#狼友投稿 约的上门老师,上门了之后说就是快餐+100车费,直接说课表全都是广告跟实际一点关系都没有...... 人照完全没有关系,但是不给退货,不给钱就要站电梯间喊人 约的半个小时上门,实际上门等了一个小时,完全没有服务,5分钟不出手打,全程15分钟结束穿衣服走人 国庆节气死个人,果然还得是婊子无情 😭 投稿联系 @hefeishudong2_bot
❤2

Channel
@hfsdgshby
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,565subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003810099164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hfsdgshby |
| Description | 不分享 不介绍 纯转发狼友投稿 本人遵纪守法 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hfsdgshby |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 22:22 | 6,565 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 2 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (2 October 2026 – 4 October 2026) |
| Views total | 15,360 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2026 to 4 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#狼友投稿 约的上门老师,上门了之后说就是快餐+100车费,直接说课表全都是广告跟实际一点关系都没有...... 人照完全没有关系,但是不给退货,不给钱就要站电梯间喊人 约的半个小时上门,实际上门等了一个小时,完全没有服务,5分钟不出手打,全程15分钟结束穿衣服走人 国庆节气死个人,果然还得是婊子无情 😭 投稿联系 @hefeishudong2_bot
❤2
#狼友投稿 事情经过:我在所谓的合肥公开榜上找了这个叫苏苏的,因为比较晚了 谈好的1900上门夜。也提前支付宝口令红包给了她60车费。见到了之后 让我微信扫给她1900,完了就催我删支付记录,没想到吧 我付的银行卡的钱,银行app里面还有个记录,我就说怎么催我删这个。后面就做了一次,就叫我去洗澡 趁我洗澡的时候 穿着衣服偷偷溜掉了。整个事情经过就这样,1900一炮的逼,我还真是第一次见,公开榜上的人。现在后续是这个鸡 可能因为管理问了,又给我回信息了,开口就是:钱是不可能退的了 要陪我玩到底。兄弟们 这母狗有谁认识的?https://t.me/shanchazhuangyuan 这个鸡的频道 投稿联系 @hefeishudong2_bot
❤1
🎰 合肥万花筒88口令红包10.4第五弹 📮 参与条件: 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-说明手册及活动 🎫 加入-合肥树洞故事会 🎫 加入-合肥万花筒编年史 🎫 加入-合肥万花筒工兵署 🎫 加入-合肥万花筒车评区 🎫 加入-合肥万花筒老师出击榜 🎫 加入-合肥万花筒修车交流群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 10 条 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 88口令红包 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: https://t.me/addlist/pBb6Y8bmcm5kOWJh 点此链接一键订阅万花筒群聊频道 即可满足条件抽奖 🎊 满人开奖: 达到 150 人参与后立刻开奖 📅 自动开奖:(人数未满) 2026年11月03日 12时00分00秒
❤1
#狼友投稿 我是 @wudixiaopika 我实名投稿。 一直都是低调出击,从来没跟老师发生过争执,但是今天出击的老师让我忍无可忍。因为跟绮梦时间有些冲突,转头约了包河的夏天,也是ly们力推过,才想着去看看。到了那边,发现夏天老师根本不是ly们力推的那样,不给亲,也不给摸胸,这跟人形加热飞机杯有啥区别,想着开7张,应该服务会不很错,人应该也很挺好,谁知道下菜下的这么重,真是一次非常失败的出击。 投稿联系 @hefeishudong2_bot
合肥商k摸摸唱‖真空情趣游戏场🎤 合肥商k情趣真空游戏互动场💕 😃热门玩法节选: 🍾高山流水 |🍾冰火两亚天 | 鸳鸯戏水 |🍾七星瓢虫 |🍾唐伯虎点秋香玩法 洗面奶 💕不止有趣,更是贴身,挑逗,让人欲罢不能❤️🔥 😀🐉🥵😀🐉😀🐉🐉🐉 🩲中场黑灯环节。全程高能🌶 🩲沉浸式暗场互动,🍑黑灯劲舞开场, 🥵穹腰😉翻身,😘🥵对坐🥵贴靠一一性感身段近在思尺🔥 🥂每一步走位都在勾引神经, 🥂每一处接触都引煤荷尔蒙。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🫶真空睡衣黑丝吊带/沙发诱惑每日演员150+🎲 形象佳,配合度高🎈现场海选消费透明❤️专业靠谱🫶放心体验❤️ 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐 ✈️ 咨询TG:@tkw20 🤖 双向机器人:@ktv99666bot 💬 电话(微信):13162205993 🔗 频道;;@hefei3k #合肥商k #合肥 #合肥KTV
❤6
#狼友投稿 一觉睡醒就看到,所谓“别人辛辛苦苦养群”,可能是觉的万花筒搭建的不费吹灰之力,“别人花时间维护的老师”可能是觉得控评是天大的赏赐,“别人修路万花筒收过路费”可能是觉得万花筒的钱是大风刮来的,狼友的钱酷酷往万花筒塞,“所谓培养老师”可能是老师的服务都是别的群管理先行调教的?唯一认可你的是“真正牛逼的不是把别人的资源搬过来,而是没有现成资源给你搬的时候还能不能把这个平台撑起来”在只有你一个平台的时候,老师只能找你,莫非飞机也有新加坡一样的黄牌执照?亦或者觉得自己成为头部之后只想着捞钱? 万花筒再次承诺,此群以纯公益性质运营,所谓收赞助榜费原因是机器人太贵?你们的方丈一个月才多少u?不要再骗了ok? 要我把你们机器人的账单拿出来挂在这里才可以不骗人?收榜费就收榜费,不要义正严辞的说收的是群基本的运营开销。所谓收割流量,万花筒有何收费之处? 冠冕堂皇的说些驴头不对马嘴的笑话罢了。 王侯将相宁有种乎???????? http…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @hfsdgshby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“合肥树洞故事会” (@hfsdgshby), 6,565 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hfsdgshby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.