Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙛𝙛 & ️мысли о прошлом. 🌀

Channel

𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙛𝙛 & ️мысли о прошлом. 🌀

@hholldr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

16subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002210362975
TypeChannel
Username@hholldr
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 15 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hholldr

Growth

1614 Aug 2026, 07:18 — 16 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 16:48 — 16 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 07:1814 Aug 2026, 16:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15–17 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:4816no change
14 Aug 2026, 07:1816first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

213 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51975314632511450665827.2%
🕊4822.5%
custom 51999054892441389694420.7%
custom 54248001859999688833817.8%
custom 53572906874505915622511.7%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2024 to 18 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2024, 14:59 UTC346 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

напомню про переезд –

🕊1

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

17 Aug 2024, 19:18 UTC356 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

вот это точно самое импульсивное решение

🕊1

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

17 Aug 2024, 19:18 UTC363 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026

мне как-то не очень комфортно на канале. когда я переезжала, то мне все безумно нравится, но сейчас.. не знаю, кажется я все испортила спустя время. есть желание не зацикливаться на одном марвеле и делать контент по другим фандомам (но марвел будет в большинстве все таки), здесь будто сделать этого не могу. мысль, что я могу лучше. буду рада всем, кто останется со мной. в этот раз так же предупреждать не стану (про

🕊5

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

17 Aug 2024, 17:19 UTC169 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳🧳⬜ 🧳🧳🧳 :: 𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙛𝙛 & мысли о прошлом

🕊3

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

17 Aug 2024, 17:15 UTC152 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @nanavaiiPhoto

#art

custom 54248001859999688831

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

17 Aug 2024, 07:19 UTC105 viewsread 14 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

17 Aug 2024, 07:19 UTC175 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

▫️▫️—он мой друг. ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️—им был и я. всегда на стороне тони. до сих пор не могу понять, как стив мог бросить тони в сибири, так еще и со сломанным костюмом. #edit

custom 51975314632511450669custom 51999054892441389697custom 53572906874505915625🕊4custom 54248001859999688833

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

16 Aug 2024, 16:49 UTC141 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026

пять до 80, ну емае, давайте наконец добьем это число, а я в ответ результаты на инткрактив (прошу прощения, эээ, уже месяц да прошел, может ху с ним и новый вообще начать)

custom 542480018599996888310🕊7custom 51975314632511450665custom 51999054892441389691

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

16 Aug 2024, 16:31 UTC105 views20 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

спроси у друзей кто ты по вайбу

custom 51999054892441389698custom 51975314632511450665custom 54248001859999688835🕊2

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

16 Aug 2024, 15:21 UTC97 views13 reactionsread 14 August 2026

можно реакции только на пост, а песню не трогать?😗

custom 51975314632511450668custom 51999054892441389694custom 54248001859999688831

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

16 Aug 2024, 15:21 UTC100 viewsread 14 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

16 Aug 2024, 15:21 UTC173 views43 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

can't you hear me? ▫️▫️▫️▫️I'm not coming home.. do you understand? I've change my plans.

custom 519753146325114506615custom 542480018599996888310custom 51999054892441389698🕊5custom 53572906874505915625

Signed ghost girl. (billie's version) #романоджерснавеки

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hholldr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,068,274 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙛𝙛 & ️мысли о прошлом. 🌀” (@hholldr), 16 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hholldr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.