Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AI Workflows & Visuals 👾

Channel

AI Workflows & Visuals 👾

@hi_rufa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

326subscribers

+63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001947228715
TypeChannel
Username@hi_rufa
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hi_rufa

Growth

263326294.57 August 2026 — 263 subscribers8 August 2026 — 263 subscribers16 August 2026 — 284 subscribers24 August 2026 — 283 subscribers30 August 2026 — 326 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 254–335 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 08:29326+43
24 Aug 2026, 06:38283-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:05284+21
8 Aug 2026, 09:03263no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:53263first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 326 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
93.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held12 (8 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total78
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

612 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14724.0%
👍14523.7%
🔥11418.6%
🥰8013.1%
👏6310.3%
🙈284.58%
💯111.80%
🤪81.31%
💅60.98%
🆒40.654%
😎40.654%
🌚20.327%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 612reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 12 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hi_rufa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC78 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Краткий и ироничный разбор реальной истории баварских иллюминатов. Бавария, 1776. Ночь в лесу у костра 🔥. Адам Вейсгаупт, уставший от власти церкви, создал клуб «Совершенствующиеся». Их цели: Лезли в масонские ложи и переманивали мажоров • Читали запрещёнку • Мечтали отменить монархию и научить крестьян геометрии Пик: ~2000 интеллектуалов. Никакого мирового правительства. Конец (1785): Баварский курфюрст запретил

🔥22🥰21👍18👏7🤪5

29 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC111 views70 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Так, решила сделать секретный разбор теории заговора про иллюминатов. Уже накидываю варианты: короткие факты, формат «история vs миф» и самые сочные моменты. Вчера разбирала свой канал — вскрыли несколько слабых мест. Было полезно и по делу. Поэтому в ближайшее время будут изменения. Не пугайтесь, если канал начнёт преображаться (в лучшую сторону?) Порядок наведу не только в Телеге, но и во всех остальных соцсетя

26👍21🔥18🥰3💅2

27 Jul 2026, 19:41 UTC107 views75 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, сходила на «Зловещие мертвецы: Пекло». Актёрский состав незвёздный — и в этом огромный плюс. Никто не отвлекает лицом. Особенно вывезла Сухейла Якуб в роли Элис. Её трансформация из разбитой горем девушки в настоящую машину по уничтожению получилась очень убедительной, немного напомнило Грейс из Resident Evil (да я переиграла в резидент). Картинка сочная, ракурсы интересные, атмосфера — 10/10. Жестокость ощ

👍21🔥21🥰217👏5

27 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC93 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас тестирую Grok — и всё сильнее кажется что переходить буду туда. Есть в этом что-то грустно-ироничное: когда дают в руки инструменты, которые умеют почти всё, а потом проходит время, в нейронку закручивают болты и винтики и объясняют в правилах и часовых видео чего именно она делать не будет. Неа, это конечно правильно. Однако, каждая нейронка — это компромисс между «вау, я могу создать что угодно» и «ой, а в

21👍18🔥17👏6🤪3

27 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC88 views73 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тестирую кота. Grok — чуть реалистичнее и детальнее. Второе — Nano Banana с текстом #Grok #NanoBanana #AIArt #Cat #Test

24👍20🔥18👏7🆒4

26 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC85 views18 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мне кажется, визуальный язык очень недооценён. Ща будет моя любимая рубрика - аниме и игры. Азиатская анимация в этом смысле исключение: с визуальным языком и местным колоритом там всё в порядке, в отличие от многих других авторов, которые у неё же вдохновляются. Я как фанат игр и аниме вижу это у Sans/Megalovania в фанарте — синее пламя вместо глазницы, спокойное лицо, никакой ярости. У Black Rock Shooter тот же п

👍4🔥4😎4👏3🥰3

25 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC81 views57 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вывод после пары месяцев практики. Как есть, без розовых соплей. Ваш продукт может быть лучшим, но выбирают только то, что показали лучше всех. Внутри может быть что угодно — гениальное, честное, продуманное. Снаружи считывается только подача. Рынок сравнивает не продукты, а их подачу. Саму презентацию продукта. Путаете это — проиграли, просто пока не в курсе. Можно быть правым — и невидимым. 🌑 #ProductMarketing

🙈21👍14🔥12👏5🥰5

15 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC118 views38 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это пока не то, что я на самом деле хочу показать. Если по чесноку — смотря на эту работу понимаю: не откликается. Для меня это выглядит примитивно. Не мой уровень. Не то, что я вижу у себя в голове. Но вот в чём загвоздка: чтобы поймать свой ритм, нащупать свой стиль — нужно пройти через тонну работ, которые тебе самой не нравятся. Таков уж путь. Чем больше делаешь — тем ближе к тому результату, к которому хочешь

👍1413🥰5👏4🔥2

13 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC89 views16 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Так же были вот такие черновые варианты, пробные.

6👍5🥰3👏2

13 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC89 views56 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Молчала, состояние было не то, писать не хотелось. Без клятв на будущее и требований к себе — по вдохновению, приступам продуктивности или проектам. Один из них: сюрприз — чудный скраб. Ролик внизу, максимально простой, без цели на идеальный результат — это скорее опыт. Будем делать побольше и не ждать, пока всё станет идеально. Главное — просто делать. Продолжать, но делать. Кря, отмечу на всякий случай состав с

22🥰13👍10👏7💅4

8 Jun 2026, 09:37 UTC149 views42 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

15💯11👏10🥰4🌚2

8 Jun 2026, 09:37 UTC148 views29 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Зацените какой я мультик сделала для друга. Идея его, визуал и слитые токены генераций в унитаз мои)

13👏7🙈7🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @hi_rufa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI Workflows & Visuals 👾” (@hi_rufa), 326 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hi_rufa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.