Channel
@hengcaijituan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,063subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003903357063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @hengcaijituan @rich585888 |
| Created | 9 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hengcaijituan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 2,063 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 2,071 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 2,067 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 2,078 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 2,079 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 2,079 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 2,078 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 2,085 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 2,085 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9 reactions across 2 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😄 博彩圈 主流系列平台 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭 👍 猎杰集团 系列平台 点击跳转 查看详情 👍 九号集团 系列平台 点击跳转 查看详情 👍 新宝集团 系列平台 点击跳转 查看详情 👍 金富集团 骰子/电子 点击跳转 查看详情 👍 大众集团 系列平台 点击跳转 查看详情 👍 中立台 系列平台 点击跳转 查看详情 👍 V集团 系列平台 点击跳转 查看详情 ====================================================== 😄博彩圈 主流常用软件 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭 常用做号软件下载 🌐 常用交友软件下载 🌐 常用VPN软件下…
❤2👍2👏1🔥1
😄 近期开业系列平台 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ ⏩ 点击返回 👀 平台目录 ⏪ ⚡ 恒彩系列 八方娱乐 综合盘首选 已稳定运营 ⚡ 赢咖系列 瑞丰娱乐 好程序首选 已稳定运营 ⚡ 大众系列 汇众娱乐 好程序首选 已稳定运营 ⚡ 天系列 运达娱乐 好程序首选 已稳定运营 ⚡ 新宝系列 东方娱乐 低频彩首选 已稳定运营 ⚡ 新宝系列 双赢 Ⅲ娱乐 低频彩首选 已稳定运营 ⚡ TG/系列 金富娱乐 电子/游戏 已稳定运营 …
❤1👍1👏1
😄 TG/系列 游戏 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ ⏩ 点击返回 👀 平台目录 ⏪ 👍 金富系列——金富电子 👍 金富系列——金富骰子 横财团队💵 合作引荐TG💎: @rich55 ( +888 0021 2121 ) 事务处理TG💎: @rich555 😄 恒彩集团中转群TG💎：@hcjt06 👍 恒彩集团官方资讯 🌐
凨起彩界朋友圈💰关注者风生水起 pinned Deleted message
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @hengcaijituan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 47,951 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“凨起彩界朋友圈💰关注者风生水起” (@hengcaijituan), 2,063 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hengcaijituan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.