Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

—𝙃𝙊𝙁𝙁𝙈𝘼𝙉𝙉

@hoffmannray

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

180subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001746323974
TypeChannel
Username@hoffmannray
Description⇉ [‹‹ ››]❝ᴀдʍиниᴄᴛᴩᴀция❞ ⇉[‹‹ ››] ❍ ───────────────╮ . . . Evᴇryᴛiʍᴇ I ᴄlᴏsᴇ ʍy ᴇyᴇs Iᴛ's liᴋᴇ ᴀ dᴀrᴋ ᴩᴀrᴀdisᴇ. │─► @Angello4zek ʙᴧᴀдᴇᴧᴇц. │─► @ ᴏᴛʙᴇчᴀᴇᴛ ɜᴀ ᴄᴏюɜы. │─► @ ᴏᴛʙᴇчᴀᴇᴛ ɜᴀ ᴨᴏᴄᴛы. │─► @ᴏᴛʙᴇчᴀᴇᴛ ɜᴀ ᴨᴏᴄᴛы.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hoffmannray

Growth

18010 Aug 2026, 20:47 — 180 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 21:00 — 180 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:4710 Aug 2026, 21:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 179–181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:00180no change
10 Aug 2026, 20:47180first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 3 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
51
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 51s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

299 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53843927299522718249130.4%
custom 54565062573492959468929.8%
custom 52063100499866590347926.4%
custom 53660559640824505793511.7%
custom 528746048063224717231.00%
custom 535733144669023145510.334%
custom 536637773873730613810.334%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2025 to 9 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 15 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hoffmannray. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 September 2025 to 9 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Feb 2026, 16:52 UTC806 views38 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

💷 монтажёр: @Darkrozez Hoffmann представляет..

custom 538439272995227182411custom 545650625734929594611custom 52063100499866590347custom 53660559640824505797custom 52874604806322471721custom 53573314466902314551

Signed delusion of happiness.

3 Jan 2026, 12:48 UTC≈1,240 views23 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛

custom 54565062573492959468custom 53843927299522718246custom 53660559640824505794custom 52063100499866590342custom 52874604806322471722custom 53663777387373061381

Signed ᅠH̬͔̘̮̅̏͂a̩̲͙̜̱͂̀ͅy̱̜͚̦̭͇̫ͭl̩̞̱̬̲ͮͦ̂ͭö̩̩͚ͫͨ͗͑ͬ̏fͦ̅̃͐ͫͪᅠᅠᅠ

24 Nov 2025, 21:06 UTC≈1,410 views10 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

они у нас просто секс.🔇

custom 52063100499866590349custom 53843927299522718241

Signed ᅠH̬͔̘̮̅̏͂a̩̲͙̜̱͂̀ͅy̱̜͚̦̭͇̫ͭl̩̞̱̬̲ͮͦ̂ͭö̩̩͚ͫͨ͗͑ͬ̏fͦ̅̃͐ͫͪᅠᅠᅠ

10 Nov 2025, 17:26 UTC≈1,380 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 53843927299522718246custom 54565062573492959464custom 52063100499866590343custom 53660559640824505791

Signed ᅠH̬͔̘̮̅̏͂a̩̲͙̜̱͂̀ͅy̱̜͚̦̭͇̫ͭl̩̞̱̬̲ͮͦ̂ͭö̩̩͚ͫͨ͗͑ͬ̏fͦ̅̃͐ͫͪᅠᅠᅠ

8 Nov 2025, 09:35 UTC836 views13 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Video

🫵🫵🫵

custom 54565062573492959466custom 53843927299522718244custom 52063100499866590343

Signed ᅠᅠᅠ

29 Oct 2025, 20:59 UTC874 views18 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

луна сегодня предупреждает о прекрасном дне, улыбнитесь и шагните в этот день с энергией!

custom 54565062573492959468custom 53843927299522718246custom 52063100499866590344

Signed H̬͔̘̮̅̏͂a̩̲͙̜̱͂̀ͅy̱̜͚̦̭͇̫ͭl̩̞̱̬̲ͮͦ̂ͭö̩̩͚ͫͨ͗͑ͬ̏fͦ̅̃͐ͫͪ

29 Oct 2025, 20:52 UTC838 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩

custom 53843927299522718247custom 52063100499866590345custom 54565062573492959464

Signed H̬͔̘̮̅̏͂a̩̲͙̜̱͂̀ͅy̱̜͚̦̭͇̫ͭl̩̞̱̬̲ͮͦ̂ͭö̩̩͚ͫͨ͗͑ͬ̏fͦ̅̃͐ͫͪ

24 Oct 2025, 13:58 UTC815 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🦴🦴🦴

custom 538439272995227182410custom 52063100499866590346custom 54565062573492959466

Signed H̬͔̘̮̅̏͂a̩̲͙̜̱͂̀ͅy̱̜͚̦̭͇̫ͭl̩̞̱̬̲ͮͦ̂ͭö̩̩͚ͫͨ͗͑ͬ̏fͦ̅̃͐ͫͪ

13 Oct 2025, 09:02 UTC883 views12 reactions13 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

😔😔😔

custom 53843927299522718245custom 54565062573492959464custom 52063100499866590343

Signed H̬͔̘̮̅̏͂a̩̲͙̜̱͂̀ͅy̱̜͚̦̭͇̫ͭl̩̞̱̬̲ͮͦ̂ͭö̩̩͚ͫͨ͗͑ͬ̏fͦ̅̃͐ͫͪ

3 Oct 2025, 13:16 UTC≈1,110 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

custom 538439272995227182410custom 52063100499866590348custom 54565062573492959468

Signed ᅠᅠH̬͔̘̮̅̏͂a̩̲͙̜̱͂̀ͅy̱̜͚̦̭͇̫ͭl̩̞̱̬̲ͮͦ̂ͭö̩̩͚ͫͨ͗͑ͬ̏fͦ̅̃͐ͫͪ ̺͌̐ͦ

23 Sept 2025, 10:41 UTC≈1,130 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54565062573492959467custom 52063100499866590345custom 53843927299522718245

Signed ᅠᅠH̬͔̘̮̅̏͂a̩̲͙̜̱͂̀ͅy̱̜͚̦̭͇̫ͭl̩̞̱̬̲ͮͦ̂ͭö̩̩͚ͫͨ͗͑ͬ̏fͦ̅̃͐ͫͪ ̺͌̐ͦ

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @hoffmannray. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 938,539 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“—𝙃𝙊𝙁𝙁𝙈𝘼𝙉𝙉” (@hoffmannray), 180 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hoffmannray.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.