Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📚«کتابخوانه»ی هزارخُم | «کتابخوانه»ی هزارخُم

Channel

📚«کتابخوانه»ی هزارخُم | «کتابخوانه»ی هزارخُم

@hezar_khom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

18,174subscribers

+5,509 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002446348048
TypeChannel
Username@hezar_khom
Descriptionشمس می‌گفت: «هزار خُمِ خَمر آن نکند که کلام رب العالمین کند» مقالات شمس، صفحه ۹۱ 📚 «کتابخوانه»ی هزارخُم | کارگاهی برای خوانشِ تحلیلی آثار ادبی و هنری 🎯 نقد، تحلیل و واکاویِ ساختاریِ متون 👥 همراه با استادان، دانشجویان و علاقمندانِ ادبیات و هنر.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hezar_khom

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,65618,17415,4157 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net +5,509. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,828–19,002 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 20:2618,174+177
9 Nov 2026, 23:1917,997-7
8 Nov 2026, 13:1518,004+83
7 Nov 2026, 04:3017,921-1
6 Nov 2026, 06:3917,922+45
5 Nov 2026, 07:4717,877+95
4 Nov 2026, 06:4617,782+135
3 Nov 2026, 08:3917,647+12
2 Nov 2026, 06:0817,635+28
1 Nov 2026, 06:5417,607+60
31 Oct 2026, 04:2917,547-16
30 Oct 2026, 05:5917,563+32
29 Oct 2026, 08:1717,531+110
28 Oct 2026, 09:4017,421+205
27 Oct 2026, 11:2817,216-12
26 Oct 2026, 11:5517,228-23
25 Oct 2026, 15:1217,251+80
24 Oct 2026, 17:3617,171-6
23 Oct 2026, 19:4517,177-7
22 Oct 2026, 18:3917,184first reading

Engagement

221 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.61%
avg views ÷ 18,174 subscribers
Avg views / post
838
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 221 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held221 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total50,290
Reactions total674
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,760
Videos
≈1,840
Links
≈8,630

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15h 26m
Average length
13m 26s

Measured directly from 69 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,459 reactions across 217 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,85475.4%
👍25410.3%
🙏1496.06%
👏1415.73%
💔341.38%
🕊190.773%
🤝80.325%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 217 of the 221 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,459 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 221 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 43 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (71.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 06:51 UTC589 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

خون‌ریزی و نَنْدیشی، عیّار چنین خوش‌تر دل دزدی و نگْریزی، طرّار چنین خوش‌تر زآن غمزه‌ی دودافکن، آتش فکنی در من هم دل شکنی هم تن، دلدار چنین خوش‌تر هر روز به هشیاری نونو دلم آزاری مست آیی و عذر آری، آزار چنین خوش‌تر نوریّ و نهان از من، حوریّ و رَمان از من بوس از تو و جان از من، بازار چنین خوش‌تر انصافِ غمت دادم، کز بهرِ غمت زادم غم می‌خورم و شادم، غم‌خوار چنین خوش‌تر الحق جگرم خوردی، خون‌ریزِ دلم کردی موئیم نیازر…

❤10

13 Nov 2026, 20:03 UTC142 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @tabadolbikaran

🖥 این فولدر رو به تلگرامتون اضافه کنید و دیگه دنبال روانشناس، فیلم آموزشی، کتاب،فیلتر شکن و جزوه که هر روز بهش نیاز داری نگرد!🔽🙏🏻🌹 https://t.me/addlist/XAl0IzOqKrs3N2Jk زمان ⏳️ محدوده زودتر عضو بشید

🙏3👍2❤1

13 Nov 2026, 18:31 UTC211 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @tabadolbikaran

📌برترین کانالهای Vip درتلگرام 👈🏻 ادبیات 👉🏻 👈🏻 قانون جذب 👉🏻 👈🏻 آموزش زبان👉🏻 👈🏻علمی👉🏻 👈🏻 موسیقی👉🏻 👈🏻 حقوقی 👉🏻 👈🏻 روانشناسی 👉🏻 👈🏻 درمانی 👉🏻 👈🏻موفقیت👉🏻 پیشنهاد ویژه امشب😍👇🏻 📖 نجواهای کاغذی ☂مسیرموفقیت‌راباماطی‌کنید☂

👍3❤1🙏1

12 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC951 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

داروگ خشک آمد کشتگاه من در جوار کشت همسایه. گر چه می‌گویند: «می‌گریند روی ساحل نزدیک سوگواران در میان سوگواران.» قاصد روزان ابری، داروگ! کی می‌رسد باران؟ بر بساطی که بساطی نیست در درون کومه‌ی تاریک من که ذرّه‌ای با آن نشاطی نیست و جدار دنده‌های نی به دیوار اطاقم دارد از خشکیش می‌ترکد ـــ چون دل یاران که در هجران یاران ـــ قاصد روزان ابری، داروگ! کی می‌رسد باران؟ #نیما‌یوشیج؛ مجموعه‌ی کامل اشعار فارسی و طبری، گردآ…

❤7👍1🕊1🙏1

12 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC710 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

3⃣⤴️ 📝ابهام ساختاری و خواننده‌ی فعال: نظریه‌ی دریافت و بوطیقای پدیدارشناختی در شعر نیما یوشیج اختصاصی‌کتابخوانه‌ی_هزارخم ✍ادمین #زهرا_م تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی از دیدگاه ماتریالیسم فرهنگی، مقاومت و براندازی گفتمان غالب در نیما را نشان می‌دهد؛ بدین ترتیب که نوآوری نیما کنشی فرهنگی‌سیاسی در برابر اقتدار گفتمان کلاسیک است. محض نمونه، در ادبیات تطبیقی، نیما و بدر شاکر السیاب، هر دو نوگرا، طبیعت‌گرا و رمزگرا هستند؛ نیما …

❤8🙏2👏1

12 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC609 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026

2⃣⤵️ 📝ابهام ساختاری و خواننده‌ی فعال: نظریه‌ی دریافت و بوطیقای پدیدارشناختی در شعر نیما یوشیج اختصاصی‌کتابخوانه‌ی_هزارخم ✍ادمین #زهرا_م در تحلیل متن، «افسانه» فقط تجربه‌ای فرمی نیست، زمینه‌ی اجتماعی دارد که نهضت مشروطه، نهضت جنگل و روی کار آمدن رضاخان در آن بازتاب می‌یابد. ساختار گفتگوی دوطرفه، حذف «متکلم وحده» و افزودن شخصیت‌های شعری، نوآوری صوری آن است، هرچند زبان افسانه در صرف و نحو ایرادهای بیشتری دارد. «ققن…

❤7🙏2👏1

12 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC709 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

1⃣⤵️ 📝ابهام ساختاری و خواننده‌ی فعال: نظریه‌ی دریافت و بوطیقای پدیدارشناختی در شعر نیما یوشیج اختصاصی‌کتابخوانه‌ی_هزارخم ✍ادمین #زهرا_م سبک نیما، جوهری ثابت نیست، مسیری تحولی است که از فرم نمایشی‌گفتگومحورِ «افسانه» به روایت نمادین «ققنوس» و سپس به پاره‌روایت‌های ابهام‌محورِ «ری را» و «خانه‌ام ابری‌ست» پیش می‌رود. بر همین اساس و با تحلیل چهار شعر از چهار دوره‌ی متفاوت و بررسی تطبیقی نظریه‌ی ادبی نیما و زمینه‌ی نها…

❤8🙏2👏1

12 Nov 2026, 17:42 UTC772 views9 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📝ابهام ساختاری و خواننده‌ی فعال: نظریه‌ی دریافت و بوطیقای پدیدارشناختی در شعر نیما یوشیج اختصاصی‌کتابخوانه‌ی_هزارخم ✍ادمین #زهرا_م https://t.me/hezar_khom

❤6👍1👏1🙏1

11 Nov 2026, 18:25 UTC877 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

"در کالبد داستایفسکی، انسانی بزرگتر از آن آدم خودپرست ضعیف النفس آتشی مزاج مغرور، که نویسندگانِ شرح حالِ او تصویر می‌کنند، وجود داشت: در وجود او مردی زندگی می‌کرد که می‌توانست «آلیوشا» را بیافریند، آفریده ای که شاید در تمامی رمان‌های جهان، جذاب‌تر و شیرین‌تر و نجیب‌تر و مهربان‌تر از او نیامده باشد. در کالبد داستایفسکی، انسانی زندگی می‌کرد که می‌توانست “پدر زوسیما” را خلق کند، مردی که شبیه اولیاء است" "سامرست موآم" …

❤9👍1

11 Nov 2026, 18:23 UTC857 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

‌ آدم می‌تواند در هر زنی چیزی فوق‌العاده جالب پیدا کند. لعنت به من، اگر به آن‌چه هر زنی دارد و دیگر زن‌ها ندارند پی نبرم. فقط باید آدم بداند چه طوری آن را پیدا کند، رازش در همین است! این یک استعدادِ ذاتی است! برای من هیچ‌وقت زنِ زشت وجود نداشته!.فقط همین موضوع زن بودن خودش نیمی از همه چیز است. ولی چگونه می‌توانید به آن پی ببرید؟ حتی در پیردخترها هم آدم گاهی چیزهایی می‌یابد که انگشت به دهان می‌ماند! مخصوصا از این بابت…

❤9👍3

11 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC913 views13 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

🔷داستایوفسکی، زندگینامه و معرفی آثارش 🔹زندگی پر فراز و نشیب داستایوفسکی 🔹معرفی برخی از مهم‌ترین آثار او مانند "جنایت و مکافات"، "برادران کارامازوف"، "ابله"، و "شیاطین" 🔹تحلیل سبک نویسندگی و تکنیک‌های روایتی او 🔹تأثیرات داستایوفسکی بر روانشناسی و فیلسوفانی مانند زیگموند فروید و فریدریش نیچه 🔹بررسی مضامین فلسفی و اخلاقی در آثار او با ما همراه باشید تا بیشتر با این نویسنده بزرگ و نقش او در تاریخ اندیشه و هنر آشنا شویم…

❤13

11 Nov 2026, 10:49 UTC979 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

👤فئودور میخائیلوویچ داستایفسکی ‌‏🇷🇺ملیت روسی (۱۸۲۱ مسکو، ۱۸۸۱ سن‌پترزبورگ) رمان‌نویس و روان‌کاوِ روح انسان ♦️فهرست معرفی: 🔸معرفی نویسنده 🔸داستایفسکی(ویدئواختصاصی‌هزارخم) 🔸زندگی‌نامه 🔸انسان‌موجودعجیبی‌است 🔸معرفی‌آثارمهم‌داستایفسکی 🔸درس‌هایی‌ازداستایفسکی 🔸چرابایدداستایفسکی‌خواند؟ 🔸ادبیات‌وداستایفسکی(ویدئو) 🔸داستایفسکی‌وسیاست 🔸برادران‌کارامازوف(کالکشن معرفی) 🔸مستندی‌ازخانه‌ی‌داستایفسکی(ویدئو) 🔸ابله 🔸تندیسی‌ازداستای…

❤11👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 221 posts we hold for @hezar_khom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hezar_khom edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 46 posts on @hezar_khom as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
15

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📚«کتابخوانه»ی هزارخُم | «کتابخوانه»ی هزارخُم” (@hezar_khom), 18,174 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hezar_khom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.