🦊 Diese kleinen Welpen sind in der Zwischenzeit wohl ausgewachsen - doch diesen Frühling haben sie uns ein paar wundervolle Momente beschert 😍🙏🏻 Etwa zehn Meter von uns entfernt, konnten wir im Mai den Fuchbau und seine Bewohner beobachten. Die kleinen Füchse zeigten sich selten - doch wenn, dann erforschten sie die Welt mit ganz viel Neugierde und Staunen. 😃 Diese Fotos sind für mich deshalb ganz besonders. 🥰 Fot…

Channel
☀️Herzensblicke☀️
@herzensblicke
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,026subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001603935906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @herzensblicke |
| Created | 13 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/herzensblicke |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 1,026 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 1,025 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 1,027 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 1,023 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 1,022 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 1,022 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.34%
- avg views ÷ 1,026 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 65.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (13 April 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 65 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Eine kleine Hörprobe ☺️
☀️🍀☀️ Nun ist es da - das Hörbuch von „Herzensblicke“ 🥰🌷😃 Über viele Monate hinweg hat Katrin Seewald die Geschichte von Delia und Ruth eingesprochen und so mit ganz viel Herzblut meinem Roman eine noch tiefere Ebene verliehen. 🙏🏻☺️ Entstanden ist ein tief berührendes Hörbuch mit der wundervollen Klaviermusik von Sabrina Ritz - zum Eintauchen, Verweilen und Geniessen 🥰 Das Hörbuch gibt es auf Spotify zu kaufen - od…
🦉 Schaut mal, was für ein Glück wir hatten! 😍Vier kleine Waldkäuze und Mama oder Papa - wobei sich das Elternteil nur ganz kurz blicken liess. Die Kleinen liessen sich jedoch gut beobachten - sofern man sie im Blättermeer entdeckt. 😍🦉🌿 Fotos: Marco Wigger und ich
🌱 Der Mai ist inzwischen mein Lieblingsmonat - überall blüht und zwitschert es. 😍 Hier ein paar kleine Einblicke der letzten Tage… 🌸🐝🌱 Fotos: Marco Wigger
🦉 Die Tage haben wir wieder unglaublich viel erlebt. Eine Begegnung davon war besonders magisch: Wir haben uns auf eine Bank unter eine Tanne gesetzt und eine Pause eingelegt. Auf einmal hörten wir über unseren Köpfen ein „huh“. Jemand rief ganz leise. 😃 Neugierig blickten wir uns um und entdeckten die Waldohreule gleich über uns. Sie war ganz toll zum Beobachten! 😍 Immer wieder rief das Eulenmännchen nach seiner Par…
🌱 Weil es draussen gerade grau ist, brauche ich ein paar Frühlingsaugenblicke der letzten Tage. 😍☀️🌷🙏🏻 Fotos: Marco Wigger
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @herzensblicke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,006,157 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☀️Herzensblicke☀️” (@herzensblicke), 1,026 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/herzensblicke.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.