Channel
@hhjnfdhjnnhh
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19,960subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1004295822398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hhjnfdhjnnhh |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hhjnfdhjnnhh |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
4.8 average views per post against 19,960 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.024%. Across the 1,997 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,612 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.80% and 11.5%, with a median of 4.93%.
| Window | 30 days (5 October 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 13 of 20 published in the window (13 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 62 |
| Mature posts only | 0.025% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 19,960 measured 3 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:zho · 1,997 channels · p10 0.52% · p25 1.80% · p50 4.93% · p75 11.5% · p90 25.4% |
| Position in cohort | 0.852th percentile · 1/200 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 4 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:28 | 19,960 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:22 | 19,960 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 October 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 62 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 05:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
新系统商户代充接单教程🥇🀄️😖⚡️ 系统接收到帐号订单收录后正常下发订单😀🀄️😖 有问题咨询客服😀 @NG28P320 😀支付宝口令😀 纯博彩盘口线上供料 ↓24小时自助下单↓ 自助下单地址：http://h5izy3659.top/ 24小时备用链接 ： h5yy320.top/ ❕如打不开平台链接复制到浏览器打开 ❕如支付风控可退回订单页面重新发起支付或选其他支付通道进行支付❕ 😀双向客户：@NG3329bot
新系统商户代充接单教程🥇🀄️😖⚡️ 系统接收到帐号订单收录后正常下发订单😀🀄️😖 有问题咨询客服😀 @NG28P320 😀支付宝口令😀 纯博彩盘口线上供料 ↓24小时自助下单↓ 自助下单地址：http://h5izy3659.top/ 24小时备用链接 ： h5yy320.top/ ❕如打不开平台链接复制到浏览器打开 ❕如支付风控可退回订单页面重新发起支付或选其他支付通道进行支付❕ 😀双向客户：@NG3329bot
0押金/南宫博彩洗资口令通道 pinned Deleted message
新人小白订阅加入频道看视频教程下单 支付宝小额洗口令红包 平台为24小时自助下单 支付宝小额洗纯BC盘口线上供料 今日口令库存已更新 欢迎自助下单！ 做单口令网站：http://h5izy3659.top/ 24小时备用链接 ： h5yy320.top/ 在线客服问题：✈️@NG28P320 双向客服：✈️@NG3329bot
0押金/南宫博彩洗资口令通道 pinned Deleted message
新人小白订阅加入频道看视频教程下单 支付宝小额洗口令红包 平台为24小时自助下单 支付宝小额洗纯BC盘口线上供料 今日口令库存已更新 欢迎自助下单！ 做单口令网站：http://h5izy3659.top/ 24小时备用链接 ： h5yy320.top/ 在线客服问题：✈️@NG28P320 双向客服：✈️@NG3329bot
0押金/南宫博彩洗资口令通道 pinned Deleted message
用户反馈，关于支付宝风险问题 大家可以参考一下领取口令红包时间的间隔，每十分钟领取一次口令就非常的稳不会被频繁 ✅平台所有的支付方式都是各种生活缴费,游戏充值,合理规避大家的洗资风险，如遇到无法支付，风险提示，请根据指示操作或返回平台切换使用其他支付通道，所有通道都可正常来回切换使用，下发的都是支付宝口令 🥰🥰🥰
新人小白订阅加入频道看视频教程下单 支付宝小额洗口令红包 平台为24小时自助下单 支付宝小额洗纯BC盘口线上供料 今日口令库存已更新 欢迎自助下单！ 做单口令网站：http://h5izy3659.top/ 24小时备用链接 ： h5yy320.top/ 在线客服问题：✈️@NG28P320 双向客服：✈️@NG3329bot
0押金/南宫博彩洗资口令通道 pinned Deleted message
新人小白订阅加入频道看视频教程下单 支付宝小额洗口令红包 平台为24小时自助下单 支付宝小额洗纯BC盘口线上供料 今日口令库存已更新 欢迎自助下单！ 做单口令网站：http://h5izy3659.top/ 24小时备用链接 ： h5yy320.top/ 在线客服问题：✈️@NG28P320 双向客服：✈️@NG3329bot
口令料子已加码,平台一切正常,稳定运营！临近年关，并发用户多，平台有时库存不足提交订单匹配不到或显示风险交易属于正常,这种请重新提交或使用其他支付通道，所有通道下发的都是支付宝口令,合理规避无风险📱🤑📱
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hhjnfdhjnnhh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0押金/南宫博彩洗资口令通道” (@hhjnfdhjnnhh), 19,960 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hhjnfdhjnnhh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.