Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

deluluna !

@heydeluna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,226subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003096482455
TypeChannel
Username@heydeluna
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/heydeluna

Growth

2,1882,2422,2158 August 2026 — 2,193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,188 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,242 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,226 subscribers2,2268 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,180–2,250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:062,226-16
11 Aug 2026, 06:212,242+54
8 Aug 2026, 15:132,188-5
8 Aug 2026, 06:342,193first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.5%
avg views ÷ 2,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (20 February 202631 July 2026)
Views total4,240
Reactions total757
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,633 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52331840554947300123,40839.5%
custom 53102957995428678151,04612.1%
custom 53573083483561324776207.18%
custom 52337064008273352285866.79%
custom 54048280512026658095005.79%
custom 52358232441786409054975.76%
custom 52332416252363653723584.15%
custom 53978362481717101933293.81%
custom 52311977963290727031832.12%
custom 52201848774118773211691.96%
custom 52309882448747006501671.93%
custom 52336108120351848951601.85%
custom 53372672406789944971601.85%
custom 53978911550336207871001.16%
custom 5407088093058591111881.02%
custom 5199850406288571847710.822%
custom 5467921464378274456640.741%
custom 5307981692638606162490.568%
custom 5224399653373511810460.533%
custom 5221995498184920377240.278%
1 further kind80.093%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,633reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
394
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 20 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
62
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @heydeluna. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 February 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,330 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026

порог — 340 🌟

custom 539789115503362078739custom 539783624817171019324

31 Jul 2026, 21:29 UTC≈1,410 views430 reactions51 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[ 🎎 ]▫️#chan ▫️▫️▫️« the garden of cursed roses » — ` он демон, обречённый на вечную жизнь из-за проклятия, наложенного более века назад. но всё меняется, когда он встречает девушку, в которой узнаёт свою потерянную любовь part 1 — next ✍️ ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️by @heydeluna

custom 5397836248171710193305custom 546792146437827445664custom 539789115503362078761

30 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,500 views264 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[🌸]▫️#straykids — ` он холодный, но иногда ломается вторую часть читать у neyazero 🤩 буду благодарна любым взаимодействиям с работой

custom 5220184877411877321169custom 530798169263860616249custom 522439965337351181046

15 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈3,700 views368 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[🦷]▫️#straykids — ` он — сын маминой подруги вторую часть читать у поцелуй от малины 🤍 буду благодарна любым взаимодействиям с работой

custom 5357308348356132477246custom 533726724067899449765custom 523361081203518489557

10 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC≈3,730 views135 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

❕СПОЙЛЕР❕ фанфакт: если бы минхо сразу рассказал джисону, что джихён больна, он бы успел приехать к ней в больницу и увидеть её перед смертью

custom 535730834835613247785custom 533726724067899449727custom 523361081203518489523

9 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈3,830 views437 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[🤩]▫️#seungmin — ` переписка через заметки в инстаграме part 1 (the end)🔒 буду благодарна любым взаимодействиям с работой

custom 5357308348356132477289custom 523361081203518489580custom 533726724067899449768

5 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC≈4,670 views512 reactions53 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[👐]▫️#felix ▫️▫️▫️« fate doesn’t like us » — ` он — твой новый сосед, который стал смыслом твоей жизни. но у судьбы, кажется, совсем другие планы part 1 — part 2 — part 3 — part 4 — part 5 — part 6 — part 7 (the end)🔒 буду благодарна любым взаимодействиям с работой

custom 5233184055494730012374custom 523370640082733522864custom 523582324417864090561custom 523324162523636537213

15 Jun 2026, 23:47 UTC≈5,240 views520 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[👐]▫️#felix ▫️▫️▫️« fate doesn’t like us » — ` он — твой новый сосед, который стал смыслом твоей жизни. но у судьбы, кажется, совсем другие планы part 1 — part 2 — part 3 — part 4 — part 5 — part 6 — next ✍️ буду благодарна любым взаимодействиям с работой

custom 5233184055494730012390custom 523370640082733522863custom 523324162523636537259custom 52358232441786409058

14 Jun 2026, 13:14 UTC≈3,990 views58 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @byskarl1iPhoto

«я ведь писала тебе. я куда более неполноценный человек, чем ты можешь предположить. я больна куда сильнее, чем ты думаешь. и корни этой болезни очень глубоки. поэтому если ты сможешь пойти дальше — иди один. не жди меня. за меня не беспокойся. делай то, что тебе захочется. иначе я собью тебя с верного пути. только этого я ни за что не хочу.»

custom 523318405549473001244custom 523582324417864090510custom 52337064008273352284

24 May 2026, 15:50 UTC≈6,170 views597 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[👐]▫️#felix ▫️▫️▫️« fate doesn’t like us » — ` он — твой новый сосед, который стал смыслом твоей жизни. но у судьбы, кажется, совсем другие планы part 1 — part 2 — part 3 — part 4 — part 5 — next ✍️ буду благодарна любым взаимодействиям с работой

custom 5233184055494730012440custom 523370640082733522876custom 523582324417864090569custom 523324162523636537212

17 May 2026, 21:30 UTC≈5,830 views120 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

решила сделать отдельный канал, куда буду выкладывать всё творчество по моим работам ваши видео правда стали для меня чем-то особенным, поэтому захотелось собрать всё это в одном месте 🥺 ссылка: https://t.me/dluniversee

custom 523324162523636537267custom 523582324417864090526custom 523318405549473001223custom 52337064008273352284

17 May 2026, 16:25 UTC≈5,360 views130 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

нас целых две тысячи — это уже маленькая вселенная🥹 большое спасибо за то, что читаете мои работы, пишете комментарии, ставьте реакции и остаетесь со мной, несмотря на долгие отсутствия. благодаря вам я всё ещё продолжаю заниматься своим любимым делом и радую вас новыми аушками. люблю и ценю каждого!!❤️❤️ не знаю, чем заслужила вас 🥹

custom 523582324417864090578custom 523370640082733522827custom 523318405549473001225

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @heydeluna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 284,938 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“deluluna !” (@heydeluna), 2,226 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heydeluna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.