Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ••HighPriestess313••

Channel

••HighPriestess313••

@highpristess313

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,393subscribers

+533 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002501142048
TypeChannel
Username@highpristess313
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/highpristess313

Growth

6,8537,4217,13714 August 2026 — 6,860 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,853 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,261 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,404 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,421 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,417 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,393 subscribers7,39314 August 202630 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 16 days, net +533. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,768–7,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 21:487,393-24
27 Aug 2026, 20:147,417-4
25 Aug 2026, 05:437,421+17
22 Aug 2026, 10:147,404+143
18 Aug 2026, 17:537,261+408
16 Aug 2026, 03:056,853-7
14 Aug 2026, 21:166,860first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.9%
avg views ÷ 7,393 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,770
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held25 (8 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total94,160
Reactions total1,054
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,054 reactions across 25 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
81176.9%
💋656.17%
🔥504.74%
🕊272.56%
💘262.47%
💅232.18%
❤‍🔥191.80%
🙏70.664%
😍60.569%
👍50.474%
🥰50.474%
😁40.38%
😭30.285%
🍓10.095%
👌10.095%
👏10.095%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,054reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈1,780 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

29🔥2🍓1💘1

20 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,790 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026

سلاممم من تازه عضو چنلتون شدم خیلی وایب خوبی میده 🍓😆 برای پازکسازی تا کی انجام بدیم دوماه یک ماه؟

31🔥3

20 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,820 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026

از اونجایی که خیلی وقته صحبت نکردیم هرسوالی هست بیاید بپرسید صحبت کنیم 😂💋 @BlueflameAnorabot

💅2310🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈1,810 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

32🔥3👍1

20 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,840 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026

دخترررر غزلل چنلتو گذاشته بود داخل چنلش و گفت باهات کوچینگ کودک درون و انرژی زنانه داره و کلی تعریف کرد ازتتت از وقتی چنلتو گذاشت مدام دارم تو چنلت میگردم و عاشقت شدم ولی گیج شدمممم🥹😂 راهنمایی کن تروخدا خدماتت چیه دقیق چیکارمیکنی هزینش چطوری هست چون همین که غزل ازت تعریف کرد تو چنلش یعنی خیلی کارت عالیههه برا ماهایی که جدید اومدیم یکم از خودت بگوو💋💋🥲

29👍4🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC≈4,040 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026

برای خورشید گرفتگی امشب از ساعت ۸:۳۰ تا ساعت ۱۲ شب که انرژیاش فعال میشه به وقت تهران . این مدیتیشن رو بهتون پیشنهاد میکنم🤍

39🥰3😭3

12 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC≈3,810 views43 reactionsread 28 August 2026

آنورا جون همه دارن از خورشید گرفتگی حرف میزنن و میگن مدیتیشن انجام بدین کدوم مدیت مناسبه برای امشب ؟ من معتاد مدیتیشنات شدم اینقدر که زندگیم داره عالی میره جلو و همشون عالین میخام امشب بیشتر از فرصت استفاده کنم 😂🩷

🔥338🥰2

8 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC≈4,470 views63 reactionsread 28 August 2026

عشقین همتون سپاسگذارم بابت وجودتون و انرژی ای که میدین ولی من پل هستم که صرفا با انرژی این پورتال باید این حرفارو میزدم 🫠💋

55💋5🔥3

8 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC≈4,310 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

انورا میزان عشق من و دوستم به تو💆🏼‍♀️🌸🍷

🕊23💋1310😍6👌1

8 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC≈3,500 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026

عشقم همه ی ویس ها رو گوش دادم خیلیم بهم برخورد ولی تلنگر خوبی بود مرسیییی 😫😂💗

💘219😁4

8 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC≈4,850 views44 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

35💋4❤‍🔥2💘2🙏1

8 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC≈4,730 views40 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

33💋4💘2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @highpristess313. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 52,243 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“••HighPriestess313••” (@highpristess313), 7,393 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/highpristess313.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.