В итоговом сочинении теперь есть исторические темы, подписывайтесь на Асю, она расскажет, как к ним подготовиться🫶 Ждем дроп демки по химии😡
❤5

Channel
@himichka_egeland
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
13,647subscribers
+8,181 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003724462129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @himichka_egeland |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/himichka_egeland |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 13,647 | +314 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 13,333 | +303 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 13,030 | +521 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 12,509 | +238 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 12,271 | +925 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 11,346 | +1,527 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:44 | 9,819 | +402 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 9,417 | +347 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 9,070 | +414 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 8,656 | +1,000 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 7,656 | +974 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 6,682 | +417 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 6,265 | +646 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 5,619 | +152 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 5,467 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 5,466 | first reading |
75 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,227 |
| Reactions total | 296 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,211 reactions across 73 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 834 | 68.9% | |
| 🔥 | 168 | 13.9% | |
| 🥰 | 40 | 3.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 3.22% | |
| 💘 | 29 | 2.39% | |
| 💋 | 23 | 1.90% | |
| 😭 | 17 | 1.40% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 0.826% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 0.661% | |
| 🆒 | 7 | 0.578% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 0.578% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 0.578% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.495% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.33% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.248% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.165% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.165% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.165% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.083% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.083% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.083% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В итоговом сочинении теперь есть исторические темы, подписывайтесь на Асю, она расскажет, как к ним подготовиться🫶 Ждем дроп демки по химии😡
❤5
В этом канале будут разборы новых тем)) Кто рад?
❤3😭1
Чувствую, что ФИПИ нас просто байтит…
❤16
Video message, posted without a caption
❤12
ШПОРА ПО ПОЛИМЕРАМ И ИХ ПРИМЕНЕНИЮ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Все, поздравляю, теперь вы гуру химии и знаете все, что могут спросить в задании №25🥇 Не забудьте поделиться с друзьями, чтобы они тоже сдали химию на 80+ 🐱 🔵подготовка со мной
🔥7❤2
ПРО НЕФТЬ ДЛЯ ЗАДАНИЯ №25 ИЗ ЕГЭ✍️ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Я же обещала, что сегодня пользы будет море! Запоминаем все, что могут спросить на ЕГЭ про нефтепереработку: Нефть — маслянистая жидкость от светло-бурого до черного цвета с характерным запахом, природного происхождения, состоящая из смеси различных углеводородов. В рамках ЕГЭ важно знать про этапы ее переработки. 1. Первичная переработка …
❤14💘6❤🔥4🔥3
ВСЕ ПРО ПРОИЗВОДСТВА ДЛЯ ЗАДАНИЯ №25 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Ссобрала для вас самую важную теорию про производства серной кислоты, аммиака и метанола. Что обязательно нужно запомнить для ЕГЭ: 1️⃣ Серная кислота Первый этап: обжиг пирита в печи для обжига в кипящем слое 4FeS2 + 11O2 → 8SO2 + 2Fe2O3 Второй этап: очистка полученного сернистого газа в циклоне и электрофильтре Третий этап: окисление…
❤10❤🔥6🔥2
Пристегнитесь, иначе вас снесет количеством пользы🚨 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ СЕГОДНЯ ОТДАЮ ВСЮ ТЕОРИЮ ДЛЯ ЗАДАНИЯ №25, ВКЛЮЧАЙТЕ УВЕДОМЛЕНИЯ Для начала разобрала для вас все задания на области применения веществ из банка ФИПИ за 6 минут 👆 СКАЧАТЬ ШПОРУ МОЖНО ТУТ А записаться на годовой курс и подготовиться ко всем подвохам экзамена тут👈 #задание25
❤7
Дождались демок, пока только на ОГЭ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ Изменений в заданиях нет, но это не значит что такого не будет в ЕГЭ Демоверсия ЕГЭ выйдет 28 августа, поэтому следим за каналом и ждем разбора демки в прямом эфире! Вместе с разбром получите от меня: 🔵 Полностью решенный КИМ демоверсии 2027 🔵 Файл с полным кодификатором и спецификатором 🔵 Инфу по всем изменениям в экзамене 2027 Ждем,…
❤7💘3🔥2👍1
Через год на их месте окажетесь ВЫ! Смотрите в какие ВУЗы поступили ребята с моего годового курса 2027, как вам такие боссы химбио? Уже в следующем году ими можете стать вы, а сейчас еще и начать учиться со скидкой 40%! Начинаем эфир-реалити через полтора часа! ЗАБРАТЬ МЕСТО НА ЭФИР И ПОЛУЧИТЬ СКИДКУ НА ГОДОВОЙ КУРС
❤9
Поехала искать демки в Беларусь🔎
❤25👍2❤🔥1
Демоверсия может выйти сегодня, завтра или еще позже А вот 33 и 34 задачи уже сейчас знают, что им предстоит испортить кому-то настроение на экзамене 🥰 Сегодня удача с демкой снова не на нашей стороне, поэтому вместо неё расскажу о том, что точно останется неизменным — сложные расчетные задачи никуда не денутся 🔴Поэтому в годовом курсе я заложила огромный блок на 33 и 34 задания: более 30 вебинаров посвящены именн…
🥰6❤4🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @himichka_egeland. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В растворе соляной кислоты не растворяется…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Иду проверять, посмотрели ли вы мини-урок🕵️ Выберите пару веществ, которая НЕ реагирует друг с другом:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
До начала учебы месяц, как себя чувствуете сейчас?
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Женя Химичка из ЕГЭЛЕНД” (@himichka_egeland), 13,647 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/himichka_egeland.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.