Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хоккейная Империя

Channel

Хоккейная Империя

@hockey_empire

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,245subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001362028532
TypeChannel
Username@hockey_empire
Created6 March 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hockey_empire

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,1779,3359,2566 August 2026 — 9,270 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,270 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,275 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,177 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,193 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,232 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,255 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,294 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,313 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,335 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,224 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,243 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,197 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,221 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,245 subscribers9,2456 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,153–9,359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:419,245+24
14 Sept 2026, 08:179,221+24
10 Sept 2026, 13:379,197-46
5 Sept 2026, 00:189,243+19
1 Sept 2026, 08:459,224-111
29 Aug 2026, 06:049,335+22
26 Aug 2026, 16:179,313+19
23 Aug 2026, 05:369,294+39
19 Aug 2026, 16:349,255+23
16 Aug 2026, 18:239,232+39
13 Aug 2026, 01:349,193+16
9 Aug 2026, 15:179,177-98
6 Aug 2026, 19:489,275+5
6 Aug 2026, 10:179,270no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:589,270first reading

Engagement

160 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.41%
avg views ÷ 9,245 subscribers
Avg views / post
592
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 160 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held160 (4 August 202627 August 2026)
Views total4,739
Reactions total96
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 04s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,466 reactions across 131 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥67827.5%
43617.7%
👍41416.8%
😁1797.26%
custom 53888025017240921551767.14%
👎1395.64%
🤣1154.66%
👏763.08%
🎉572.31%
🕊441.78%
331.34%
🙏210.852%
🥰200.811%
💯190.77%
💔140.568%
🫡90.365%
🤔60.243%
🤝60.243%
👌50.203%
😱40.162%
5 further kinds150.608%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 133 of the 160 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,466 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 160 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hockey_empire. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 160 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC627 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ты становишься на углу оживленной улицы и представляешь, что тебя здесь нет. Вернее, тебя нет вообще. Пешеходы идут, сигналят машины, открываются двери магазинов, сменяются пассажиры на остановке. То есть в принципе мир продолжает жить и без тебя. Понимать это больно, но важно. (с) Сергей Бодров

12🤔5custom 53888025017240921554

27 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC588 viewsread 29 August 2026

Если что: не сокрушаюсь, интересная мысль просто

27 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC560 viewsread 29 August 2026

Пара десятков, может сотен человек, недельку погрустят, затем перейдут — на другие площадки Сансара

27 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC566 viewsread 29 August 2026

Слишком много нынче альтернатив развелось Газет Сайтов Авторов Каналов Блогеров Хоккеистов Журналистов Федераций Клубов Лиг

27 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC528 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Знаете, что понял за две недели Если Империя закроется - никто ничего не лишится

custom 53888025017240921554😱2

27 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC591 views50 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Кузя в Сибири — это… 👍 - Надолго 👎 - Ненадолго ❤️ - По любви!

👎3710👍3

27 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC671 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Блудный сын продолжает путь

😁106🔥3

22 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,490 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

#Был_такой_хоккей 2009 год Малкин символически забил и познакомил Магнитогорск с Кубком Стэнли 🏆 После чемпионского сезона 2008/2009 в составе пингвинов, россиянин привез завоеванный трофей на родину и порадовал земляков прямо на матче родной Магнитки. Женя вышел в составе команды, забил гол и поехал на скамейку штрафников за трофеем. Это был первый раз, когда Кубок Стэнли побывал в Магнитогорске. Такое событие

🔥20👏4🤝1

22 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,270 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#Империя_добавляет Во время карьеры игрока Андрей Назаров выполнял роль полицейского, он защищал своих партнеров от нападок и угроз со стороны соперников. В игровом плане россиянин не выделялся, но характера у него было не занимать. На тренерском мостике Назаров остался верен своим принципам и данную речь тренер произнес своей команде, для того чтобы зарядить подопечных на бой.

👍4

22 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,190 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#Цитата «Пацаны, нет мастерства, надо брать чем-то другим, надо брать характером на**й, яйцами б**ть!» «Ну невозможно, так и будете в этих чебуречных, жрать чебуреки и все, на этом кончается карьера и дальше нет ничего» «Пока вот здесь не появится, биться на**й, биться! По**й как ты катаешься, надо биться, цепляться б**ть, каждую смену!» (с) Андрей Назаров

6😁4🔥3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 160 posts we hold for @hockey_empire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hockey_empire edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTCAnonymous Poll65 voters

Какой вариант победит в голосовании❓

  1. 15%
  2. 25%
  3. 331%
  4. 45%
  5. 525%
  6. 615%
  7. 711%
  8. 85%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Роганов Хоккей
@roganov_hockey · 68,622
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Roman Rotenberg 🇷🇺
@rotenberg81 · 158,105
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 12 August 2026
Только Хоккей l Трансферы КХЛ
@Only_Hockey1 · 24,525
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026
Хоккейный клуб СКА
@hcska · 51,141
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 25 August 2026
Atributika&Club
@atributikaclub · 26,151
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
Хоккей России
@rusicehockey · 27,562
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
KХЛ & NHL
@khlnhlsports · 45,838
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Хоккей и LYSENKOV TV / НХЛ, КХЛ, спорт
@lysenkovtv · 31,257
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
Sportcast NHL
@sportcast_nhl · 47,469
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
НХЛ | NHL | Национальная Хоккейная Лига
@nhlvk · 85,600
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
ХОККЕЙ ЗБС 🏒
@hockeyzbz · 52,242
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
🏒 ШТАБ ХОККЕИСТА
@one_hockey · 79,066
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Хайруллин Live
@tebevukhokriknut · 40,630
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
Матч! Хоккей
@hockey_match · 58,033
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
50 оттенков бронепоезда | ХК «Локомотив» Ярославль
@loko76 · 37,557
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
ЧЕРКАС АТЛАНТ
@cherkasatlant · 50,371
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Канал Алексея Шевченко, "День с Алексеем Шевченко"
@derzhiperedachu · 60,001
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Роман с Хоккеем
@hockeywithroman · 57,949
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
WORLD SPORT
@sportsrg_w · 65,444
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Хоккейные Сливки
@hockey_slivki · 34,127
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Хоккей на Кинопоиске
@hockeyonkp · 87,337
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
АренаБреда
@arena_breda · 31,271
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
ХК «Автомобилист»
@hc_avtomobilist · 57,365
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
«СЭ» Хоккейный
@sehockey · 24,534
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хоккейная Империя” (@hockey_empire), 9,245 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hockey_empire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.