кто-то забрал быстрее тебя включи уведомления! ⭐
miss no no gg&l black bag -size 36×29 -great чёрная сумка ggl. качественный материал, множество карманов, фирменный карабин 7000₽ 6555₽ лоубол @leonpivo⭐ #холиналичие
🍓1💘1
victoria's secret black polka dot wide pants -great красивые штаны от виктории сикрет. широкий фит, качественный материал, лампасы по бокам и принт в горошек по всем штанам длина 105 пп регулируется выход 28 1700₽ 1111₽ @leonpivo⭐ #холиналичие
🍓1💘1
ltb asymmetrical zip archive denim jacket -excellent архивная джинсовка от лтб. множество различных декоративных деталей и супер интересный кроп фит с удлиненными рукавами. асимметричный зип дополняет джинсовку. помимо этого имеет очень классный градиент серого длина 56 ширина 47 2700₽ 2100₽ @leonpivo⭐ #холиналичие
💘1
abercrombie & fitch cropped leather jacket -size L -excellent (ideal) классическая косуха с интересными деталями от известного бренда. классический фасон, интересная фактура, множество зипов и металлической фирменной фурнитуры. идеальный джекет на осень длина 55 ширина 47 4400₽ @leonpivo⭐ #холиналичие
🍓1💘1
tommy hilfiger vintage lightweight striped longsleeve sweater -great достаточно интересная вещь от томми. винтажный легкий полосатый свитер с длинными рукавами с необычным колорвеем, потайными мини-карманами на рукавах с пуговицами. очень приятный на ощупь материал, открытое горло длина 57 ширина 43 1555₽ @leonpivo⭐ #холиналичие
🍓1💘1
combined vintage hussar khaki jacket -great весьма интересный гусарский джекет. состоит из наружного плотного хлопка и имитации клетчатой рубашки внутри. вся фурнитура металлическая, идеальная посадка с удлиненными рукавами. отлично подойдёт на осень длина 56 ширина 43 2500₽ @leonpivo⭐ #холиналичие
🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @holyblondes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@holyblondes edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
добавлять бел рубли в цену?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“холи блондес” (@holyblondes), 10,846 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/holyblondes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.