Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

香港金融銀行同路人頻道

@hkfinancefellow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,550subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001359472344
TypeChannel
Username@hkfinancefellow
Created26 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hkfinancefellow

Growth

3,5503,5713,560.56 August 2026 — 3,571 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,571 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,569 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,565 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,555 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,550 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,547–3,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:163,550-5
12 Aug 2026, 12:383,555-10
9 Aug 2026, 21:323,565-4
6 Aug 2026, 20:103,569-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:173,571no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:073,571first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 9 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 27s
Average length
3m 44s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Jun 2026, 20:19 UTC490 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hkposter777Photo

2019.6.12 清晨,萬人響應大三罷,包圍政府總部,力阻送中惡法二讀。 下午三時,抗爭者衝入立法會示威區,警察發射橡膠子彈和催淚彈,毒煙隨即沖天而起。 倘若我們忘記歷史,任由血與淚的記憶凋謝零落,那麼,民族就沒有未來。 #當年今日 #反送中 #毋忘抗爭 #毋忘2019 #PoliceBrutality #催淚彈 #橡膠子彈

31 Aug 2025, 12:58 UTC≈2,730 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hkposter777Photo

#太子站 #831恐怖襲擊 #太子831 #太子恐襲 #831PrinceEdward art by Ricker Choi @ricker_choi

21 Jul 2025, 14:06 UTC≈3,610 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

// 721 #元朗 白衣人 #無差別襲擊 事件至今六年,警方在事件中共拘捕69人,落案檢控22人,包括14名白衣人以及8名非白衣人,所有案件目前已結案,其中一名白衣人脫罪,其餘全部 #暴動罪 成,分別被判監禁由2年1個月至7年不等,部份人白衣人同涉傷人等罪項,而前立法會議員林卓廷等人正就判決進行上訴。 事件發生翌日 [#2019年7月22日],時任行政長官 #林鄭月娥 曾公開譴責施襲者「目無法紀」,然而警方往後的論述以「勢均力敵」、「#集體毆鬥」等用字形容事件,引發社會譁然。隨著案件進入司法程序,不同法官對案件定性亦有明顯分歧,有法官指白衣人「#自組武裝力量」#私刑 製造恐慌,亦有法官形容「非白衣人挑釁白衣人,#以暴易暴。」// 【721六周年.圖解DATA|僅13白衣人判囚 林卓廷等8人罪成 回顧官方定性轉變與法庭判詞分歧】 [#2025年7月21日 #追新聞 #TheChaser] #721元朗恐襲 #元朗站

31 Aug 2024, 05:48 UTC≈5,440 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hkposter777Video

五年前 2019.8.31 晚上太子站警員無差別襲擊市民事件 有線新聞報導: 速龍小隊衝落太子站月台拘捕多人 車廂內多人頭破血流 有人掩著後腦 #太子831 #速龍 #太子恐襲 #黑警 #警暴 #黑警死全家 #每日一願望黑警冚家亡 #反送中5週年 #反送中 #毋忘2019 #毋忘抗爭 #當年今日

5 Aug 2024, 04:19 UTC≈4,570 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @inmediahknetPhoto

【當年今日|反修例回顧】2019年8月1日:段崇智與學生會面 金融界中環快閃集會 https://bit.ly/3WJEuDb 2019年8月1日,中大校長段崇智與學生會面,被追問對成立獨立調查委員會及警方濫暴等的看法。時任中大學生會會長蘇浚鋒在會後批評,段崇智的回應是「不斷帶同學遊花園」。 晚上,逾千名金融從業員在中環遮打花園快閃集會,高叫「香港人,加油!」、「罷工!」等口號。有參加者接受訪問,稱金融業雖一直被視為不敢發聲的一群,但覺得「如果再唔為香港發聲,就會太遲」。 警方當晚亦於火炭搜查一個工廈單位,發現行山杖、煙霧餅、白汽油等物品。7男1女當晚被捕,其中4名男子事隔逾兩年後,被控管有攻擊性武器、管有爆炸品等罪。4人認罪,判囚16個月至38個月。

21 Jul 2024, 11:39 UTC≈3,090 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @HKReaderXWriterVideo

不能忘記7.21 #721元朗恐襲 #五年

24 Jun 2024, 10:53 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hkposter777Photo

2024.06.23 《蘋果日報》結束營運3年 #黎智英 #JimmyLai #蘋果日報 #AppleDaily #新聞自由無價 #守護真相 #撐蘋果 #壹傳媒 #滅聲 #欲加之罪 Art by @lauyanhin 劉仁顯

9 Jun 2024, 06:32 UTC≈2,790 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @the_chaser_newsPhoto

【5 years ago today - 9 JUN 2019】 The Civil Human Rights Front initiated the third protest against the amendment of the Extradition Law, with 1.03 million Hongkongers taking to the streets, marking the beginning of the anti-extradition movement. That evening, the Hong Kong government announced that the second reading debate on June 12 would proceed as scheduled. Later that night, some protesters attempted to occupy th

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @hkfinancefellow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 944,842 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“香港金融銀行同路人頻道” (@hkfinancefellow), 3,550 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hkfinancefellow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.