Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,010–12,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:56
12,021
-1
16 Sept 2026, 00:58
12,022
+2
14 Sept 2026, 07:18
12,020
-1
12 Sept 2026, 16:41
12,021
+4
10 Sept 2026, 18:01
12,017
-7
7 Sept 2026, 14:14
12,024
-4
4 Sept 2026, 17:18
12,028
+1
3 Sept 2026, 01:48
12,027
-9
1 Sept 2026, 23:15
12,036
-2
31 Aug 2026, 23:38
12,038
+2
30 Aug 2026, 23:04
12,036
+9
29 Aug 2026, 20:33
12,027
-10
28 Aug 2026, 20:36
12,037
+1
27 Aug 2026, 17:08
12,036
-5
26 Aug 2026, 14:36
12,041
+2
25 Aug 2026, 12:52
12,039
+1
24 Aug 2026, 13:37
12,038
-5
22 Aug 2026, 17:56
12,043
-3
21 Aug 2026, 10:37
12,046
-1
20 Aug 2026, 11:15
12,047
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
390 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
192
49.2%
👍
153
39.2%
🔥
23
5.90%
💔
9
2.31%
💯
5
1.28%
🎉
3
0.769%
👏
2
0.513%
🌚
1
0.256%
🌭
1
0.256%
🤯
1
0.256%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 390 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2025 to 16 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Friends, I promised to share important information with you and today I am fulfilling my promise! 😊 Over the past few days, my team and I have conducted a thorough search for a profitable arbitrage opportunity and thanks to market volatility influenced by global economic factors, we have found it. 📈
This opportunity will not exist for long and I am sharing it with you because my team and I have already made profits …
✍A delightful and insightful interaction with AIR 36 Muskan Srivastava today at our offline center! We dived deep into the nitty-gritties of Geography Optional and her journey through UPSC. Stay tuned — the full Topper Talk drops tomorrow!
📢 Announcement:
Himanshu Sir and Pranjal Sir are available today in ORN/Karol Bagh!
All students facing any difficulty in Geography Optional or those who wish to have one-to-one counselling for students preparing for the UPSC 2026 Attempt can meet them between 1 PM to 4 PM today.
Kindly book your slot in advance by calling on 9540226688.
👆Banna Venkatesh (Geography Optional)
Improved his rank from 467 to an impressive AIR 15 in UPSC CSE – a remarkable journey of growth & dedication.
👉He is among the many students who have shared their testimonials, highlighting the quality & consistency of work being done by Guidance IAS in the domain of Geography Optional.
👉With a solid score of 296 in Geography, Venkatesh relied extensively on Guidance IAS materi…
👆Shakeel Ahmed. A selected student of Geography Optional in 2024 based his preparation Solely on Optional Foundation & 500+ Classes.
Congratulations to him.
✍With More and More Selected Students now getting Confirmed, seems like the total number of Selections from such a small Institute like GUIDANCE IAS will cross the mark of 40+.
This is a Serious Challenge to all those Big Institutions who are finding it hard to prove even 20+ Actual selected students in a year and are relying/advertising on their Mock Interview results.
We will soon share a comprehensive list of al…
👆Ashwani Shukla. A student of GUIDANCE IAS.
Geography Optional Score: 270.
🔥5❤3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @himanshu_Sir_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Nanak Classes Rajasthan Gk GS @Nanak_Classes_Rajasthan_Gk_GS · 27,521 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 10 September 2026
Economics an addiction( Dr. Vibhas jha) @vjspeaks · 33,999 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Dr Sidharth Arora @drsidhartharora · 42,147 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
School of General Studies: UPSC CSE IAS IPS PCS NCERTs Mentorship Guidance Current Affairs Prelims Mains Tests @SGS_IAS · 31,617 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 5 September 2026
UPSC FIX 2026 - 27 - 28 @UPSCFIX · 87,185 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
PRELIMS TRICKS @prelims_tricks · 46,731 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Upsc Optional topper notes @Optional_toppers_notes · 43,722 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
TARGET UPSC by Dr.Sudarshan Lodha (AIR 571 ) @target30upsc · 73,651 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
UPSC Interview transcripts @upsc_cse_update · 28,147 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Asad Zuberi AIR 86 UPSC Resources @asad_zuberi · 23,085 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
UPSC ethics @upsc_ethics_toppers · 35,993 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Peeyush Kumar_UPSC @peeyushupsc · 39,393 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UPSC Geography by Himanshu sir & Pranjal Sir” (@himanshu_Sir_1), 12,021 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/himanshu_Sir_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.