3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,821–3,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 21:13
3,824
+2
11 Aug 2026, 04:28
3,822
+1
10 Aug 2026, 15:31
3,821
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 3,824 subscribers
Avg views / post
456
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.828%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (11 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
4,106
Reactions total
34
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
79
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
علاج السواد التصبغي والوعائي بمنتجات موجودة فعلاً❤🧖🏼♀️
للتصبغي فيتامين سي صباحاً وواقي شمس فوقه لأن الشمس تثبت اللون
ونياسيناميد ليلاً على المنطقة أو أزيلايك أسيد بتركيز منخفض وبحذر
للوعائي كريم عين فيه كافيين لأنه يضيق الأوعية مؤقتاً ويخفف الظهور
وكمادة باردة ١٠ دقايق صباحاً تعطي نفس التأثير مجاناً
نوم ٧ إلى ٨ ساعات وعلاج الحساسية والاحتقان لأنهما يزيدان اللون الأزرق
ولا تحكين عينك لأن الحك أكبر سبب للتصبغ حول الع
سواد تحت العين ثلاثة أنواع وكل نوع علاجه مختلف تماماً😍💕
الأول تصبغي ولونه بني وسببه وراثي أو حك مستمر أو شمس
الثاني وعائي ولونه أزرق أو بنفسجي وسببه عروق تبان من جلد رقيق
الثالث ظلي وسببه فراغ أو انتفاخ يسوي ظل ولونه يتغير حسب الإضاءة
الاختبار بسيط شدي الجلد برفق وأنتِ قدام المرآة
إذا اللون بقي فهو تصبغي وإذا خف فهو وعائي وإذا اختفى مع رفع الإضاءة من تحت فهو ظلي
تحديد النوع أهم من أي كريم تشترينه
تسريحات الشعر للمناسبات في هذه المرحلة تكون بسيطة وطبيعية🥰🌹
الكعكة المنخفضة المفككة مع خيوط أمامية ناعمة مناسبة للمناسبات الخاصة
شعر مفتوح بموجات خفيفة بالمكوى مع سبراي خفيف يبدو جميلاً في الصور
ضفيرة جانبية مع بعض الكيرلات الناعمة تسريحة شبابية وأنيقة
تجنبي التسريحات الثقيلة المعقدة لأن البسيط دائماً أجمل وأخف على الشعر
الاكسسوارات الصغيرة الناعمة كالربطات القماشية تضيف لمسة جميلة
متى يكون الغسيل اليومي مقبولاً لفترة مؤقتة🧖🏻♀️😍
لو كنتِ تمارسين رياضة يومية وتتعرقين بشكل كثيف
أو لو كنتِ في بيئة مغبرة جداً تلوث الشعر يومياً
في هذه الحالات استخدمي شامبو بدون سلفات وبدون كميات كبيرة
الغسيل الخفيف بشامبو لطيف أقل ضرراً من الغسيل القوي بشامبو مركز
لكن هذا حل مؤقت وليس نمطاً يومياً دائماً
غسيل الشعر مرتين في اليوم ليس طبيعياً ويسبب مشاكل تدريجية🧖🏻♀️👩🏻🦰
فروة الرأس تحتوي على زيوت طبيعية تحمي الشعر وتغذي الجذور
الغسيل المتكرر يسلب هذه الزيوت ويجفف فروة الرأس
الفروة المجففة تعوض بإنتاج زيت أكثر مما يجعل الشعر يتشحم أسرع
وتدخلين في دوامة الشعر الدهني والغسيل الزائد بدون توقف
مرة أو مرتين بالأسبوع كافيتان للشعر العادي
﹏﹏﹏💄﹏﹏﹏
قناتي الجديدة لكل عشاق المكياج والجمال ✨
اشتركي من هنا 👇
🔗 https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBKV3b1Hspoj6Oih41i
﹏﹏﹏💄﹏﹏﹏
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hfdyg7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
وصفات جمالك قرة عينى 💇 @quratainyyy · 164,588 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
تنسيقات ✨ مكياج ✨ تعليم ✨ ماسكات 369 @princess_19990 · 287,887 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
صحة ، جمال ، صحتي ، عناية 🍏 @Sehetty · 130,406 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وصفات ✨عناية البشرة✨ماسكات✨تجميل 💅” (@hfdyg7), 3,824 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hfdyg7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.