🦴🎁 🎀🤩r opi𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑛 ab𝑜𝑢𝑡 mе ?! 😀😀🦴 оски и негатив мм не😉
🦄4custom 63145525688863345924custom 53370973575425777343

Channel
@himedererelate
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003265646791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @himedererelate |
| Created | 26 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/himedererelate |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 66 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 72 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 74 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 74 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 26 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (26 October 2025 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 90 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
118 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5418000556985703049 | 18 | 15.3% | |
| custom 6314552568886334592 | 18 | 15.3% | |
| 🦄 | 14 | 11.9% | |
| 🍓 | 11 | 9.32% | |
| custom 5337090210717010680 | 10 | 8.47% | |
| custom 5402515340162778477 | 10 | 8.47% | |
| custom 5337097357542577734 | 9 | 7.63% | |
| custom 5271790709064636362 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5323530762740328567 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5386815512414024159 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5411273439904288028 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5427218128033583374 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| custom 5249017297812616041 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| custom 5251683725179120902 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| custom 5440805935679307782 | 1 | 0.847% |
Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @himedererelate. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 October 2025 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🦴🎁 🎀🤩r opi𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑛 ab𝑜𝑢𝑡 mе ?! 😀😀🦴 оски и негатив мм не😉
🦄4custom 63145525688863345924custom 53370973575425777343
Sticker, posted without a caption
🦄2custom 53370973575425777342custom 63145525688863345921
Sticker, posted without a caption
🦄2custom 53370973575425777342custom 63145525688863345921
🗝🤩🤩🤩💌𝘶jin is . . . ?🤍
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 63145525688863345922💘1🦄1custom 53370973575425777341
Sticker, posted without a caption
🦄2custom 63145525688863345922custom 53370973575425777341
𝓜𝘺 𝘚𝑃 🟥🟧
custom 63145525688863345925💘2custom 53235307627403285672🍓1
🤩🤩🤩ove list 🤩🤩🤩 🤩 @𝓜𝑖𝑧i̲ ; @𝓗i𝑟𝑎𝘳𝘢 ; @ 𝓐𝘥𝑠k̲ ; @𝓢o̲f̲𝑦𝑎-𝘤ℎa𝑛 ; @𝓚𝑜m̲𝘪 ; @𝓣e̲f̲𝑖 ; @𝓜io𝑐ℎ𝘢𝘯 ; @𝓥𝑖𝘤𝘶𝑡𝑒𝑟y 🤩 . . . 𝓘 𝘩𝑖𝑡 𝑡ℎе 𝑗𝑎𝘤𝘬𝘱ot 𝘸𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑦o𝑢 𝑎𝑙l 🤩
🦄3custom 63145525688863345923custom 53235307627403285672💘1
❌❌
custom 53370902107170106808custom 52717907090646363624custom 54112734399042880284custom 53868155124140241592custom 54408059356793077821
❌ 𝓡𝑦𝚞𝑗in 🤩𝓟𝑟i̲n̲𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 4teen | 04.09 | she/her💕 E𝘕𝘛𝘑 ; 3w4 ; so3sx8sx6 ; choleric ❌𝓘 l𝑜𝑣e my s𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑡 𝓘rl Kaoru 🤩 🤩 dm | sp | anon | opinion | love 🟥🟧
custom 541800055698570304918🍓10custom 540251534016277847710custom 54272181280335833743custom 52490172978126160412custom 52516837251791209022custom 53370902107170106802custom 53868155124140241592
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @himedererelate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🗝🤩🤩🤩💌𝘶jin is . . . ?🤍
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 986,685 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𓏵. 𝓐𝘮𝘢 𝓚𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘳𝘦” (@himedererelate), 66 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/himedererelate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.