【我哋應否對支那人「抗爭」冷嘲熱諷?】 我哋永遠要拎住民族利益同情感去衡量。支那人以前嘅所作所為,十惡不赦,在此不贅。而連登打手重重覆覆嘅原因不外乎以下: 1. 認為支那民主自由化對香港有利 呢種諗法重蹈大中華主義者嘅錯。因為如果支那變咗做民主政體,佢對周遭地區嘅侵略更有民意賦予嘅認受性,好似俄羅斯國內對烏克蘭入侵嘅態度。支那人對香港人嘅敵意本來就唔會煙消雲散,民主化嘅支那對香港嘅生存更具威脅。 2. 左膠大愛,普世價值 打手不斷重覆「認同民主自由嘅價值就要幫」,世上就係有民族唔值得擁抱呢啲美好價值,由尤係對我哋有敵意嘅民族,我哋最希望支那人生活悲苦、受盡折磨。 3. 香港人要支持「敵人嘅敵人」 支那人係中共嘅敵人,所以我哋要支持?支那人=支那=中共,佢哋嘅本質只係一體幾面。中共係敵人,支那人更加係香港人嘅敵人。香港人嘅苦難最大嘅源頭來自你同我身邊經過嘅支那人。 4. 以德報怨 支那人自身承受嘅屈辱同苦難都係佢哋自招,任何善…

Channel
《香港革命指南》
@hkmanual
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6,755subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001198401001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hkmanual |
| Description | 《香港革命指南》正式啟動! 戰場需要嘅Gear係豬咀槍械,思想上嘅武裝就更不可或缺。我哋會提供革命意識或戰場裝備嘅相關資訊,同時為大家拆解散水黨瓦解革命嘅技倆,提防思想陷阱,以正視聽。 民族自強,香港獨立! |
| Created | 25 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hkmanual |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 6,755 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 6,764 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 6,769 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 6,774 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 6,774 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 180
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 122
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
2019年11月8日,周梓樂同學先我哋而去。 各位有為我哋受苦受難嘅兄弟姊妹繼續奮鬥嗎?
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
每年嘅七月一日,我哋藉住誦讀 梁先生嘅義舉同精神,勉勵仍然為香港奮鬥嘅族內兄弟姊妹,同時不忘所有為港犧牲嘅烈士。 梁烈士嘅犧牲全為香港,我哋務必回報佢嘅付出。 梁健輝先生係香港嘅民族英雄,二零二一年七月一日 梁烈士喺銅鑼灣東角道崇光百貨用短刀刺向一警,然後以刀自刺胸口,同日不治,享年五十歲。 民族英雄 英靈不朽 浩氣長存
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hkmanual. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 952,551 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@hkmanual named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“《香港革命指南》” (@hkmanual), 6,755 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hkmanual.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.