Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 43 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,183–3,321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 16:37
3,199
-13
15 Sept 2026, 13:58
3,212
-2
14 Sept 2026, 03:01
3,214
-6
11 Sept 2026, 20:57
3,220
-2
10 Sept 2026, 05:58
3,222
-4
7 Sept 2026, 14:39
3,226
-6
4 Sept 2026, 22:21
3,232
-1
2 Sept 2026, 23:57
3,233
-7
31 Aug 2026, 22:05
3,240
-2
31 Aug 2026, 02:14
3,242
-5
28 Aug 2026, 22:07
3,247
-2
28 Aug 2026, 02:56
3,249
-5
25 Aug 2026, 22:09
3,254
-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:16
3,256
-8
22 Aug 2026, 22:15
3,264
no change
22 Aug 2026, 03:44
3,264
-6
19 Aug 2026, 14:25
3,270
-4
18 Aug 2026, 14:05
3,274
-2
16 Aug 2026, 21:55
3,276
-2
15 Aug 2026, 15:46
3,278
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 20s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
299 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
82
27.4%
❤
80
26.8%
👍
40
13.4%
😢
30
10.0%
☃
25
8.36%
😁
13
4.35%
🤣
12
4.01%
custom 5395803564704542222
10
3.34%
custom 5201765394766919221
2
0.669%
custom 5296708666207011819
2
0.669%
👎
2
0.669%
😨
1
0.334%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Уважаемые подписчики!
Будем с вами честны — сейчас для Хоккейного Хаба непростое время.
С одной стороны — телеграм: с текущими блокировками и ограничениями мессенджера становится все сложнее и сложнее оперативно выкладывать фото-, и тем более, видеоматериалы, обрабатывать контент с арен. Также прогрессирует общая тенденция отказа аудитории от Телеграм, а это — глобально влияет на падение охватов и уменьшения подпис…
🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
🏒 обзор тура /время мск/
"Адмирал" - "Нефтехимик" 7:3
СТАТИСТИКА
Броски в створ: 36-29
Вбрасывания: 35-37
Блок: 10-23
Силовые приёмы: 8-16
Штраф: 8-12
Это был, пожалуй, лучший матч "Адмирала" в этом сезоне. Причëм "моряки" играли первым номером, сами вели игру. Уже после 40 минут счёт на табло был 4:1. "Нефтехимик" проиграл червëртый матч подряд. Для нижнекамцев это уже восьмое поражение в последних десяти иг…
🏒 Лучшим игроком дня, по версии хоккейного ХАБа, стал нападающий "Адмирала" Егор Чезганов⚓️
Форвард впервые в этом сезоне набрал 4 очка. Егор перебрался во Владивосток из китайской команды в дедлайн. Всего же за "Адмирал" Чезганов успел сыграть 13 матчей и набрал 7 (2+5) очков. И 4 из них - сегодня.
Подпишись на Хоккейный Хаб 🏒
🌏❄️«Сибирь» одержала победу в Шанхае и увеличила отрыв от «Амура» до пяти очков.
В середине третьего периода победную шайбу забросил нападающий Вячеслав Лещенко 🔥
Подпишись на Хоккейный Хаб 🏒
⚓️ Разгром во Владивостоке! Если бы "Адмирал" так играл сразу после назначения Олега Браташа, то "моряки" могли бы сейчас побиться за восьмое место..
Подпишись на Хоккейный Хаб 🏒
Что творится сегодня во Владивостоке! Может день зарплаты в "Адмирале"?
⚓️ 6:1 🐺 - после 40 минут матча! "Моряки" просто уничтожают соперника. "Нефтехимик" не спасла и замена вратаря.
🐺Филипп Долганов - 4 гола
🐺Ярослав Озолин - 2 гола
А пока можно насладиться дублем капитана "Адмирала" Степана Старкова!
Подпишись на Хоккейный Хаб 🏒
❤7🔥4👍1😨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hockey_hub_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хоккейный Хаб” (@hockey_hub_channel), 3,199 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hockey_hub_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.