Серия фотографий улицы Чистопольской и как она изменилась за последние 20 с лишним лет. Руслан Бикуев | Историческая Казань В MAX
❤🔥30👏9

Channel
@history_tatarstan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
8,350subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001466299602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @history_tatarstan |
| Description | Автор блога - Руслан Бикуев Ценитель архитектуры и истории Казани / Татарстана Вопросы/Сотрудничество @bikuev |
| Created | 10 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/history_tatarstan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 8,350 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 8,359 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 8,369 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:10 | 8,378 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 8,377 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (31 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,160 |
| Reactions total | 490 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
451 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 171 | 37.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 111 | 24.6% | |
| 👏 | 83 | 18.4% | |
| 💔 | 57 | 12.6% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 2.88% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 1.55% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.887% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.665% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.443% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 490reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwLLLFc | 1 | 31 July 2026 | 31 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Серия фотографий улицы Чистопольской и как она изменилась за последние 20 с лишним лет. Руслан Бикуев | Историческая Казань В MAX
❤🔥30👏9
Небольшая серия фотографий Свияжска, сделанная 13 августа 1989 года Юрием Ивановичем Фроловым, и небольшой эксперимент с цветом от меня. Вся профессиональная деятельность Юрия Ивановича Фролова была связана с Казанским университетом, где более 45 лет он работал на кафедре журналистики. Исследовательская и преподавательская деятельность Юрия Ивановича охватывала широкий круг тем, включая историю Казани и Татарстана, …
👏24🔥5
Казанский «Том Сойер фест» и ДК Химиков приглашают казанцев присоединиться к восстановлению легендарной мозаики «Посадим сады!»🌳 12 и 13 августа в ДК Химиков на Ямашева,1 начнутся работы по восстановлению монументального мозаичного панно «Посадим сады!». 🤝 Партнёры, волонтёры и координаторы движения по восстановлению исторической среды «Том Сойер Фест — Казань» отозвались на сигналы резиденции молодежи «ДК Химиков»…
🔥11👏5⚡3
Уже 15 лет прошло с того момента, когда парк «Чёрное озеро» мог превратиться в парковку. Но есть одна удивительная особенность человеческой памяти: хорошее мы почему-то забываем гораздо быстрее, чем плохое. https://t.me/trovoopik/411
❤🔥9👏9🔥6💯2
Очень точно Марк Шишкин высказался о частных музеях https://t.me/tsarofkazan/3602
❤🔥8
Редкий кадр «Городского театра» в Казани. Именно ночной. Театр находился на тогдашней Театральной площади, нынешней площади Свободы, примерно на месте сегодняшнего сквера с памятником Ленину. Интересный момент. Если вы видите фотографию улицы начала XX века, где уже есть электрические фонари, это ещё совсем не означает, что фотограф мог легко снять эту улицу ночью. Фонарь освещал лишь небольшой участок, а для фотопл…
💔17🔥13
Под Казанским кремлём, на реке Казанке, в конце XIX века работала крупная водяная мукомольная мельница с плотиной-запрудой. Её можно увидеть на старых фотографиях, сделанных ещё до появления современной Кремлёвской набережной (ориентир «Зоя» и «Авылым»). Старые источники описывают мельницу как большое пятиэтажное здание, стоявшее на островке и окружённое системой каналов и шлюзов. Главным элементом всего комплекса …
🔥25❤🔥5
На этой старой фотографии ещё нет привычной нам улицы Бутлерова. Перед нами Ново-Горшечная, одна из улиц дореволюционной Казани, которой только предстояло стать частью хорошо знакомого сегодня городского пейзажа. В 1927 году улице дадут новое имя в честь Александра Михайловича Бутлерова, выдающегося русского химика. Слева на снимке стоит дом Дятловой. А справа, пока ещё за пределами кадра, история этой улицы только…
🔥20❤🔥8👌3
Серия фотографий района улицы Пушкина. Как это место изменилось за последние 20–25 лет. Руслан Бикуев | Историческая Казань
🔥19💔10👏7⚡1
Казанский «Парфенон». КФЭИ (ныне КФУ) в 1951 году. Фото: И. Папков. Руслан Бикуев | Историческая Казань
🔥25❤🔥7
Когда начинаешь внимательно рассматривать старую прессу за 2010 год, иногда обнаруживаешь в ней настоящие зачатки будущих архитектурных идей. Вот, кажется, один из таких любопытных примеров. Идея конструкции, построенного в форме льдин. Интересно, что сегодня эта форма неожиданно перекликается с архитектурой нового театра Камала. Руслан Бикуев | Историческая Казань
❤🔥11👌1
Сколько пытался смонтировать наше видео с Дмитрием Зыковым о «сталинке» на Декабристов не получалось, но все равно твое архивное видео 2021 года с твоей ленты лучшее всего показывает атмосферу этого дома. Сталинка на Декабристов один из самых заметных домов послевоенной Казани стоит на пересечении улиц Декабристов и Шамиля Усманова — жилой дом мелькомбината, №183. Его строили в 1949–1954 годах для работников мелько…
❤🔥30🔥5⚡3💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @history_tatarstan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 540,906 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Историческая Казань | Руслан Бикуев” (@history_tatarstan), 8,350 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/history_tatarstan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.