Channel
@herelerra22
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,251subscribers
+48 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001488395377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @herelerra22 |
| Description | та самая хехелера YouTube channel @LerkinCrunch по поводу рекламы/сотрудничества @oooiityl |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/herelerra22 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 8,251 | +32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 8,219 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 8,218 | +12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 8,206 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 8,203 | first reading |
143 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 143 (14 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 306,768 |
| Reactions total | 50,455 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50,455 reactions across 141 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 6.13% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5406799015989767044 | 3,091 | 6.13% | |
| custom 5406723540529474103 | 2,862 | 5.67% | |
| custom 5444988894523189480 | 2,509 | 4.97% | |
| custom 5328093529837184195 | 2,373 | 4.70% | |
| custom 5368752550709312140 | 2,354 | 4.67% | |
| custom 5266972932579551787 | 2,244 | 4.45% | |
| custom 5408949716568272263 | 2,220 | 4.40% | |
| custom 5406930708276997650 | 2,167 | 4.29% | |
| custom 5359596217305176317 | 2,047 | 4.06% | |
| custom 5359456703882500382 | 2,006 | 3.98% | |
| custom 5334866658903213306 | 1,960 | 3.88% | |
| custom 5409031277997221622 | 1,947 | 3.86% | |
| custom 5373159208629845154 | 1,847 | 3.66% | |
| custom 5406761392076255531 | 1,721 | 3.41% | |
| custom 5379565663452938522 | 1,525 | 3.02% | |
| custom 5366095756954451901 | 1,482 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5242442639185314045 | 1,435 | 2.84% | |
| custom 5359512585701987292 | 1,346 | 2.67% | |
| custom 5366504612071224391 | 1,334 | 2.64% | |
| custom 5332448553660870500 | 1,329 | 2.63% | |
| 22 further kinds | 10,656 | 21.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 141 of the 143 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50,455reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 143 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/6W471T0mC_E?si=M2ywyI2a5vuOsPY7
custom 525815511131779620676custom 538901110828567111530custom 524244263918531404520custom 52718548544011959209custom 52602391196441204602custom 54741555965235273992
@herelerra22 🦥
custom 538901110828567111599custom 547415559652352739924custom 524244263918531404515custom 527185485440119592013custom 52581551113177962062
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5474155596523527399118custom 538901110828567111535custom 524244263918531404528custom 527185485440119592021custom 52581551113177962069custom 52602391196441204608
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5474155596523527399132custom 538901110828567111532custom 524244263918531404525custom 527185485440119592021custom 526023911964412046011custom 52581551113177962067
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5242442639185314045125custom 527185485440119592031custom 538901110828567111527custom 547415559652352739923custom 525815511131779620611custom 52602391196441204606
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5271854854401195920122custom 547415559652352739931custom 538901110828567111530custom 524244263918531404526custom 525815511131779620612custom 526023911964412046012
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5242442639185314045126custom 538901110828567111534custom 547415559652352739930custom 527185485440119592024custom 525815511131779620613custom 52602391196441204603
vll.chalk💘
custom 527185485440119592091custom 525815511131779620617custom 538901110828567111516custom 547415559652352739913custom 52424426391853140458
Присоединяйтесь к чату https://t.me/+Jjhxdmi_NOFiZjcy будем рады вашему хрусту 🖤
custom 527185485440119592045custom 547415559652352739913custom 52581551113177962067custom 52602391196441204605custom 53890111082856711151
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5242442639185314045172custom 525815511131779620641custom 547415559652352739941custom 538901110828567111536custom 527185485440119592020custom 52602391196441204601
На сегодня всё 🤍 ооочень вкусно было!! меловой хруст вышел) Всё, чем хрустела, от Альбины https://t.me/MelOK_10
custom 5258155111317796206114custom 527185485440119592035custom 538901110828567111525custom 524244263918531404514custom 54741555965235273994
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5389011108285671115335custom 5271854854401195920104custom 524244263918531404599custom 525815511131779620655custom 547415559652352739933custom 526023911964412046032
Showing the 12 most recent of 143 posts we hold for @herelerra22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 96,294 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“vll.chalk” (@herelerra22), 8,251 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/herelerra22.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.