Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for هیستو | انتخاب رشته 🎓

Channel

هیستو | انتخاب رشته 🎓

@historeshte

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,585subscribers

+4,228 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003742691524
TypeChannel
Username@historeshte
Created2 September 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/historeshte

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3574,5852,4712 September 2026 — 357 subscribers3 September 2026 — 688 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,092 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,610 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,585 subscribers2 September 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net +4,228. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:594,585+975
14 Sept 2026, 14:173,610+518
11 Sept 2026, 09:403,092+2,404
3 Sept 2026, 10:55688+331
2 Sept 2026, 23:15357first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 2 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.53%
avg views ÷ 4,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
437
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held7 (2 September 20262 September 2026)
Views total2,622
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6678.6%
😁78.33%
👍44.76%
🥰33.57%
💔22.38%
🔥11.19%
😍11.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:57 UTC390 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

یعنی شما با خیال راحت می‌تونین کد رشته هارو از خوشبینانه ترین ها بچینین و بیاین پایین و هیچ مشکلی پیش نمیاد! مثلا می‌تونی ۵۰ تای اول رو کد رشته هایی رو بذاری که خوشبینانه‌ن و خودتم میدونی شانس قبولیت تو اینا کمه ولی دوست داری قبول بشی! اینا رو بالا میذاریم از کجا معلوم شاید خوش شانس بودی و قبول شدی! بعدش مثلا ۵۰ تای بعدی رو کد رشته های منطقی رو میذاریم همونایی که میدونیم به احتمال بالا قبول میشی و در آخر، ۵۰ تای بعد

13🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 20:50 UTC437 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

خب پس دیدیم که خیلیاتون با اصول ابتدایی انتخاب رشته آشنایی ندارین🫩 سیستم گزینش سازمان سنجش چجوریه؟ به این شکله که فرد به فرد براساس رتبه بررسی میکنه نه براساس اینکه کی بالاتر زده فلان کد رشته رو! یعنی از رتبه ۱ شروع میکنه دونه به دونه نگاه می‌کنه ببینه چیا انتخاب کرده داوطلب؟ بعد تو اولین نقطه ای که ظرفیت خالی وجود داشته باشه، انتخاب رشته داوطلب متوقف میشه فرض کنین سیستم گزینش سازمان سنجش از رتبه ۱ شروع کرده و حالا

11👍2

2 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTC461 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

برای قبولی شانس جعفر بیشتره یا ممد ؟

  1. ممد، چون رتبه اش بهتره43%
  2. جعفر، چون تو اولویت اول زده بود اون رشته رو57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9💔2👍1🥰1😁1

2 Sept 2026, 19:48 UTC448 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

خب اول با یه مثال شروع کنیم فرض کنین ۲ تا دانش آموز داریم یکیش ممد اون یکی هم جعفر ممد رتبه اش شده ۷۰۰ اما جعفر رتبه اش شده ۸۰۰ و هر دوی اینا، هدفشون کد رشته a هست و میخوان تو این کد رشته قبول بشن موقع انتخاب رشته، جعفر این کد رشته a رو به عنوان اولویت اول میزنه اما ممد این کد رشته رو به عنوان اولویت دهم میزنه و قبلش ۹ تا کد رشته دیگه هم انتخاب میکنه! حالا بگین ببینم برای سازمان سنجش، ممد تو اولویته یا جعفر؟ و شانس ک

8😁4🥰2👍1

2 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC412 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

خب بریم که شروع کنیم تو این کانال قراره راجب رشته های مختلف و دوران مهم انتخاب رشته صحبت کنیم ولی خب قبل اینکه بریم سراغ بررسی رشته ها، اول باید با کلیات انتخاب رشته شروع کنیم و از صفر توضیح بدم همه چیو اولین موضوعی که راجبش صحبت می‌کنیم درباره سیستم انتخاب رشته سازمان سنجش هست و اینکه انتخاب رشته چجوری انجام میشه دیگه گلابی تر از این نداریم که ؟🙄 @Historeshte

12😁2😍1

2 Sept 2026, 18:51 UTC474 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

فعالیت این کانال از امشب شروع میشه

13

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @historeshte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 19:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz207 voters

برای قبولی شانس جعفر بیشتره یا ممد ؟

  1. ممد، چون رتبه اش بهتره43%
  2. جعفر، چون تو اولویت اول زده بود اون رشته رو57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هیستو | انتخاب رشته 🎓” (@historeshte), 4,585 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/historeshte.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.