有空 开课了

Channel
小沫 萧山有课室🏠可上🚪
@hfhybnunn66
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004472265414 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hfhybnunn66 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hfhybnunn66 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 11:22 | 18 | no change |
| 9 Oct 2026, 10:47 | 18 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 5 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 483.3%
- avg views ÷ 18 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 87.0
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (5 September 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 435 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 10
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
♥️ CHASE | ♡ HANGZHOU 💌 0条车评,综合评分 好评 0% |人照 |服务 中评 0% |颜值 |态度 差评 0% |身材 |环境 艺名 : #小沫 地区 : #萧山区 数据 : 2005_165_50_D 价格 : #6P #12PP #26YE 服务 : #潮喷 #共浴 #可过夜 #可外出. #车震 #性玩具 #角色扮演 #调情 标签 : #御姐系 #健身瑜伽 #大胸 #长腿系 #蜜臀 #肤白 🌍 联系方式 : 点击获取小沫联系方式 约课备注"野寻推荐" ✉️ 评价老师 : 点击评价 气质美女 制服丝袜 配合度高 💌 作业评价 💌 工兵活动 💌 杭州交流 💌 会员制度
Photo, posted without a caption
宝子们,原来这个频道被炸了 频道 https://t.me/xingxing6806 避免宝子被误解 我用小号来联系 私信 @liaopz89 双向 @ziji_service_bot
宝子们 原来那个号被炸了频道 https://t.me/xingxing6806
https://t.me/hxhzyxb
杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://telegram.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】: #好评 【优势】很紧 水多 虽然御姐 但是很紧 口活较好 【不足】有点年纪 没有照片那么年轻 (服务系老师) 【出击时间】:8.14 【老师花名】:#小沫 @xiaoshabo68 【出击留名】:玛卡 【开课位置】:萧山 【修车水费】:工兵 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ② 69舔逼 没要 ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 ✅ 【人照评价】:(从人照相似度,气质穿搭等进行评价)本人比照片年纪大一点 但是也还可以 【身材评价】:(身高腿长皮肤、是否有纹身等进行评价)皮肤较白 【胸部评价】:(罩杯,软硬等进行评价)B 【鲍鱼评价】:(结合户形,毛量,水量,紧度评价)正常毛量 水多 很紧 比有的嫩妹紧 【服务评价】:(服务是否做全)全 【态度评价】:(过程有无机车,催、赶,有无罚站行为等)态度可以 【环境评…
https://t.me/hznmg23
杭州学生会:https://t.me/students_union 评分标准:6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】:#小沫 @xiaoshabo68 【出击留名】:擎天柱 【出击时间】:8月9日 【大概位置】:萧山 【修车水费】:工兵p 【高端服务】:有的打 ✅ 没有的打 ❎ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 六九 ✅ ③ 毒龙 ✅ 【人照相似】:人照9分 颜值圆脸 穿搭气质 【身高身材】:身高162 小纹身 腰腹几乎没赘肉 【胸器罩杯】:罩杯b+胸型,乳头粉颜色,皮肤偏白手感 【湿度紧度】:户型毛发,紧度湿度很合适 做爱反馈比较真实 【课室环境】:小区 停车方便,出入无门禁 【个人卫生】:无抽烟,有陪浴,有浴巾/漱口水/牙刷 【时间管理】:排课合理,无催客赶客,有情绪价值 【服务点评】:优点有毒龙 服务到位缺点,价格合理,值得二刷 【推荐程度】:9分 【流程细节】:看了老师的报告 竟然有毒龙…
https://t.me/hz_dx
探花楼(杭州最真实的出击交流群) 【探花时间】:2026-08-06 【老师艺名】:小沫 【探花留名】:专吃少妇 【人照打分】:8.5 【身材打分】:8.5 【服务打分】:9 【态度打分】:10 【环境打分】:10 【综合评分】:9.2 【体验详细】:看了萧山来了新老师,验证视频很符合自己的口味,就马上主动联系老师地址,乖乖,超级近,10分钟就到了,问了老师时间,直接CJ。见面老师穿着连衣包臀裙,身材尽显,凹凸有致,小小只的,主动递水递拖鞋,重点是真的超级白,窗边夕阳打在老师皮肤上,简直白的发光,属于走在路上肯定会回头看一眼的那种。老师共浴帮洗的非常仔细,全程不需要自己动手,会找话题,沟通顺畅不显尴尬。重点是老师的服务,很多都没有写在课表上的,老师会AB面服务,全身漫游,简单吸皮,还会做毒龙,你说是嫩妹吧,但她居然还和服务系搭点边,毕竟本狼是带着吃嫩妹三件套的预期来的,所以服务上面大超预期。老师的口活很润滑,口水多,就是深下去…
杭州探花楼,最真实的玩家交流群。 https://telegram.me/hz5hz
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @hfhybnunn66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@hz5hz · 55,2202 posts杭州嫩妹馆
@hznmg23 · 32,0692 posts小沫 萧山有课室🏠可上🚪
@xingxing6806 · 1,1852 posts野寻·北京作业评价
@chasebj_zypj · 11,0821 post野寻·杭州学生交流群
@chasehz_jlq · 30,7991 post野寻·杭州小喇叭
@chasehz_xlb · 7581 post野寻·杭州作业评价
@chasehz_zypj · 15,0051 post杭州学生会
@hangzhou_520 · 108,2881 post韩信杭州老师优选榜
@hxhzyxb · 16,3061 post杭州大学
@hz_dx · 60,4031 post杭州探花楼楼凤认证榜(新)
@ij2222 · 63,6681 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小沫 萧山有课室🏠可上🚪” (@hfhybnunn66), 18 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hfhybnunn66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.