11 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC33 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br3
Posted without readable text
Channel
🎯 Ӈomens ∂e Valor 🧠
@hmsvlr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,899subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001111690577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hmsvlr |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 28 February 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hmsvlr |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 5,899 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 5,908 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 5,911 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.96%
- avg views ÷ 5,899 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 115
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 October 2025 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 346 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 19s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
8 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC119 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video
A Coca-Cola quase destruiu a própria marca por causa de um teste cego! 😱🥤 Em 1985, a "New Coke" foi lançada após milhares de pesquisas apontarem que o novo sabor era melhor que o da Pepsi. O problema? Os dados ignoraram a conexão emocional dos clientes com o produto original. Foram 8 MIL ligações por dia pedindo o sabor antigo de volta. O desfecho? 79 dias depois, a fórmula clássica voltou! 💡 Moral da história: D…
4 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC194 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Sabe aquela pulseira que todo mundo usava nos anos 2000? 🫣 Assista aqui 👉👉 Acesse meu instagram
21 Jun 2026, 02:21 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Já chamou alguém de louco por acreditar em algo? Eu também já chamei. Existe um mecanismo na sua cabeça que descarta automaticamente o que você não entende. E ele já errou feio — com Tuskegee, com a CIA, com o cigarro. Quem falava sobre isso era "teórico da conspiração". Anos depois, os documentos vieram à tona. Antes de chamar alguém de louco de novo: lê esse vídeo até o fim. Quem você já descartou só porque não…
13 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC937 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video
Me segue la https://www.instagram.com/paulosiqueira.vox?igsh=YnpwMWR5cDdicDN2
4 Jun 2026, 23:33 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video
Todo mundo viu a polêmica. Quase ninguém viu os 4 movimentos. 👇 Quando uma pergunta legítima vira um caso de poder, não é acidente — é padrão. Deflexão com status. Silenciamento público. Escassez por curadoria. E a distinção que ninguém fez: ser o maior não é o mesmo que ser o melhor. Cada movimento tem um nome. E quando você aprende a nomear, você para de ser surpreendido. Qual dos 4 você já viveu? Conta nos com…
2 Jun 2026, 23:31 UTC884 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video
O Brasil não virou fã de tênis. Virou fã de uma história. ↓ Isso já aconteceu antes — em 2000, com o Guga. E aconteceu de novo ontem, com o Fonseca. O mesmo mecanismo. 25 anos de diferença. Quando você entende o comportamento por trás disso, você entende algo sobre você mesmo que ninguém te contou. Comenta aqui: você torceu pelo Fonseca ou pela pessoa que você quer ser? Completo em 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 …
27 May 2026, 21:02 UTC853 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video
Como identificar uma pessoa que rouba sua conquista nas conversas 👇 Isso tem nome: narcisismo conversacional. E quase todo mundo tem um Marquinhos na vida. Você sabia que esse comportamento vem de insegurança — não de maldade? Marca aqui quem precisa ver isso 👇 #narcisismocombversacional #linguagemcorporal #comportamentohumano #comunicacao
22 May 2026, 23:14 UTC882 viewsread 12 August 2026
O maior problema do expert em algo é esse. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYp4e7CByae/?igsh=MXB0Z242M2x6Njg4Yw==
20 May 2026, 20:09 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 12 August 2026
Ja viu esse video no meu novo perfil? Corre la.
20 May 2026, 20:09 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 12 August 2026
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYkbUo_RtHx/?igsh=Z2J1NWg5YnVqMjFv
27 Apr 2026, 00:59 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @GDOMEM3SVideo
6 milhões? Bem, eu não sei, mas é estranho pra k7 e o tuga aí também acha estranho. @GDOMEM3S
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hmsvlr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 277,525 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎯 Ӈomens ∂e Valor 🧠” (@hmsvlr), 5,899 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hmsvlr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.