Channel
@hira_oni
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
384subscribers
+52 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002312163782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hira_oni |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hira_oni |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 384 | +50 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 334 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 332 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 332 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (18 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,706 |
| Reactions total | 172 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
172 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5296448949534626331 | 48 | 27.9% | |
| custom 5346045213234176992 | 45 | 26.2% | |
| custom 5266995884884767812 | 24 | 14.0% | |
| custom 5850459121802809907 | 24 | 14.0% | |
| custom 5445238479367717188 | 19 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5361756396876479013 | 4 | 2.33% | |
| custom 5363857743985784309 | 4 | 2.33% | |
| custom 5400376721327275008 | 4 | 2.33% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот немного то чего я торговал на bnb, можете вбить имя токена и глянуть как это выглядело И да, я показал лучшее, а так я слил вообще уже около полутора bnb за все время, не думайте что все так просто как я показываю. Но явно проще чем сол т.к там я слил многократно выше чем полторашка bnb.
custom 53460452132341769926custom 54452384793677171883
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
Трекер для GmGn который я собрал за время торговли, по моему мнению там собраны самые моушеновые акки с китая, дальше сами дособираете если надо будет
custom 53460452132341769923custom 54452384793677171883
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
1) https://x.com/feibo03/status/1992069703943291111 2) https://x.com/feibo03/status/1999865342672437358 Спросите что за статьи? Овер базовые статьи как торговать на bnb и почему именно он? Лично по моему мнению на данный момент bnb будет куда благоприятнее чем sol просто потому что там хоть и меньше вольюма и токенов но когда CZ или подобные крупные личности пишут посты, то снайпить токен можно на изи т.к они вампя…
custom 53460452132341769923custom 54452384793677171882
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
Attention Market - ты торгуешь самим вниманием То есть можно ставить не на "будет ли монета расти" а на то сколько внимания получит какой-то тренд, мем, идея, момент, персона или тема прямо сейчас и в ближайшее время Начинается с того что ты торгуешь и за 1Sol вольюма получаешь 1 звезду - если проект продержится активно месяц то все звезды твои они обернут в аирдроп и раздадут Даже если дропа не будет то это точно…
custom 52669958848847678123custom 52964489495346263313
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 529644894953462633110custom 54452384793677171883custom 52669958848847678122
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
🤩 Так же мой конфиг в котором убран некоторый ненужный визуал. Многим GmGn прегружен после аксиома и в моем конфиге гм смотрится чуть проще для глаз И расширение для браузера от Ego которое он еще дропал с пол года+ назад. Ширка дает возможность убрать квикбай и некоторый визуал гмгн И так же мои валеты - они активно торгую и нью токены и мигру многие Дрейна в файлах нет а проверить всё можете на сайте - https://w…
custom 52964489495346263315custom 58504591218028099073custom 53460452132341769922
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
🤩 Как я упоминал в постах выше, моя стратегия основная это торговля токенами в колонке миграций Да изредко я смотрю и полу миграции но это довольно редкий случай т.к нужен или оч сильный наротив или очень хороший вольюм на токене чтобы он пробил мои 3фиса (если до мигры дошло даже не набрав 3фис то токен фулл хуйня) Если мы смотрим именно в сторону органики. Раннеры на миграциях торговать довольно спорный вопрос - е…
custom 53460452132341769926custom 52964489495346263314custom 58504591218028099073
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
Недавно мне исполнился тот возраст, когда должен был добиться успеха. И изменилось из-за этого... ровным счетом ничего(успеха ещё не достиг). Я остался на том же месте, что и года 4 назад.📆 Хоть занимался форексам, проходил обучение, даже были первые результаты, опыт накатывал, а когда перешёл на мем-трейдинг то там были еще better результаты, 1к$💸 в начале пути заработал, но я замедлился. Результаты вроде есть, но …
custom 52669958848847678129custom 53460452132341769925custom 52964489495346263313
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
😈
custom 52964489495346263317custom 53460452132341769924custom 58504591218028099073custom 54452384793677171882
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
Никогда не видел такое количество подрубленых стримов разом у тренчеров 😏
custom 53460452132341769925custom 52669958848847678124custom 52964489495346263313
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52964489495346263315custom 53460452132341769924custom 52669958848847678123custom 58504591218028099072
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
😈 Если бы от дрочки ты не беднел, никто бы её не считал проблемой Настоящая беда - не рука и не хуй, а то что ты спускаешь время и возможности заработать
custom 52964489495346263318custom 52669958848847678123custom 54452384793677171882custom 58504591218028099072
Signed 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗮
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @hira_oni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 682,048 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗦𝗛𝗜𝗥𝗔 𝗟𝗜𝗠𝗕𝗢” (@hira_oni), 384 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hira_oni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.