Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Heritage | Telegram usernames

@heritage

3 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4,273subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001884008419
TypeChannel
Usernames@heritage @skins @thecrypto
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/heritage

Growth

4,2414,2734,2576 August 2026 — 4,245 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,245 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,245 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,244 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,241 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,241 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,248 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,251 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,250 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,257 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,266 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,273 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 7 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,236–4,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:334,273+7
11 Aug 2026, 23:524,266+9
10 Aug 2026, 03:554,257+7
9 Aug 2026, 08:214,250-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:424,251+3
7 Aug 2026, 06:204,248+7
6 Aug 2026, 13:454,241no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:104,241-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:404,244-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:064,245no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:464,245no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:044,245first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.0%
avg views ÷ 4,273 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held22 (3 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total26,115
Reactions total353
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

439 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳13129.8%
custom 57669339264298544996815.5%
custom 54561406740280194865813.2%
custom 5190568977666957657378.43%
custom 5472113318099427332347.74%
245.47%
custom 5447458260200214425163.64%
custom 5472248119942979457163.64%
😁163.64%
😱102.28%
custom 578960575311538400481.82%
custom 539569553768712323571.59%
😴40.911%
🕊30.683%
😡30.683%
custom 519301843187558727020.456%
🗿20.456%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 449reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 22 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @heritage. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC667 views86 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚘 Username @rollsroyce has been listed on Fragment for the first time Minimum bid — 75,000 💎 (~$104k). Fair price or too much? ⚡ — fair price 😳 — too much https://fragment.com/username/rollsroyce @heritage / @notifier

custom 545614067402801948652custom 547211331809942733234

6 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC712 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Are auctions dead? Today, the username @burger was listed for auction with a minimum bid of 10 $GRAM. 😬 However, it received no bids within 15 minutes and was removed from the auction. The username was previously sold for ~$13k. @heritage / @notifier

😁10🐳3🗿1custom 57669339264298544991

4 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC966 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🕊 Telegram continues to auction usernames that were previously unavailable The auction for @jerry has just concluded, with all proceeds sent to an address associated with Fragment. What makes this case notable is that the username was previously unavailable on the platform. 😈 This is not the first such case in recent months. Telegram has now made several exceptions by putting previously unavailable usernames up for

🕊3custom 57669339264298544992😱1custom 51905689776669576571

3 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,160 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏅 Top sales of the week. 20 most expensive: @polymarket 354,900 $GRAM @cole 66,666 $GRAM @monkey 26,686 $GRAM @wingram 20,000 $GRAM @pornhubbot 18,090 $GRAM @friend 17,777 $GRAM @pornhubbot 14,000 $GRAM @trxbot 13,888 $GRAM @okey 12,400 $GRAM @a999 10,000 $GRAM @coal 8888 $GRAM @drained 8390 $GRAM @castle 7777 $GRAM @nobu 7500 $GRAM @drained 7123 $GRAM @limb 6817 $GRAM @pace 6183 $GRAM @theproduct 12,000 $GRAM*⃣ @gr

🐳5

30 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,570 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 What will be the final price for @police? Choose reaction: 🗿 - 1k 💎 💅 - 3k 💎+ 🚨 - 5k 💎 + ⚡ - 10k 💎 + 🐳 - 20k 💎 + https://fragment.com/username/police @heritage #howmuch

🐳52custom 53956955376871232357custom 54561406740280194865🗿1

30 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,530 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🗑 Someone burned the 4-letter username @baem @baem was minted on July 22, with the buyer paying Fragment 5,310 $GRAM (~$8k). After the purchase, username was banned on Fragment. As a result, the owner listed it for 2,000 $GRAM, but no buyer was found within an hour, and the username was sent to a burn address. Update: It turned out that the owner was a scammer impersonating the well-known middleman @beam. @herita

😱9😁6custom 54474582602002144252custom 57669339264298544991

28 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,530 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5766933926429854499102🐳2

27 Jul 2026, 05:30 UTC≈1,520 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏅 Top sales of the week. 20 most expensive: @neon 15,000 $GRAM @insomnia 10,000 $GRAM @laoa 9015 $GRAM @sync 7986 $GRAM @niko 7777 $GRAM @chas 7450 $USDT @brown 7000 $GRAM @ddlg 6837 $GRAM @told 6655 $GRAM @outlaw 6534 $GRAM @burp 6360 $GRAM @okpa 5597 $GRAM @yaaa 5589 $GRAM @aiii 5589 $GRAM @xmas 5546 $GRAM @judge 5509 $GRAM @xxxm 5460 $GRAM @flqb 5446 $GRAM @gods 10,784 $GRAM*⃣ @mrkai 6000 $GRAM*⃣ *⃣ — This deal

🐳4

26 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,420 views24 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔮 Username @polymarket has just received a bid of 305,000 $GRAM (~$462k) at auction The previous known sale of the username took place nearly three years ago for 105 $GRAM (~$224). 🔨 The auction will remain open for another five days. https://fragment.com/username/polymarket @heritage

🐳145custom 57896057531153840043custom 54474582602002144252

25 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,450 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

👨‍💻 Introducing @notifier — a convenient assistant for trading and collecting Telegram usernames What the bot offers: 🔔 Short and clear alerts about bids, offers, sales, and other events, with quick-access buttons. #⃣ "Smart" alerts for new listings of dictionary words and other username categories. ⚙ Flexible settings that let you customize notifications to match your needs. 🔎 A tool for finding the contact det

custom 5766933926429854499126🐳6custom 54474582602002144251

25 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC≈1,360 views18 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💸 Pavel Durov received an offer of $250k for the username @liar The CEO of Telegram bought this name almost 3 years ago for $15k and previously received an offer of $109k. ❓ Will @monk accept this offer? @heritage

🐳8custom 57669339264298544996custom 54474582602002144254

21 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC≈2,080 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Anonymous number +8888666 was sold for $950,000 This NFT was originally minted in 2022 for $31,000. @heritage

🐳125custom 57896057531153840045

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @heritage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 83,437 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Heritage | Telegram usernames” (@heritage), 4,273 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heritage.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.