У нас тут сундук с сокровищами Размер сундука 80*40 h-45 Трубочки ширина 20 спица 2 мм Туда поместилось ВСЁ! И даже место осталось 🧸🚗
❤84🔥46👍22😍8

Channel
@hm_by_polina_mayorova
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,358subscribers
-525 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001646796907 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hm_by_polina_mayorova |
| Description | 🌿 Плету уютные изделия из обычной бумаги 🌿 и обучаю этому 👆🏼 🌿 Жизнь бывшего дознавателя 👮🏼♀️ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hm_by_polina_mayorova |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 02:51 | 41,358 | -8 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:50 | 41,366 | -6 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:47 | 41,372 | -6 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:44 | 41,378 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:49 | 41,383 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:44 | 41,385 | -15 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:27 | 41,400 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:35 | 41,406 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:30 | 41,414 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 41,424 | -15 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 41,439 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:14 | 41,445 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:39 | 41,457 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 41,458 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 41,461 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 41,476 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:35 | 41,490 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 41,498 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 41,502 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:35 | 41,518 | first reading |
144 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 144 (2 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 102,010 |
| Reactions total | 4,621 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 03:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20,727 reactions across 141 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 9,640 | 46.5% | |
| ❤ | 7,055 | 34.0% | |
| 👍 | 1,808 | 8.72% | |
| 😁 | 616 | 2.97% | |
| 🎉 | 526 | 2.54% | |
| 😍 | 468 | 2.26% | |
| 👏 | 227 | 1.10% | |
| 🥰 | 191 | 0.922% | |
| 🙏 | 137 | 0.661% | |
| custom 5336882527573397827 | 53 | 0.256% | |
| 🦄 | 6 | 0.029% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 141 of the 144 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,727 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hm_by_polina_mayorova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 144 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (2.86%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
У нас тут сундук с сокровищами Размер сундука 80*40 h-45 Трубочки ширина 20 спица 2 мм Туда поместилось ВСЁ! И даже место осталось 🧸🚗
❤84🔥46👍22😍8
Мастер класс Кольцо для салфеток на праздничный стол 🐰 Можно для салфеток, а можно и на горлышко бутылки. Такие маленькие и простые сувенирчики станут приятным подарком для друзей и близких. Поэтому, запасаемся! На кольцо уходит примерно 20 трубочек. У меня они накручены на спицу 1 ширина полосы 7, но уверена, что и с классикой (10*1.5) тоже выйдет отлично 👍🏼
🔥94❤50👍22
Привет! В кино вышел фильм «Плетеный муж». Я сначала думала, что это игра слов 🙉 Но когда увидела кадры с плетущим Питером Динклейджем и реально плетеным Сашкой Скарсгардом (шведская династия Скарсгардов просто умопомрачительная, обожаю 🫠), строго решила, что надо идти! Ищу себе компанию в кино! Может какие идеи почерпнем))) Но на первый взгляд, там «саржевое» 😁
😁62🔥30❤14👍14
Девочки, смотрите. У меня есть мк по созданию подвески в виде головы оленя (универсальный новогодний герой), а ИИ мне предложил не хитрым способом превратить оленя в козу и барана. (Второе фото - видоизменение моего фото с помощью ИИ) На какой-нибудь шнурочек из красного бархата и шикарно будет 🔥 Шнур заказала тут, правда доставка две недели, но я подожду 🤗
🔥83❤36👍20👏3🦄2custom 53368825275733978272🥰1
Дорогие друзья! Поздравляю с Днём народного единства! Желаю добра и благополучия вашему дому. Пусть в сердце всегда живет радость, а рядом будут верные и близкие люди. Рада иметь с вами любимое общее дело♥️ А к нам с Андреем присоединился Антон, теперь мы болеем втроем. Первые два дня я лезла на стену, из-за того, что «горят» мои дела, но сегодня пришло смирение с неизбежностью и я включила любимый мультфильм детств…
❤90🔥19🙏13👍2
Друзья, привет! Нас с Андреем посетила дикая инфлюэнция, лежим с температурой 39, здесь же кормимся. Хотела с вами завтра встретиться на прямом эфире, но, увы, придется перенести. Однако ⬇️ Я знаю, чего у нас с вами очень давно не было! ПЕРЕКЛИЧКИ!! Ну или, как там у блохеров: пост-знакомство 🤗 Я начну: - Полина, 36 лет, весы ♎️, Москва - юрист, бывший дознаватель, капитан полиции 👮🏼♀️ - плету из бумажной лозы…
❤112🔥29🙏18👍3custom 53368825275733978272🥰1🦄1
Привет! До нового года два месяца, Москва уже украшается, а магазины завалены елочными игрушками ♥️ Предлагаю в этом году украсить елку игрушками ручной работы! На видео украшение «клеточка» Лоза 1*7 цвет сливочный дуб (дуб+береза сафора + вода 1:1:3) В копилочку плетеных елочных игрушек ✅
🔥82❤32👍23🙏2😍1
У мамули сегодня юбилей ♥️ Видео с ватной игрушкой прошлогоднее, но очень милое 🥰
❤137🔥53🎉40
Привет, друзья! Корзина двойным ситцем. Смотрится интересно, а принцип плетения не меняется. Из нюансов: закрытие последнего ряда. Обрезаем нижнюю трубочку у первой и догоняющей пары , и проплетаем несколько рядов, например веревочки. Тогда переход получается плавным (если обрезать все трубочки в каждой паре, то получится ступенька) Приятного творчества и с последним днём октября 🍂
🔥163👍54❤31😍4
Друзья, привет! Напоминаю моим пчелкам из обучения вате, что необходимо добавиться в чат! Ссылка на чат у вас на почте. Кто еще хочет присоединиться к обучению - вот ссылка Старт 2 ноября ♥️
❤42🔥28😍7👍3
Привет! Посмотрите, каких атасных корзин на этой неделе наплели наши пчелки! Считаю, что такой результат заслуживает ваших сердечек ♥️ А я готовлюсь к нашему вечернему вебинару, будем обсуждать пчелиные вопросы по текущему корзинному модулю 🐝
❤106🔥47👍17👏1
Про лаки. Для новичков Нам лак понадобится на двух этапах: 1. Обработка трубочек 2. Финиш готового изделия Популярным лаком является ВГТ акриловый бесцветный для внутренних и наружных работ. Ссылка Если глянцевый, то для обработки хватит одного слоя, если матовый, то, скорее всего - два Девочки - мастера, ваш опыт в комментариях будет очень ценен 🫶🏼
❤56👍29🔥13
Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @hm_by_polina_mayorova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@hm_by_polina_mayorova edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 4 posts on @hm_by_polina_mayorova as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Полина Майорова. Плетение из бумажной лозы” (@hm_by_polina_mayorova), 41,358 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hm_by_polina_mayorova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.