Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🚙武汉曝光/打窝🚙

@hijackcar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,186subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002342046147
TypeChannel
Username@hijackcar
Description聊天群 @whlou6 榜单 @wuhanhua1 武汉黄鹤楼曝光/打窝/新闻
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hijackcar

Growth

5,1785,1865,1827 August 2026 — 5,183 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,178 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,186 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,177–5,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:215,186+8
8 Aug 2026, 02:385,178-5
7 Aug 2026, 18:035,183first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 5,186 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.071%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held17 (17 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total15,189
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
195
Videos
35
Links
108

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
18s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC95 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

依依老师 https://t.me/wuhanhua1/19576?single

1

11 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC282 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

预约价格400拍照评价立减20 武汉小悠带队 服务大升级 大升级服务 环境升级 全场00后00年~06顶美全新佳丽 骚的一批活好 联系客服安排顶美小姐姐 门店价格:400 到店跟前台说小悠预约可享买单价格380(需拍照点评反馈) 双飞特价仅需:750元 门店营业时间 12:00~04:00 稳定在岗10~20多位佳丽全场00后 持4T服务证上岗🕵️‍♀️ 气质御姐,风韵小嫂子,小母狗,小巧萝莉,邻家小妹,A4,大奶牛,水娃💦,黑丝吊带高跟鞋👠,好玩不贵,透明消费😀 😀服务流程如下📱 👩‍🎤 沐浴洗澡 小按开场 指滑鼻吸 👩‍🎤 胸滑全身 滚水漫游 纯舌漫游 👩‍🎤 胯下毒龙 海底捞月 莞式干磨 👩‍🎤 飞龙在天 百变调情 肾保健操 👩‍🎤 一柱擎天 激情互动 4T 齐上 👩‍🎤 各种姿势 完美释放 临别温存 门店新出特惠全场400 45分钟不限次数 多次需提前告知 环境优雅私密,每个房间都很大,带有单独淋浴,不办卡不充足

8 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC456 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @wuhanhua1Photo

武汉顶级全裸8️⃣🔠➕❓「升级版」 武汉性价比王全场预约出评价:380💰 电话预约☎️: 13349751074 微信🛰1️⃣预约: _You9876 微信🛰2️⃣预约:AAWR880 QQ🐧1️⃣预约:169317176 QQ🐧2️⃣预约:3953211804 武汉会所交流群: t.me/CMW6679 武汉技师频道: t.me/CMW6678 武汉技师点评: t.me/CMW6677 机器人🤖:@AWW998bot (进店铺报章鱼哥预约可享受优惠价) 体验完 拍照 点评发章鱼出示前台】 【 免费提供各类情趣丝袜可带走】😍 [另外提供付费换装服务+20] 服务时间50分钟、时间内不限次。 游龙戏水➕沐香丝竹🫰 纤纤玉手➕仙女漫游🫰 高山流水➕胯下游龙🫰 柔情毒龙➕猴子偷桃🫰 水磨拉丝➕百变调情🫰 花样多处➕可摸可亲可舔😍 全裸升级版超级8️⃣🔠➕❓ 1️⃣:玉女双峰夹龙棍「胸夹」 2️⃣:玉手花式唤神龙「花手」 3️⃣:皇家骑

2 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,360 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

第六步,在这里复制第四步中的内容

2 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 12 August 2026

然后就可以使用你的机器人了,你的机器人打开即可

2 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,180 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

第二步,在botfather里输入 /newbot 创建机器人

1

2 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

第三步,起一个中文名,一个英文名,英文名要以bot结尾,否则会提示用户名存在换一个

2 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

第四步,成功后会出现这个界面,点击中间的复制一下,第五步要使用这个

2 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

第五步,打开双向机器人 @sxjqr2bot 点开,然后点击添加机器人

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @hijackcar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,071,164 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🚙武汉曝光/打窝🚙” (@hijackcar), 5,186 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hijackcar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.