MTR港女超短裙,白滑腳超吸睛! https://jingdailyhk.org/r/17O6a 🧔🏻♂️全港最強男士全方位雜誌🧔🏻♂️ (限制谷睇bio入) 廣告查詢-> @jinggor_ad

Channel
@hksucks 港女流出專區
@hksucks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,214subscribers
-126 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004344138840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hksucks |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hksucks |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 9,214 | -102 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 9,316 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 9,340 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 9,340 | first reading |
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.8%
- avg views ÷ 9,214 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,550
- 58 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.185%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 58
- of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 89,929 |
| Reactions total | 123 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 112
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 67
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
123 reactions across 34 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 94 | 76.4% | |
| 🌭 | 11 | 8.94% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 4.07% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 3.25% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 2.44% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.44% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.813% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
【超靚】最新港女不雅片流出! 電腦硬碟維修私密片出土瘋傳 https://jingdailyhk.org/r/XNPKV 🧔🏻♂️全港最強男士全方位雜誌🧔🏻♂️ (限制谷睇bio入) 廣告查詢-> @jinggor_ad
👍3
【限時刪】疑極限n號谷流出 1X歲堅處女自慰片! 高清超嫩陰唇全露出勿轉載勿下載! https://jingdailyhk.org/r/lZE72 🧔🏻♂️全港最強男士全方位雜誌🧔🏻♂️ (限制谷睇bio入) 廣告查詢-> @jinggor_ad
屌晒咁多個好唔好? 🧔🏻♂️全港最強男士全方位雜誌🧔🏻♂️ (限制谷睇bio入) 廣告查詢-> @jinggor_ad
🔥1
大癲!移英港女搭上鬼佬遭超open玩埋「肛交」! 極噴血影片曝光 https://jingdailyhk.org/r/lZE7N 🧔🏻♂️全港最強男士全方位雜誌🧔🏻♂️ (限制谷睇bio入) 廣告查詢-> @jinggor_ad
【見樣】90後白滑港女陳穎X 全裸遭掐胸 不雅影片流出 學校瘋傳中 https://jingdailyhk.org/r/YD1aD 🧔🏻♂️全港最強男士全方位雜誌🧔🏻♂️ (限制谷睇bio入) 廣告查詢-> @jinggor_ad
港男嗒上00後補習學生妹豬! 日日瘋狂做愛 後入片曝光瘋傳中 https://jingdailyhk.org/r/4vDBa 🧔🏻♂️全港最強男士全方位雜誌🧔🏻♂️ (限制谷睇bio入) 廣告查詢-> @jinggor_ad
❤3
睇到扯扯地.... 🧔🏻♂️全港最強男士全方位雜誌🧔🏻♂️ (限制谷睇bio入) 廣告查詢-> @jinggor_ad
少女疑中邪情降 被柯尿射面邊口交飲晒超大癲! 超失常極淫蕩 https://jingdailyhk.org/r/noEOQ 🧔🏻♂️全港最強男士全方位雜誌🧔🏻♂️ (限制谷睇bio入) 廣告查詢-> @jinggor_ad
❤2
巴打討論區呻移民英國「阿女大個咗學壞」 結識賤sp自慰片遭出賣洩出 警已報 -> https://t.me/+8XJW1Aj13V84ZDhl
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3🌭2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @hksucks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@hksucks 港女流出專區” (@hksucks), 9,214 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hksucks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.