So Simple vs. Much Better 🪄✨ Credit: ratuanditya on Instagram #hijab #outfit #funny #style 🤎 @HiJAB
❤65🥰12👏6🔥5❤🔥1

Channel
@hijab
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
8,128subscribers
-140 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001045775099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hijab |
| Description | • hijab design • style hijab korea • hijab dress • satin hijab • hijab style • outfit hoodie hijab • fashion hijab • hijab wear • hijab scarf styles • hijab girls • hijab casual jeans • jilbab fashion • indonesia style • hijab casual jeans • hijab scarf |
| Created | 28 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hijab |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 15:21 | 8,128 | -3 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:50 | 8,131 | -11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:58 | 8,142 | +2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:21 | 8,140 | -18 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 8,158 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:48 | 8,160 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:00 | 8,158 | +4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:45 | 8,154 | -10 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:45 | 8,164 | +3 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 22:14 | 8,161 | -6 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 8,167 | -7 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 8,174 | -13 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 8,187 | +3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 8,184 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:35 | 8,189 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 8,201 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 8,199 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 8,213 | +11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 8,202 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 8,213 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 45 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
531 reactions across 38 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 271 | 51.0% | |
| 🥰 | 85 | 16.0% | |
| 👏 | 41 | 7.72% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 6.59% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 5.46% | |
| 🕊 | 12 | 2.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 1.51% | |
| 🤨 | 8 | 1.51% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 0.942% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.565% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.377% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.377% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.377% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.188% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 590 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
So Simple vs. Much Better 🪄✨ Credit: ratuanditya on Instagram #hijab #outfit #funny #style 🤎 @HiJAB
❤65🥰12👏6🔥5❤🔥1
multiple is allowed
The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤10👍4🔥3
Which ones are the outfits that you like? #hijab #outfit #fashion #style 🤎 @HiJAB
❤7🥰3👏1
Don't look at the camera 😋📸 Credit: dianarestul on Instagram #hijab #outfit #funny #style 🤎 @HiJAB
❤10😁6🥰4👏2🔥1
Posted without readable text
👍4😍1
Which ones are the outfits that you like? #hijab #outfit #fashion #style 🤎 @HiJAB
❤8🥰2👍1👏1
Happy 13th Birthday, Telegram ♥️✨ — 13 years of innovation, connection, and bringing the world closer. Here’s to the future. 🤎 @HiJAB
❤7❤🔥3👏3🥰1
✨😻 Credit: ayaa.saleh1 on Instagram #hijab #outfit #fashion #style 🤎 @HiJAB
❤25🥰5❤🔥2😁2👍1🔥1🕊1🤔1
Posted without readable text
👏5❤2🔥2
Which country do you like the most?! 🫦💄 #hijab #outfit #fashion #style 🤎 @HiJAB
❤6👏2👍1
Posted without readable text
👏3❤2👍1
Which ones are the outfits that you like? #hijab #outfit #fashion #style 🤎 @HiJAB
🥰5🤨4❤1❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @hijab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
multiple is allowed
The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Do you like this color combination?
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Tick the most beautiful
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What color?
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The choice is with you
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
If it is difficult to choose, you can choose several options
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hijab | حجاب | Fashion | Style | Outfit | Islam | Hejab” (@hijab), 8,128 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hijab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.