Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小芙全台外送Gleezy line2025357

Channel

小芙全台外送Gleezy line2025357

@hh7285

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,310subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002472725023
TypeChannel
Username@hh7285
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hh7285

Growth

1,2791,3101,294.57 August 2026 — 1,279 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,279 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,280 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,286 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,292 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,289 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,296 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,304 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,310 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,274–1,315 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 22:171,310+6
28 Aug 2026, 04:161,304+8
25 Aug 2026, 01:141,296+7
21 Aug 2026, 05:051,289-3
17 Aug 2026, 18:341,292+6
11 Aug 2026, 07:221,286+6
8 Aug 2026, 01:021,280+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:471,279no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:171,279first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.78%
avg views ÷ 1,310 subscribers
Avg views / post
115
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,150
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1565.2%
🥰834.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC93 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

嚕拉拉 163.53.G.26歲 漂亮又優質的少婦,老公常年國外工作 每晚只能靠著情趣用品 每晚都能 聽到她淫蕩又下流的喘息聲!! 🐰小芙の賴:2025357 🐰點擊文字私訊小芙 🐰:一鍵加入 🐰:私訊大G:line2025357 🐰營業時間13:00am~次日03:00am

3

7 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

媚兒 160cm/46kg/Dcup/21歲 超會挑逗的騷系妹妹,翹臀勾人 有點小S屬性,互動熱烈不害羞 敢玩敢放,適合喜歡刺激感的哥哥 🐰小芙の賴:2025357 🐰點擊文字私訊小芙 🐰:一鍵加入 🐰:私訊大G:line2025357 🐰營業時間13:00am~次日03:00am

1

7 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC71 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

小琉璃 152/40/B/19歲 小隻馬蘿莉型,身材迷你纖細 臉蛋稚嫩、眼神無辜,氣質特別幼齒 聲音奶甜,帶點害羞卻很好帶入氛圍 皮膚細嫩白皙,觸感滑順,嬌小玲瓏剛好一手掌握 超可愛的存在,讓人忍不住想寵愛 🐰小芙の賴:2025357 🐰點擊文字私訊小芙 🐰:一鍵加入 🐰:私訊大G:line2025357 🐰營業時間13:00am~次日03:00am

🥰21

7 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC74 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

蕊欣 166cm.52kg.Fcup.26歲 性感慾姐,是典型的情慾女王 性慾旺盛到不行! 她約會時會自備情趣按摩棒 需求極其旺盛,床上的叫床聲既大且淫蕩,讓人難以抗拒她的熱情! 🐰小芙の賴:2025357 🐰點擊文字私訊小芙 🐰:一鍵加入 🐰:私訊大G:line2025357 🐰營業時間13:00am~次日03:00am

1

7 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

娜拉 165.50.D.28歲(單身) 健身教練,身材緊實有曲線 床上姿勢任你挑戰,奶炮 🐰小芙の賴:2025357 🐰點擊文字私訊小芙 🐰:一鍵加入 🐰:私訊大G:line2025357 🐰營業時間13:00am~次日03:00am

1

7 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC85 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

火辣內衣模特兼職 :15k 露娜 167cm D+cup 24歲 網拍內衣小模 性感大奶妹 皮膚白皙粉嫩 可以配合親嘴哦 玩很大 很開放 大長腿 火辣身材主動熱情 床上功夫好淫蕩風騷型 🐰小芙の賴:2025357 🐰點擊文字私訊小芙 🐰:一鍵加入 🐰:私訊大G:line2025357 🐰營業時間13:00am~次日03:00am

4

6 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC328 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

熟客+1 #北部正妹~ #15k 有興趣的可以私密我~ https://t.me/tw77d38 身高:165 體重:53 罩杯:大E真奶!!! 年齡:23 服務過程: 一進門就先來個甜甜的擁抱,抱抱時還不忘挑逗一下弟弟,繳了水錢後,就一起去洗澡,洗澡時就開始猛烈的吹奏樂器,不得不說這口技真的一流,到了床上一樣繼續吹奏,不過我也沒閒着,肯定是要讓妹妹知道什麽叫狗喝水,妹妹走一陣演奏後,主動騎了上來,沒想到妹妹騎術也是很頂,整個過程中,妹妹給人的情緒價值很高,高潮不像是裝的,服務真的超滿意,一定會回沖!!

6 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC119 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#親自面試 小初|163cm|D罩杯|21歲 #超級推薦的一個學生妹妹 目前大二 就讀金融系 第一眼就是很可愛 很乾淨的類型 白白淨淨的臉蛋很好看 整體氣質很有學生妹的感覺 🐰小芙の賴:2025357 🐰點擊文字私訊小芙 🐰:一鍵加入 🐰:私訊大G:line2025357 🐰營業時間13:00am~次日03:00am

🥰32

6 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC104 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

雨菲 162cmD奶25歲 #機場客服 溫柔小女友 電力十足 🐰小芙の賴:2025357 🐰點擊文字私訊小芙 🐰:一鍵加入 🐰:私訊大G:line2025357 🐰營業時間13:00am~次日03:00am

🥰32

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @hh7285. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 62,218 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小芙全台外送Gleezy line2025357” (@hh7285), 1,310 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hh7285.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.