Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хекслет

Channel

Хекслет

@hexlet_ru

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,978subscribers

+107 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001101227600
TypeChannel
Username@hexlet_ru
DescriptionПрограммы обучения - https://ru.hexlet.io/courses Сообщество @hexletcommunity AI Клуб @hexletclub Поддержка @hexlet_help_bot
Created7 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hexlet_ru

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,8547,9787,9166 August 2026 — 7,871 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,871 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,867 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,869 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,862 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,854 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,862 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,867 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,880 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,881 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,898 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,894 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,903 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,904 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,912 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,903 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,919 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,936 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,938 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,945 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,935 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,946 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,945 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,958 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,976 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,978 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net +107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,835–7,997 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 10:597,978+2
6 Nov 2026, 00:007,976+18
2 Nov 2026, 17:367,958+13
31 Oct 2026, 01:067,945-1
27 Oct 2026, 16:407,946+11
24 Oct 2026, 15:287,935-10
21 Oct 2026, 09:207,945+7
17 Oct 2026, 21:317,938+2
15 Oct 2026, 03:377,936+17
11 Oct 2026, 15:157,919+16
4 Oct 2026, 23:177,903-9
26 Sept 2026, 01:187,912+8
17 Sept 2026, 00:007,904+1
12 Sept 2026, 18:577,903+9
8 Sept 2026, 21:587,894-4
3 Sept 2026, 10:277,898+17
30 Aug 2026, 18:487,881+1
28 Aug 2026, 02:547,880+13
25 Aug 2026, 10:587,867+5
22 Aug 2026, 13:357,862first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 7,978 subscribers
Avg views / post
951
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held60 (7 April 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total23,773
Reactions total183
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 14:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,210
Videos
≈46
Links
≈2,870

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

742 reactions across 54 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22830.7%
🔥20427.5%
👍19926.8%
🤡314.18%
👾283.77%
😁253.37%
💯192.56%
🎄50.674%
😴30.404%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 827 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (38.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC591 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Уже через несколько часов мы начинаем воркшоп: в 19:00 в прямом эфире пишем собственный MCP-сервер для работы с базой данных. Настроим фильтры и ограничения, дадим агенту выборочный доступ к базе и не позволим ему ломать и компрометировать проект. Напишем, проверим на реальной задаче. Сегодняшний вечер — неплохое время, чтобы попрактиковаться и поглубже разобраться в настройках MCP. Шаблон сервера останется у вас …

❤2🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC998 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Очередной взлом: думали, само сломалось, а оно не само. Вредоносы поломали российского хостинг-провайдера ESTT (e-Style Telecom), владельца дата-центра Tier III в Москве. Полегли «Вкусно — и точка», «Много лосося», Cofix, «Суши мастер», система iiko и РЭУ им. Плеханова. Про более мелкие проекты не пишут, но их должно быть много. Что произошло: 8 ноября из-за атаки упали сайты и приложения клиентов. Облачная инфрас…

👍4👾4🔥4❤1

9 Nov 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,020 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Бан-шоу продолжается. Теперь за пользователей взялась компания OpenAI: на блокировки аккаунтов ChatGPT жалуются пользователи по всему миру. Бэкап аккаунта не будет лишним. Под блокировку попали не только бесплатные профили, но и владельцы дорогих профессиональных тарифов Pro за $200 в месяц и командных аккаунтов Team. Автоматические модераторы блокируют учетные записи без предупреждения и без возможности оспорить р…

❤5👍5👾2

9 Nov 2026, 09:48 UTC873 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

В OpenSSH 10.6p2 нашли и закрыли удивительную уязвимость SSHole (CVE-2026-123158). Эта уязвимость позволяет любому желающему подключиться по SSH под логином пользователя, у которого заблокирован пароль. Зовём Валентиа Исипчука, нашего наставника курса «Вайб-кодинг на Claude Code»: Валентин, рассказывай, что там и почему! — Уязвимость касается систем, где стоит библиотека musl и нет подсистемы PAM. Для входа нужно з…

👾3🔥3👍2

8 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC822 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Воскресный сериал «Краш-календарь за октябрь и немножко за ноябрь», часть последняя. Восстание машин временно отменяется Смотрим, какова роль ИИ в этой лавине уязвимостей и взломов. Возможно, кто-то не признался, а кто-то честно не знал о роли ИИ в произошедшем, но вот данные, подтверждённые к настоящему моменту. Участие ИИ подтверждено в шести кейсах из двадцати трёх. Это не значит, что их всего шесть. Однако спис…

❤1👍1👾1🔥1

8 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC762 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Кстати, тут наша статья на Хабре о том, что Линус Торвальдс думает об этом вашем ИИ и его противниках набрала 106к+ просмотров Прочитайте что ли и вы тоже 🦊 https://habr.com/ru/companies/hexlet/articles/1103584/ Telegram | YouTube | AI Клуб | VK | X

🔥4👍3❤1

8 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC760 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Воскресный сериал «Краш-календарь за октябрь и немножко за ноябрь», часть третья. С открытым финалом, как теперь модно. Ждём в комменты ваши версии:: каково подтверждённое участие ИИ в этой лавине взломов и неприятных находок? В сериале — 23 кейса за период с 1 октября по 7 ноября. Третья серия: Двести пятьдесят шесть символов 1.11, взлом Росстата РФ Суть: хакеры подменили страницы сайта. Состояние: хакеры заявляют…

❤3👾2🔥2

8 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC694 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Продолжаем воскресный сериал «Краш-календарь за октябрь и немножко за ноябрь». Первая серия — где-то чуть выше в вашей ленте. Мы всё ещё принимаем версии: каково подтверждённое участие ИИ в этой лавине взломов и неприятных находок? Вторая серия: Чёрная среда 17.10, ошибка генерации ключей eMudhra Суть: приватные ключи восьми сертификатов оказались предсказуемыми числами (4, 56, 66, 115, 155, 156, 230, 237), это пр…

❤2👍2👾2🔥1

8 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC711 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Краш-календарь за октябрь и немножко за ноябрь 2026. Мы планировали небольшой пост об уязвимостях и взломах последнего месяца, но вместо этого получился мини-сериал из четырёх серий. Мы собрали 23 кейса, и это лишь самые громкие. В комментариях принимаем версии: каково подтверждённое участие ИИ в этой лавине взломов и неприятных находок? Первая серия: Пробуждение нулевого дня 1.10, уязвимость в FortiMail Суть: за…

❤5👾1🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC772 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

К опросу выше ⬆️

❤3🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 13:41 UTC829 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

Как вы добываете доступ к ИИ?

  1. плачУ посреднику и молюсь за аккаунт14%
  2. плАчу17%
  3. VPN, чужая карта, вера в лучшее38%
  4. поднял модель локально и сплю спокойно10%
  5. российские сервисы, и нормально8%
  6. китайские сервисы, и нормально30%
  7. пишу код сам, как завещали предки20%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍1

6 Nov 2026, 12:59 UTC942 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026

От прототипа до продакшна: как разрабатывать бизнес-продукты с помощью AI Нейросеть написала приложение за вечер. А через неделю его пришлось переписывать с нуля. Почему так происходит — и как превратить вайб-кодинг в реальный инструмент разработки? В этом выпуске Андрей Смирнов — руководитель по автоматизации и внедрению искусственного интеллекта в функции качества «Магнита», ведущий подкаста «Подлодка» и автор те…

❤5👍4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @hexlet_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hexlet_ru edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
3 November 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2026, 13:41 UTCAnonymous Poll162 voters

Как вы добываете доступ к ИИ?

  1. плачУ посреднику и молюсь за аккаунт14%
  2. плАчу17%
  3. VPN, чужая карта, вера в лучшее38%
  4. поднял модель локально и сплю спокойно10%
  5. российские сервисы, и нормально8%
  6. китайские сервисы, и нормально30%
  7. пишу код сам, как завещали предки20%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Stepik – онлайн-курсы
@stepik_courses · 28,865
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
GeekBrains
@geekbrains_ru · 24,507
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
Волгоград | События | Подслушано
@Volgograd_podslushal · 35,769
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хекслет” (@hexlet_ru), 7,978 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hexlet_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.